this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
529 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19675 readers
4344 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Efforts to impeach Donald Trump for a third time are intensifying as he begins his second term.

The non-partisan group Free Speech For People launched the "Impeach Trump. Again" campaign, citing constitutional violations, including his alleged role in the January 6 Capitol riots and breaches of the emoluments clause.

The group also accuses Trump of campaign finance violations, xenophobic rhetoric, and abuse of power.

However, impeachment remains unlikely with Republicans controlling Congress. Democrats may revisit impeachment if they regain control in 2026.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 150 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Jesus Christ... NO.

Same as the last two times, it's a wasted effort without the votes in the Senate. If you can't remove him, don't bother. Focus on winning back the House and Senate in 2026.

[–] Banana 142 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Time and time again, this image remains relevant

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of the things I hate about yes minister is how it still applies 40 years later. Like f%@$!

[–] Banana 21 points 1 week ago

Ya I always laugh when people talk about how accurately the Simpsons predicts things. It's like, no, politics is just that fucking cyclical and the writers were smart.

I say were because it's not what it used to be.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

That's the idea. Impeach him after 26. It's in the article

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Impeachment is the check against his power. It would be better to convict, but the democrats need to make the argument and convince the people that Trump should be held accountable. Get Republicans in the Senate and House on record supporting Trump's crimes, and then beat them in the midterm elections.

Impeachment is how you win those elections. Rolling over and showing your belly is why Democrats keep losing before the fight begins.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In this moment impeachment is a waste of time. They would be better served (1) governing super well in places they are in charge (to demonstrate they are the better option - something that is inconsistent today); (2) figuring out why people are voting for Trump; (3) developing strong messaging and strategy to win races top to bottom of the ballot. I've been unimpressed with their ability to both run and govern recently (with some exceptions here and there). Maybe it is catching up with them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

In this moment impeachment is a waste of time.

Any time he's focusing on that is time he's not actively fucking shit up. Being obstructionist is what's gotten the Republicans to the place they are now.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Ah, but this is the least effective way for Democrats to show their donors that they're still "fighting" for them. The only thing that matters now is manufacturing some talking point to get more donations in 2026.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Unfortunately this is just a sign of how bad the US has gotten.

There have been impeachment attempts on Clinton, W Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden. Impeachment was supposed to be used to stop a president acting illegally but its just become another political weapon in the US capitol.

The US system is so unbelievably broken. It entirely depends on bipartisan support to get things done but things are now too polarised to function and the electoral system prevents 3rd parties access at any level.

The two parties have destroyed democracy. It could be fixed but it would need to start at the state levels with 3rd parties coming in and rebuilding the electoral system. But the 2 parties have even gerrymandered the constituencies so only the two parties can win.

Even other countries with first past the post systems have other viable political parties - look at the UK, Australia and Canada. Fptp is flawed and breed an replacing but the US version is next level for locking in the status quo.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 week ago (48 children)

It's not "the two parties". The Republicans impeachment efforts have universally been partisan witch hunts - even the successful one against Clinton. (And I am no fan of Clinton. He should have been ostracized by the Democrats a long time ago). W Bush and Trump both committed crimes worthy of removal from office. It's not the same at all.

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just an FYI, Australia doesn't have first past the post, rather we have preferential and compulsory voting. We're quite proud of it. An independent organisation creates voting districts which means gerrymandering is minimised

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No GOP backing, so this is meaningless theater.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

Exactly. He's been impeached twice and nothing happened. He should have been barred from office years ago. The entire process is nothing but political theatre for donors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Impeachment stops corrupt individuals, not an entire party of fascists

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lol as proved last time, impeachment means absolutely nothing. It didn't stop the last corrupt individual, in fact he was just reelected and is as corrupt, if not more, than before.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gotta pretend they are doing something

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Who exactly? Who is pretending they are doing something?? Is it democrats you’re accusing of pretending to do something?

How about maybe you try reading the article next time instead of chiming in with edgy nonsense.

It is a non partisan group called Free Speech for People. You’d have known that had you read the 1st paragraph of the article.

Oh. And while we’re on the subject of pretending… even if you were right and it is the democrats pretending- at least they pretended to do something. Because so many of you flat out admittedly did nothing.

And look what that got us.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Impeachment is pointless when the republican traitor filth control more than 1/3 of the senate. Suggest other solutions to dealing with trump.

[–] sbv 10 points 1 week ago

Imagine trying to win over the electorate instead. That'd be crazy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

Nothing news from an empty source.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Impeachment is irrelevant anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Impeachment has been of no consequence for more than half a century. Yet another demonstration that the US constitution is fucking idiotic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

What the fuck is impeachment anymore?

Growing up and learning Nixon resigned because he was impeached and made him look terrible I thought it was career ending. Like they'll drag you out of the white house career ending.

Now it just feels like telling a toddler "NO!" but with no consequence when they keep going anyway.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Surely, this time, impeachment will have consequences!"

Even if it passes, he will never be removed from office. There is no low that Trump can sink to where Republicans will not fall in lockstep with him. It's pointless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

FFS no. All it did the last two times was help him, because impeachment is basically impossible and he's going to "win".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm starting to think these Democrats aren't taking this seriously

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

It isn’t the democrats.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

They think they're going to win next time 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This was a look I was hoping only Republicans would champion. Ceremonial impeachments etc. One little trick i hope they master is shutting down the government just because they felt like it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Ah yes i remember these exact news at this time during his first term

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Good. They should get rid of him by any means necessary.

load more comments
view more: next ›