this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
562 points (98.3% liked)

News

24686 readers
3529 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk called for U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer's impeachment after the judge blocked his department, DOGE, from accessing sensitive Treasury records.

DOGE has faced criticism for its broad data access. Engelmayer ruled that only specialized civil servants could access Treasury records and ordered DOGE to destroy any obtained data.

Musk and GOP figures condemned the ruling, but judicial impeachment remains rare, with only eight judges removed since 1803.

The next court hearing is set for February 14.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the point of not return. This shit doesn't happen until it's too late.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Absolutely correct! After this there is no other option outside revolution. We americans have to shake off the Russian "and then it got worse" mentality and start fighting.

First step is general strike. If that fails we have no choices but submission or revolution.

We have to general strike now!

[–] ayyy 25 points 1 day ago

Free impeach absolutist

[–] AlecSadler 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

GOP is going to impeach and replace judges across the board, calling it now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago

They don't have that much of a majority. They can impeach but there's enough Democrats in the Senate to block it.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago

Judge disagrees with my illegal actions?

Just call for an impeachment

Welcome to 2025

[–] meowmeowbeanz 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Musk’s latest judicial meltdown proves he’s allergic to consequences. When the courts don’t bow to his tantrums, he screams “impeachment” like a toddler demanding a new toy chest. Newsflash, Elon: judges aren’t your code monkeys.

His “free speech absolutist” shtick crumbles faster than a Dogecoin rug pull. Now he’s just another billionaire brat trying to bully the legal system because it dared to… checks notes… enforce laws. Meanwhile, his fanboys spin conspiracy theories while European regulators laugh into their actual rulebooks.

Democracy’s a dumpster fire? Absolutely. But watching Musk speedrun institutional collapse for clout? Priceless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

Democracy’s a dumpster fire? Absolutely. But watching Musk speedrun institutional collapse for clout? Priceless. couldn't have said it better myself.

[–] [email protected] 148 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Musk, who called it "absolutely insane," saying it prevents him from exposing alleged fraud in the federal government.

that's what the inspectors general do, or rather did before they were axed.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm curious why nobody in authority or the media has publicly questioned how he was single-handedly able to uncover so much fraud in $5+ trillion worth of transactions with zero prior experience or knowledge of these systems all in a week's worth of time. He's so obviously full of shit here.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

It's easy when your definitions of "fraud" is "anything I don't personally like".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Great video, but long. Here's a clip of the boy who thinks we are stupid and the MSM backing him up by omitting a vital detail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

"I said no bits!"

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but those guys use facts and figures and stuff. This way, Elon can manipulate anything he wants to do whatever they want. Much easier way to allow a fascist takeover.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

This.

He's not against fraud. He wants to pick the winners and losers. That's how kleptocracies work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The fraud is in plain sight

[–] [email protected] 162 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Majority of the US calls for musk to be jailed, trialed for treason and to never see the light of day again. Deal with that first before musks useless claims

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

jailed

Not the word I've been using.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

The punishment for treason is death, the GOP supports the death penalty so let's use it

[–] Corkyskog 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly if I thought we could keep him in jail, that would be my preference. I couldn't imagine how miserable he would be... If you take Ketamine everyday do you get withdrawals if you stop?

[–] skulblaka 2 points 1 day ago

It does have withdrawal symptoms, and they're not fun, but they are usually not deadly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does it rhyme with filled? If so, I'm all for it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Krilled?

I dont think id ever give this man a shrimp in my life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Majority? Where did you get that from?

[–] andrew_bidlaw 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's likely no way to say the DB they obtained is deleted without a copy. They should behave like it is stolen and can't be deleted, there's no way to gracefully walk back once it's obtained, and any known further leak should be linked to that if not proven otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

Ya, it's really hard to prove something like this in any situation.

You do the best you can to enforce it, but when you inevitably miss a hidden copy, at least if it gets exposed in the future you have them on violating a court order.

If that means anything anymore anyway.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago

More proof that Trump and Musk are co-tyrants by definition, the only checks and balances they care about are their bank ledgers, and they see the US Constitution as a speed bump.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Quick reality check, what would happen to any of us if we said shit to a judge?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

Something something contempt of court

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

We wouldn't be able to post about it later.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Outside of a court room ? Most likely nothing at all.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Hitler also went after lawyers and the courts. In April 1933, Hitler passed one of the earliest antisemitic laws, purging Jewish and also Socialist judges, lawyers, and other court officers from their professions.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's like the worlds weakest bully. "How dare you say that to me!? Somebody punch this guy for me."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He doesn't know how to do anything besides buying things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I dunno, he seems to know how to do drugs fairly well.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I find that in life you can measure how much of a good idea something is for everyone else by how loud the trust fund baby in the group is screeching. The louder the better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

This administration is "Oops! All trust fund babies"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The what baby? I do not get it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

A "trust fund baby" is someone who was born rich. It also generally contacted an over-inflater sense of accomplishment and worth. People like like Elon Musk and Donald Trump.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

A trust fund baby is someone born into wealth

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Have we reached the point where we don't even bother to make up a fake crime or improper behavior the official is supposed to have committed that justifies their impeachment?

He should just be impeached because he ruled against Musk doing what he wants? I guess I appreciate the honesty.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Lock Musk up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Nazi Musk, lock him up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course he does. Let's see where this gets him. I guess the chances for impeachment are more than slim.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nah, they don’t have 2/3rds in the Senate

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

They might if it's a secret vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I agree. There should be impeachments related to DOGE.