this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
178 points (89.0% liked)

The Agora

1605 readers
1 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Exploding-heads.com is another instance on Lemmy where alt-right MAGA types tend to reside. Some people on this server want us to defederate from them immediately, some people want to save defederation as a last resort. They have 104 active users (more stats below).

It seems that exploding-heads has also experienced a recent botswarm invasion. This is obviously another point in favor of defederating them, assuming you are worried about botswarms, which is currently being discussed here.

My advice to you all is please try to discuss this in a civil manner, we need not allow them to create divisive conflict inside our communities. No matter how the vote turns out, you're not going to be able to defederate from your fellow sh.itheads so be nice.

I've linked many of the previous discussions below so people who are out of the loop can get a general sense of the situation.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/216888 https://sh.itjust.works/post/225714 https://sh.itjust.works/post/281126 https://sh.itjust.works/post/410325

Lemmy.world just recently defederated them.

https://lemmy.world/post/747912

https://lemmy.world/post/577526

Although this could be considered a point in favor of defederation, it actually means even if we vote to remain federated, people have a great alternative in lemmy.world where they can still participate in our communities and simultaneously be protected from exploding-heads.

Ensuring diversity of servers is beneficial to the platform as a whole, but it is also not our responsibility to bear that burden.

TLDR, just wrap up any last points in this thread before we open the vote tomorrow. Please be civil.

EDIT: To clarify, this isn't the official vote, this is the final discussion. The vote thread will be posted tomorrow and you will only be allowed to make a single comment saying Aye or Nay.

EDIT2: Vote thread is up, this thread is now locked. Very lively discussion thread sh.itheads. Please try to be more respectful next time.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OptimistPrime 60 points 2 years ago (19 children)

Defederate them. Tolerance has limits and we have the right and, in my opinion, obligation to not tolerate the intolerant. In the words of the crustpunk bartender, "you have to nip it in the bud immediately."

Here's the story taken from a series of tweets.

I was at a shitty crustpunk bar once getting an after-work beer. One of those shitholes where the bartenders clearly hate you. So the bartender and I were ignoring one another when someone sits next to me and he immediately says, "no. get out."

And the dude next to me says, "hey i'm not doing anything, i'm a paying customer." and the bartender reaches under the counter for a bat or something and says, "out. now." and the dude leaves, kind of yelling. And he was dressed in a punk uniform, I noticed

Anyway, I asked what that was about and the bartender was like, "you didn't see his vest but it was all nazi shit. Iron crosses and stuff. You get to recognize them."

And i was like, ohok and he continues.

"you have to nip it in the bud immediately. These guys come in and it's always a nice, polite one. And you serve them because you don't want to cause a scene. And then they become a regular and after awhile they bring a friend. And that dude is cool too.

And then THEY bring friends and the friends bring friends and they stop being cool and then you realize, oh shit, this is a Nazi bar now. And it's too late because they're entrenched and if you try to kick them out, they cause a PROBLEM. So you have to shut them down.

And i was like, 'oh damn.' and he said "yeah, you have to ignore their reasonable arguments because their end goal is to be terrible, awful people."

And then he went back to ignoring me. But I haven't forgotten that at all.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] gmatkins 59 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I vote defederate. This isn't a question of putting up with a little fascist rhetoric on an otherwise acceptable instance. Exploding heads is exclusively fascist rhetoric, bad faith users, and spam bots.

We have nothing to gain from listening to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catpocalypse 58 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I continue to vote for defederation.

Having looked at the instance in question myself and participated in the various conversations regarding defederation for them, I can see no valuable reason to keep federation at this point.

As late as yesterday I came across (and blocked) in my feed an account with a name from exploding-heads of ihate(trans_slur) that made its anti-trans purpose on their server clear. I would be glad to privately provide the screenshot of the account in question on request as I do not want to boost visibility or post hateful content myself.

There will always be ideas I personally do not agree with, that's fine. But it seems that this conversation around this one single instance has caused much trolling, many bad faith arguments, and has been at general odds at what I perceive the server is trying to accomplish.

The new information regarding botswarming is something I was not aware of until this post. I was monitoring the general posts regarding that type of content and supporting removal of bot instances, and that does add another layer to why defederation should be considered for this instance.

[–] imaqtpie 19 points 2 years ago

This is the kind of input I like to see 👍

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] themoonisacheese 56 points 2 years ago

For me this is an easy aye. We already defederate from Lemmygrad for tankyism. I don't see an issue with that, as that often comes with denying genocide and generally being apologetic of leaders of the past who have legislated against and killed minorities.

