this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
43 points (89.1% liked)

The Agora

1603 readers
1 users here now

In the spirit of the Ancient Greek Agora, we invite you to join our vibrant community - a contemporary meeting place for the exchange of ideas, inspired by the practices of old. Just as the Agora served as the heart of public life in Ancient Athens, our platform is designed to be the epicenter of meaningful discussion and thought-provoking dialogue.

Here, you are encouraged to speak your mind, share your insights, and engage in stimulating discussions. This is your opportunity to shape and influence our collective journey, just like the free citizens of Athens who gathered at the Agora to make significant decisions that impacted their society.

You're not alone in your quest for knowledge and understanding. In this community, you'll find support from like-minded individuals who, like you, are eager to explore new perspectives, challenge their preconceptions, and grow intellectually.

Remember, every voice matters and your contribution can make a difference. We believe that through open dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to discovery, we can foster a community that embodies the democratic spirit of the Agora in our modern world.

Community guidelines
New posts should begin with one of the following:

Only moderators may create a [Vote] post.

Voting History & Results

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

See the tool here: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/95652

And some discussion of the issue here: https://lemm.ee/post/177673

This tool produces a list of instances which have a very high number of users compared to the number of comments and posts. These instances are assumed to have high number of bot accounts on them.

Some other instances have started blocking them, should sh.itjust.works follow suit?

Of course, this need not be permanent, and will be reversed when those instances resolve the issue.

For reference, this is a list of instances suspected of being botted by the tool's default settings: https://overseer.dbzer0.com/api/v1/instances?activity_suspicion=20&domains=true

Ayes and nays please!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Difficult_Bit_1339 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@[email protected]

Hey! It's the hypothetical software we were just talking about!

This sounds really useful. Having to have each admin independently de-federate from spam instances is a huge overhead that a tool like this would help with.

[–] imaqtpie 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow, this platform is growing up before our eyes.

Thanks https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/db0.

It's my understanding that db0 was a mod over at r/piracy and was able to get a big chunk of subscribers to come over to Lemmy. Good on him for being one of the only reddit mods to take a stand.

[–] tcely 7 points 1 year ago

Nay.

I don't like bots much, but this is still an assumption. I don't want to get into preventative de-federation, if it is at all possible to avoid it.

The Meta/Facebook instance(s) should be though.

[–] sneakyninjapants 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aye

I trust that @TheDude has some method of contact available so the offending instance operators can hash out refederation in the future.

[–] god 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the script in theory removes instances that have handled their spam issue which should also in theory remove from the defederation recommendations, and if there's regular updates to the federation list, we would refederate without them having to communicate

[–] sneakyninjapants 4 points 1 year ago

removes instances that have handled their spam issue

Ah now that you mention it, that makes perfect sense. Their user count to activity count ratio will improve once they remove the bot accounts.

[–] can 3 points 1 year ago
[–] pancakes 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Aye.

It's pretty obvious which ones are botted instances. 30,000 users and 20 total posts on the instance? That's a bot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nyahlathotep 5 points 1 year ago

Aye.

I haven't looked into how it works, but I feel like we should be open to reviewing it's findings if an instance wants to dispute our defederation. Maybe it's got a surefire method of determining bot-heavy lemmys (bottys?), but I'm worried about false positives.

[–] ScreaminOctopus 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aye

This is definitely gonna turn into a mess for servers that don't take care of this pre-emptively

[–] imperator 3 points 1 year ago

Not just that. They can spin a server up in seconds and create bots

[–] goat 4 points 1 year ago

Aye

But I think Dude should have the right to say no if he doesn't trust it.

[–] sapient_cogbag 4 points 1 year ago

Aye, as long as there's an easy way to unblock.

[–] Faendol 4 points 1 year ago
[–] nanoUFO 4 points 1 year ago

Aye but we need to figure out how the process of unblocking them will work.

[–] MoreCoffee 3 points 1 year ago

Aye. It's clear those are bot accounts, I see no reason not to. Servers can be unblocked in the future if things change.

[–] haxe11 3 points 1 year ago

Aye.

I agree with others in the thread that we should be open to communicating with admins for false positives though.

[–] WheeGeetheCat 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Aye

I think this tool is a really great call out, I'm here because I wanted to make a discussion post about this as well.

I like the idea of using the tool for reference although I'm not sure it should be an automatic block. It does seem like its a better idea than doing nothing at all about these bot instances though.

Question Is there a difference between blocking and defederating?

[–] SavvyWolf 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think so; I used "block" as a shorthand for defederate.

Agreed on doing it manually though, there only seems to be a handful of instances that are problematic, so we probably don't need to use the python script.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Contextual_Idiot 3 points 1 year ago

Aye!

We'll use the bots to destroy the bots!

[–] captain_americano 3 points 1 year ago
[–] thefool 3 points 1 year ago
[–] SugaredScoundrel 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Catpocalypse 3 points 1 year ago
[–] humancrayon 3 points 1 year ago
[–] crbn 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Oneandonlyzach 3 points 1 year ago
[–] gmatkins 3 points 1 year ago
[–] loutr 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Hagarashi8 2 points 1 year ago
[–] snota 2 points 1 year ago
[–] thetokenlady 2 points 1 year ago
[–] turtle_comet 2 points 1 year ago
[–] PorkTaco 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Whooping_Seal 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Abrslam 2 points 1 year ago
[–] easydnesto 2 points 1 year ago
[–] med 2 points 1 year ago
[–] pattmayne 2 points 1 year ago

Nay.

I do support blocking spam servers and bot farms, but what's our criteria?

We need more information. How sure are we that they're bot farms?

[–] ShadowAether 2 points 1 year ago
[–] TheDailyChase 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Gongin 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Oni_eyes 2 points 1 year ago
[–] moonsnotreal 2 points 1 year ago
[–] annegreen 2 points 1 year ago

Aye. I’m concerned about bot presence on Lemmy because recent estimates place bot accounts as the vast majority of accounts on the networks. I worry that if we don’t take actions against bots now, we’ll come to regret it in the future.

[–] aspseka 2 points 1 year ago

Nay! We should alert them of their mistake and help them fix it. We should only defederate from instances that are only host bots.

[–] PastAlternatives 2 points 1 year ago
[–] LudwigvanBeethoven 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Rossel 2 points 1 year ago

Aye, this could be a future headache if we just let it be.

load more comments
view more: next ›