grizzledgrizzly

joined 2 years ago
[–] grizzledgrizzly 55 points 1 year ago

everyone knows scholars lead to education and education leads to a “woke” populace that doesn’t put up with this bullshit. gotta keep everyone dumb as bricks …

[–] grizzledgrizzly 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not when it comes to fascists, no.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 2 points 2 years ago

Catholics are going to realize real fast they chose poorly with Trump. He really loves the Southern Baptist mentality. Catholics think they are getting one thing but that’s a short-sighted alliance. These people have no idea what they really face.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I like to play the game where we switch out “trans” with another group like “black” or “Jewish” and then see how it sounds … oops - sounds like they’re coming for every group that isn’t white, neurotypical, & CIS. When they’re done with the physical discrimination they’ll come for the Muslim and Jewish people and the non-Protestants, and then after they round up all the “dissidents” it will only be a certain kind of religious denomination allowed. It’s similar to the start of Nazi Germany and any other fascist regime.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 1 points 2 years ago

Sorry, replied to my own comment but I don’t want to delete it because people are assuming I’m an idiot. Sorry for the ambiguity. What I mean to say is that the language this general is using very clearly indicates that the US has plans in place that have been decided on prior to any serious engagement. To call it a “prediction” is a poor choice of words. Thanks for assuming I’m a conspiracy nut you guys. Also, not everyone lives on Lemmy and can respond instantly. Whether you like my comment or not it is not cool to speculate on someone based a one-word statement.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 1 points 2 years ago

Sorry, replied to my own comment but I don’t want to delete it because people are assuming I’m an idiot. Sorry for the ambiguity. What I mean to say is that the language this general is using very clearly indicates that the US has plans in place that have been decided on prior to any serious engagement. To call it a “prediction” is a poor choice of words. Thanks for assuming I’m a conspiracy nut you guys. Also, not everyone lives on Lemmy and can respond instantly. Whether you like my comment or not it is not cool to speculate on someone based a one-word statement.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sorry, replied to my own comment but I don’t want to delete it because people are assuming I’m an idiot. Sorry for the ambiguity. What I mean to say is that the language this general is using very clearly indicates that the US has plans in place that have been decided on prior to any serious engagement. To call it a “prediction” is a poor choice of words. Thanks for assuming I’m a conspiracy nut you guys. Also, not everyone lives on Lemmy and can respond instantly. Whether you like my comment or not it is not cool to speculate on someone based a one-word statement. Also I didn’t mean to post this a bunch of times. My app is a bit buggy.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 1 points 2 years ago

Sorry, replied to my own comment but I don’t want to delete it because people are assuming I’m an idiot. Sorry for the ambiguity. What I mean to say is that the language this general is using very clearly indicates that the US has plans in place that have been decided on prior to any serious engagement. To call it a “prediction” is a poor choice of words. Thanks for assuming I’m a conspiracy nut you guys. Also, not everyone lives on Lemmy and can respond instantly. Whether you like my comment or not it is not cool to speculate on someone based a one-word statement.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 0 points 2 years ago

I wasn’t dog whistling - what group am I supposedly trying to garner support for?

[–] grizzledgrizzly 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This was my intention. The title is misleading imo.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 1 points 2 years ago

Thanks for your kind words. I am not an idiot or a conspiracy nut.

[–] grizzledgrizzly 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sorry for the ambiguity. What I mean to say is that the language this general is using very clearly indicates that the US has plans in place that have been decided on prior to any serious engagement. To call it a “prediction” is a poor choice of words. Thanks for assuming I’m a conspiracy nut you guys. Also, not everyone lives on Lemmy and can respond instantly. Whether you like my comment or not it is not cool to speculate on someone based a one-word statement.

 

I don’t know what I’m doing…

view more: next ›