I don't see how a right-wing instance obsessed with Donald "very fine people on both sides" trump is any better. It simply stands to reason that if Lemmygrad is to remain defederated (and I don't see why not) then so should EH.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 52 points 2 years ago

Defederate them. There’s no room for Nazis and fascists anywhere, ever.

[–] surfcocktailsynth 49 points 2 years ago (10 children)

After a read through a few of their communities it's clear to me the instance favors the expression of right wing extremism under the claim of free speech.

So while I'm not usually against defederation as a rule, keeping the fediverse clean unfortunately means that hateful opinions must be shut down. And in that case the admin makes it clear in his recent post they want to keep hateful posts going on.

So defederation it is.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Contextual_Idiot 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I was also initially against defederation. I believe that to combat bigotry and hate, we need to show that those things aren't tolerated, and also why the those things are wrong. And I still believe this, however I don't believe it's the right response to EH anymore.

They are coming on to other instances and making posts like this, this, this, and this. Each one an innocuous post, but each one containing a link back to their instance.

It appears they are recruiting for their instance in the time tested way of slow exposure to radicalization.

Time to stop their spread and defederate them. And when their users come over because they like our communities, then we can combat their bigotry and hate, and ban those who won't change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WheeGeetheCat 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

I initially was against defederation. I went over there today and I've changed my mind. It's a trash heap of right wing extremist links. Dailymail, dailycaller, blaze, brietbart. It's every bit as ideologically motivated in the extreme right wing direction as lemmygrad is in the extreme left wing direction.

They are also calling for people to make alts and vote over here, so be aware. May want to check activity of posters when this vote finally goes down and check for low effort accounts that only voted and commented since today.

__

In the longer term, I'd like to see rules that define when we will defederate an instance so that we don't have to discuss it on an instance by instance basis. Or maybe we will want to have a grey area for discussion, and a red line that results in instant-defederation. Either way it'd be nice to have that info posted publicly.

FWIW it seems like exploding heads has plenty of content that would break rules, is generating more all the time, and their admin has no interest in moderating it

[–] captain_aggravated 25 points 2 years ago (18 children)

If I were to write such a standing policy for defederation, I think it would read something like this:

Admins of sh.itjust.works shall defederate with another instance immediately when that instance:

  1. is operated for the purpose of hosting bot accounts for the purposes of spam, scams, denial-of-service attacks, or other traffic generally unwelcome or disruptive to the Fediverse.
  2. is operated for the purpose of posting commercial advertisements to other instances.
  3. is operated primarily for the purpose of illegal or harmful acts, such as sharing child pornography, human trafficking, inciting/facilitating acts of violence or terrorism, etc.
  4. is operated primarily for the purpose of political extremism/radicalization to include rampant bigotry, racism, sexism, calls to violence.
  5. is generally operated in good faith but some temporary issue such as a credential theft has deprived the genuine admins of control of the instance and problematic posts/communities/members are being created. The admins may defederate or refederate as needed to meet this condition.

Admins or members of sh.itjust.works may call a member vote in the Agora on the matter of defederating when another instance when that instance:

  1. was historically operated in good faith but has more recently entered a state of low moderation; illegal/immoral/spam traffic is posted against the intsance's own rules with no attempt to moderate.
  2. is a very small instance operated by one or a few individuals to circumvent a ban if ban-worthy behavior continues.
  3. A non-emergency technical issue arises, for example an instance starts sending garbled posts which fill feeds with nonsense, members may request temporary defederation until the glitch is resolved.
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] imaqtpie 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They are also calling for people to make alts and vote over here, so be aware. May want to check activity of posters when this vote finally goes down and check for low effort accounts that only voted and commented since today.

I am keeping an eye on that. I banned @safeword because it was a clear example of that. Please notify us if you see any others.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Knaryo 40 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think we should defederate from any alt-right or facist instance, do not give them a plataform.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tobor 39 points 2 years ago

I vote defedederation. This is a clear instance of "nip it in the bud". Additionally, drafting a clear code of what the terms of defedederation will entail in the future will help both users and mods. We're still new in this whole fediverse learning experience, so it's understandable that there will be challenges like this, but I personally will feel most comfortable in instances which are willing to take strong stances against bigotry and hate speech.

[–] haxe11 37 points 2 years ago

At first I was against defederating from them, since even though I do not agree with their viewpoints, I was of the opinion that we should not be so hasty to defederate with anyone. I thought that it was against the spirit of the Fediverse.

However, I have since changed my mind. There are three types of federation in Lemmy: allow list, block list, and open. We aren't under any obligation federate anyone that feels like spinning up an instance.

The people on that instance, including its mods and admins, are a hate group. They break the sh.itjust.works rules of being respectful and having no bigotry. The exploding-heads content has no business even reaching the sh.itjust.works server, in my opinion.

