tobor

joined 1 year ago
[–] tobor 2 points 1 year ago

They don't hate them at all! They just steal their ideas

[–] tobor 2 points 1 year ago

Definitely not a cop tattoo

[–] tobor 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes! Give me Zelda Tears of the Kingdom 1.1.1 again. For... not item duping reasons

[–] tobor 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey I just wanted to say first of all, this has been great discussion, I really appreciate it. I guess it all goes back to the original purpose of the internet, which was never meant to be turned into some heavily monetized cash cow for a handful of companies. Open source has created some amazing tools, and I'm a big fan of things like GNU and cc licenses. For me, individuals using whatever I write as a tool is no problem at all. But when it comes to a big company that just wants to scrape data for a LLM, that's not the same.

This is wild thinking, but like say if they wanted to scrape the lemmyverse, ok, but they had to pay so we could maintain servers etc. We'd all benefit.

[–] tobor 5 points 1 year ago

Human psychology doesn't have a standard.

Monogamy is just one of a wide range of social arrangements that have existed all throughout human history, and continue to exist.

see: distribution of monogamy

Personally, I've been in multiple partner relationships. Are they perfect? No, absolutely not. But neither were some of the monogamous relationships I've been in.

I think the comic is a little off too, and I agree with you about how it portrays cheating, but it doesn't make sense to shit on all forms of relationship that you don't agree with.

[–] tobor 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just to rag on the Bob Ross metaphor, because I absolutely love him, he might not have minded if I followed along with his paintings, but he was absolutely selling some pthalo blue (which is not a bad thing its own right) and what happened to him after he died was absolutely terrible in terms of monetisation without his permission.

I guess this is all sorta tangential to the main thread here, but I think we should start seeing our information in terms of actual value, and even if we choose to contribute to an open platform like this (which I absolutely support) how much is that actually worth.

Kinda like if you work pro bono, it's still good to keep a record of what your billable amount would have been.

Zuck and co have a vested interest in making us think that what we provide is worthless

[–] tobor 5 points 1 year ago

It's also a heck of a lot cheaper than creating a legless zombie universe. Shareholders are probably drooling at the potential of returning to the old sabatoge playbook

[–] tobor 4 points 1 year ago

Seems like they're just trying to get their fingers in the pie, it's what they always do regardless of whether they know it will work or not.

[–] tobor 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I get that, and I don't think the solution is a walled garden. But I do think it will become more of an issue as these companies get more aggressive about going after any data they can find.

[–] tobor 3 points 1 year ago

At this point, I really don't know. But I guess the difference is that here, or possibly other instances at least the users can have a say in it. Posting topics like this helps.

That for me feels way better than just having some company give out the terms and having us accept it whether we like it or not.

I feel like this is all still new enough to where we can shape it in a different direction than "growth at all costs"

[–] tobor 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The difference is that Reddit was looking to IPO off that data, here that won't happen. We were the product there.

If you're ok with your data being used, maybe there's a way to opt into that. But I would rather it be something data trawlers had to forcibly ask first rather than just stealing it and then saying "oopsies"

[–] tobor 15 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Personally I'll support instances that choose to tell Zuckybags to fuck right off, and I think the fediverse is pretty well set up to be able to do that.

But I guess the bigger question how is how we protect our information, since it seems like everything that happens here is pretty wide open.

The big companies will all come for places like this and trawl for "genuine human input" to feed their AI cashbabies, and what we create has value. Maybe even the shitposts. So how do we protect that?

3
From "My God, It's Full of Stars" (www.poetryfoundation.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by tobor to c/poetry
 

by Tracy K. Smith

3

Perhaps the great error is believing we’re alone,

That the others have come and gone—a momentary blip—

When all along, space might be choc-full of traffic,

Bursting at the seams with energy we neither feel

Nor see, flush against us, living, dying, deciding,

Setting solid feet down on planets everywhere,

Bowing to the great stars that command, pitching stones

At whatever are their moons. They live wondering

If they are the only ones, knowing only the wish to know,

And the great black distance they—we—flicker in.

Maybe the dead know, their eyes widening at last,

Seeing the high beams of a million galaxies flick on

At twilight. Hearing the engines flare, the horns

Not letting up, the frenzy of being. I want to be

One notch below bedlam, like a radio without a dial.

Wide open, so everything floods in at once.

And sealed tight, so nothing escapes. Not even time,

Which should curl in on itself and loop around like smoke.

So that I might be sitting now beside my father

As he raises a lit match to the bowl of his pipe

For the first time in the winter of 1959.

 
15
Train Window (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by tobor to c/raining
 
 

I don't care either way, but I always thought it was funny how reddit was so vehemently anti-emoji

view more: next ›