this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1603 points (99.3% liked)

News

23274 readers
2874 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1063 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (21 children)

People. We, the French, pulled a left-wing coalition out of our asses in less than a week and managed to "win" an election. You have months. Hope is permitted.

[–] [email protected] 129 points 3 months ago

It's very true. We've been brainwashed into a year long campaign mostly because it generates a lot of money for various parties but prior elections have proven it's mostly what happens in the last month that makes a difference.

Y'all are lucky you can make coalitions, though. This is more akin to your election if you only had centrists and far right running. Two party system and all that.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think you'll start to see a lot more excitement in the next few weeks.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm already noticing a lot of hype for Kamala 🤞

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I mean, ok, what's not to hype? The second Black president, but in two centuries, it would be the first woman. The right's heads will collectively explode if she wins.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Mmmm you know this would be quite the upside

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The last time a black person became president, they got Trump. A black woman president will be...Super Trump?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I shudder to think what they could come up with that would worse than Trump, because we know there is no depth the bar can't sink to

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A guy just as completely lacking in any sort of shame, morals, or empathy, but actually smart. He'd also have to be smart enough to hide the fact that he's smart, because the GOP relies on the "really fucking stupid" vote.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So we need a French immigrant to help fix the government?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Hope and change" is back in it to win it.

Motherfucking Obama at it again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol, Obama comming back would be incredible. Is he even allowed to? He already served two terms

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

He's not allowed to but people are saying Michelle could be the pick, but that would only be marginally better than Kamala

They need Gretchen, Pete, or Kelly

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Jon Stewart. Someone go pull him and make him do it. There's no one better to take down Trump.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

He'd be miserable the whole time, but we'd all be better off. Please Jon!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I mean I'd love it and I'm going back and forth on this comment. His biggest negative is those who lean right will see him exactly as he is "a New York Jew"

That said, who better to trounce Trump and humiliate his ass? I think the only thing better would be Michelle Obama. Trump would lose his absolute shit debating and/or losing to a woman let alone a black woman.

Watch that fucker drop the N bomb in a debate against her lol

[–] merc 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A 2-woman ticket would never work. It's going to be very dicey having a woman leading the ticket with a man as VP, given how sexist the US electorate is.

[–] slackassassin 9 points 3 months ago (11 children)

What's sexist is going on and on about how a woman is unelectable.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can someone find the "hope is kindled" gif from LoTR Return of the King? When Pipin lights the beacon of Minas Tirith. I can't find it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

You are a wonderful human. May you find 20 bucks in a pocket of the next coat you put on

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

Thanks for your support! And very happy to see your success in France.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You, the French, have not been the target of a 40 year war against public education by the right wing. Americans are on average significantly less capable of rational thought because of it. Source: I am an American raised in the crippled education system I mentioned before.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (5 children)

It’s a bit naive to think Western Europe hasn’t been under attack from the right wing at least as long as the US has. They’ve had wars over it that never really reached US shores, and it never really went away. All of the strategies that have been used in the US were piloted and honed in Europe – look up the activities there by Manafort, Stone, Bannon, etc. all the same names who have been implementing the shit you’re seeing in the US were active in Western and Eastern Europe years before this. It’s been going on there far longer.

It’s amazing to me that people in the US haven’t been paying attention to what’s gone on there and learning from their successes.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A "long" election campaign in the UK is 6 weeks. In 1992 they had one that was just 30 days.

Months is plenty of time, especially in the modern world. Maybe 250 years ago it was necessary to campaign for months on end so that the candidate could personally travel by train to every state. But, with modern media (both traditional and social), there's no real reason for campaigns to be as long as they are. The only reason they're this long is that the thought is that the earlier you start campaigning, the better. So, each side keeps starting earlier and earlier, making it effectively into a neverending campaign cycle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Thank you, French. You're awesome. I was losing hope, and yet a miracle happened.

Good job.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Props to the French voters for shutting out the Rally.

Most of the French voters.

Damn good job in the second round.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We don't really do coalitions here. Our voting system doesn't allow for it.

It does happen within Congress itself though, when different sects of the two parties cross the aisle to join with the other party on certain issues. But since Congress doesn't elect a prime minister, it doesn't happen for the presidency.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago

I know. You're missing my point. :)

My point wasn't the coalition. My point was that we had 21 days to cobble something together and not only did we do it, we managed to win with it. It's not about the coalition, it's about building a campaign. You have months to do so.

And you're about to say that Trump had way longer to do so. Yes. So did the far right in our country, which barely even campaigned because all of the media were doing so on their behalf for the last two years and we still managed to outnumber them.

Trust me, my faith in the Democrats is barely existent. But still, I think it can be done.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Well spoken.

A few months in politics is an eternity. Yes, things are chaotic right now, but this is short term. We can unify after this. And we can win.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Viva la France

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

It's a binary choice in the US presidential election, that isn't even based on the popular vote.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Lord have merci

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why'd you put "win" in quotes?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because we only have a relative majority and now Macron is teaming up with the hard right (not the far right, the other right right that is not center right... Yeah, too much right is wrong) to deprive us of any path to government. Shit sucks. But it could have sucked way harder.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's also a strategic moderate move to keep the hard right from merging with Reform.

I'm hoping the left wing parties aren't locked out and still able to get progress made.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Cuddling up to the hard right might look like a strategical move but it never works. Normalising them only shifts the discussion further to the right. And let's face it... in this post-factual time where all that matters is the narratives, giving them a platform will only help to brain-wash more people into believing right-wing fake-solutions to actual problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Because, well, the left coalition came out ahead of the vote but then started to loose ground to political shenanigans. War is not over but a significant battle was lost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I fuckin' hope so. 🤞🏽

[–] mindbleach 1 points 3 months ago

No, the sun rose in the east today! That's bad for the democrats somehow!

load more comments (2 replies)