Yea, those are all points that I should have included in the bot, my apologies. I will propably make a public post for people to discuss and help me to refine the bot. Thank you for the feedback.
Items that are objectively considered bad are removed. This message is more intended to warn the users. I agree that I should rephrase the message.
Thank you for the feedback.
Yea, that sounds like a good idea. Thank you for the feedback (:
Seems like you guys really don’t like my bot, haha. Whoops, sorry. Will for now disable it and see how to proceed.
The current parameters for the bot to send this message are that the source is considered to have medium or low credibility or that the source’s reporting is considered low or very low. The message itself doesn’t mean that the post will face any moderation action, it’s just a notification to the community. I’m still working on this functionality, so any feedback is welcome (: (I am aware of the typos, fixing them right now)
Bleep Bloop. When reading this source, please be critical. This source has been rated by MFBR as being of lower credibility. Report: Source detected: thedailybeast.com, BSFR ratubg: bias: left, credibility: medium-credibility, questionable: []. Thank you for being a part of !news :D (this action was taken automatically)
Trying to learn to make 3D vector art, as I really like the look. This one is a remake from: https://dribbble.com/shots/6964787-Apollo-Reddit-Robots
I really like how it turned out, am curious if anyone can give me tips to make it look even better (:
Alt:
First panel "How academics call something boring (by discipline)"
Second panel "Philosopher" Image of female looking at paper saying "That's elementary"
Third panel "Methematician" Image of male looking at paper saying "That's trivial"
Fourth panel "Physicist" Image of male looking at paper saying "That makes sense"
Happy cakeday!