It would also be a very bad look for us for sh.itjust.works users to create an account here and begin posting on instances which break our rules.

There is also the argument that, since we federate with a Nazi instance, we are also a Nazi instance. We had the "The Donald" and "Conspiracy Theories" communities which also supported that argument. Whether you agree with it or not, this is why we have been defederated from Beehaw, one of the larger Lemmy instances.

In addition to all of the ideological arguments above, they have opened themselves up to a botswarm invasion, and I think that is itself a reason to defederate them. It's a simple security concern!

Finally, I am in disbelief we are even voting on this a second time. I would have expected the moderator team to honor the previous vote to defederate from them. Any further discussion and vote should have been to re-federate with them.

[–] BrianTheBrain 36 points 2 years ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] meldroc 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My vote: defederate.

Exploding-heads.com is full of disgusting, hateful, toxic shit.

Besides, it's not banning, it's defederating. If you have the bad taste to want to see that bigoted dumpster fire, you can always go over there. We don't need it over here.

But we all know that the chuds aren't happy staying in their little shitholes. They want to bring the shit here even though we've plainly said we don't want it.

They want to bully, and they want to recruit new chuds. Don't let them use sh.itjust.works for that.

Deplatforming works, and that's why all the fashies are having a screaming tantrum. Fascism can't spread if the rest of us don't let them use our spaces for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] downtide 31 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I vote for defederation.

I'm in favour of sharing and experiencing diverse opinions but not where those opinions involve hatred and gross personal attacks on certain groups. People like this cannot be educated, cannot be persuaded, and their rhetoric causes a great deal of harm.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jwiggler 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is no way to debate these people who have no concept of reality. They do not argue in good faith, so all they do is spread misinformation about vaccines, covid, and free elections, and hate for minorities. I think we should defederate from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

Yes. Deport them. They're not sending their best people. They're sending their rapists and murderers.

[–] lacabraenlamachina 30 points 2 years ago

I would defederate.

I see no tangible benefit to associating with them. I don't see an esoteric benefit either.

If they want to be awful, but in an amplified and coordinated way, then I want no part of it.

Cancer doesn't need friends or allies.

[–] working_bee 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Note that since Lemmy is new, if I invite someone to this server and they see extremely racist content, they're never going to give this platform another try.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LudwigvanBeethoven 29 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I vote for defederation.

Just looked at them, and to be honest, it is pathetic. Their uhh... interesting interpretations of the Bible, and that they dismiss the arguments of people who have the opposite political viewpoints. This, in my view, is unacceptable. They (the alt-right, which seems to be the primary users of the instance) really only want to humiliate left-of-centre people. And when humilitation is the goal, that is not an opinion, that is hate.

sh.itjust.works should not federate with (show content of) instances that is completely dismissive and hateful of a group of people.

I also think that defederation should only be used against extreme cases of botswarming, which is something that looks to be happening: 6727 total users against 108 active in the last month, and 139 in the past half-year.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] socialjusticewizard 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (21 children)

My vote remains to defederate. Their administration are among the worst of the bad actors; to me, that is the primary issue as the admins will determine the shape of the instance. I have already pretty much abandoned this instance though, so take of that what you will. There is, in my opinion, an excessive amount of hand wringing and foot dragging over what should be a pretty easy question. As a consequence we've been flooded with very obvious apologist accounts and their bad faith arguments to protect their friends. I'd like to keep this account active but I'm deeply unimpressed with how this has all been handled and I no longer have much faith that sh.itjust.works is able to prevent itself from becoming a nazi bar.

In general I think instances this large are a mistake.

[–] Barbarian 21 points 2 years ago

There is, in my opinion, an excessive amount of hand wringing and foot dragging over what should be a pretty easy question. As a consequence we've been flooded with very obvious apologist accounts and their bad faith arguments to protect their friends

Completely agree.

I was initially hesitant. It seemed a bit rushed. I was wrong. I do like this instance, and I do like the possibilities, however we run a very real risk of looking like a safe space for bigotry as long as it's got a veneer of civility.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Barbarian 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just a heads up to those walking in to this thread now: this is not a vote.

Please read the arguments for and against. Please upvote the arguments you find convincing so that they're pushed to the top. Please write a comment if you see a line of argumentation hasn't been explored or hasn't been expressed well in your opinion. This is not the vote. That will come after.

EDIT: Also, probably should have mentioned: the final vote will be for users of this instance, but the discussion phase is very much open to anybody. Please, if you're from another instance, participate.

[–] platypode 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I see nothing to be gained from remaining federated. Exploding heads doesn't offer a "diversity of opinion" or engage in good-faith debate any more than lemmygrad, and remaining federated will do nothing but fill our feeds with their low-effort hate trolling and sully our instance's reputation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Djeece 27 points 2 years ago

I literally just joined, and I'm still wrapping my head around how all of this works, but I'd like to say this:

No matter which way this vote goes, I really appreciate how this is being handled: An open, honest and respectful debate amongst the users is by far the best way I've seen a "social network" try to handle content moderation.

Well done people.

[–] priapus 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I vote that we should defederate. While users are able to block this content, new users seeing it will not want to stay here. If this instance does not allow hate speech, then we should not be federating with those that do.

I understand that they currently have a small amount of users, but as with all MAGA communities I am certain it will grow fast, especially if allowed to federate with larger instances where they can share their views. I fear continuing to federate with them will lead to sh.itjust.works becoming a nazi bar situation.

I do understand if this instance does not want to moderate in this way, but I believe that it will lead to many moving to a community with more strict guidelines on federation. I know I would, as no part of me wants to read hate speech when I browse all.

[–] IdiosyncraticIdiot 26 points 2 years ago

You can watch my opinion evolve https://sh.itjust.works/comment/468378

It is no longer "like two people or something lol".

The difference between posts and comments is large as others pointed out (way more posts) and to me this indicates they are looking more for "you need MY content in your feed (because I said so)" more than "let's discuss this content". I prefer the latter.

I am now in favor of defederating exploding heads.

If you want that content in your feed, there are plenty of ways to get it. I don't.

[–] ProfessorChaos 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For what it's worth. I was looking at the server statistics on https://the-federation.info/platform/73 (linked from join-lemmy) and I noticed something. Almost all of the largest lemmy servers have far more comments than posts. The only two notable exceptions are lemmynsfw and exploding heads. They both have far more posts than comments. I'm not sure what it means, but it might be useful to someone in this discussion.

For example.

  • sh.itjust.works has 5966 posts to 32670 comments

  • exploding heads has 18406 posts to 5503 comments

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shit 23 points 2 years ago

Defederate they are not even a free speech instance. I really don't want to see them talking and making memes about children's gentiles when I sort by new.

[–] ilovededyoupiggy 22 points 2 years ago

I'm late to the discussion, but, I'd be a fan of temporary defederation until Lemmy supports users blocking entire instances. I'm not overly big on the idea of defederation in general, I feel like it hurts the fediverse overall. But I don't want to see those asshats either. I keep blocking the communities as they pop up. But it's not really my place to tell everyone else what kind of content they can and can't enjoy.

And I imagine that even on an instance that leans that way, there are probably still "normal" communities too. If the world's biggest and best "cute cat pictures" community somehow manages to spring up on an instance that also has a Nazi community, what then? If my only interaction with that instance and it's users are through cute cat pictures, and I don't ever know that the guy who posted the cat pic also happens to like swastikas and sucking camel dicks, why should I even care?

In the real world, unfortunately, the guys who like swastikas and sucking camel dicks also seem to really like telling everyone about it. So keeping them federated still gives them an ability to try to infect others. Because they definitely won't stay in their little box.

So anyways. It's hard. My preference is to leave it federated for those that want to see it, as long as there's an easy way to block it for those that don't. Since that doesn't exist just yet, I'd be for defederation for exactly as long as it takes for Lemmy to implement instance blocking at a user level. Then open it back up and everyone can make their own choice as they see fit.

[–] wtvr 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

+1 on defederation

I'm sick of blocking each sub and user individually as they show up on my feed

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thetokenlady 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I vote to defederate. The bot swarm by itself would be enough, but the inability of individual users to block instances means that those of us who do not want to see their garbage do not have another realistic option. If Lemmy ever gives user instance-blocking, then I would reserve defederation to botting and to illegal content and allow people to choose who to associate with on their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

I'll preface by saying I'm not a user of this instance. My opinion is that alt-right is synonymous with fascists. Giving fascists any platform will always result in their attempts to silence you and take your platform away. I think the ability to defederate with toxic communities is a blessing we shouldn't fear so much. If their ideas are acceptable, they'll find an audience. Either by being accepted by other instances, or others joining theirs. I just think it's important to be loud about the decision so that if others want to hear their beliefs, they can check them out.

[–] Leer10 20 points 2 years ago

I vote to defederate. Like I said before, I was looking for an Oregon community and the only one that showed up in search results was the exploding heads one, which had a long history of posts denigrating trans and homeless people. In this case, I think no content is better than awful content. I wouldn't want some Lemmy newbie joining this server and misconstruing the Oregon community federated from them as our own.

[–] Eeyore_Syndrome 15 points 2 years ago

+1 Defederate. Save us the effort from blocking each of their users and communities.

load more comments
view more: next ›