Believe it or not, there's a relevant xkcd
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
967 points (99.0% liked)
People Twitter
6878 readers
1346 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Xkcd is the rule34 of information
Because of course there is. It’s a good one too. Lol
This one is honestly baffling 🤣
there's always a relevant xkcd
Sometimes I wonder how some people look at a topic and know that there is a relevant xkcd and exactly which one.
I don't know about people in general, but in my case it's a simple case of me thinking "that reminds me of something", then figuring out that what it reminds me of is an xkcd comic, and then finding the comic 🤷
In this case, it was pretty much inevitable since it's one of my all time favorites 😁
Too many wolves? Believe it or not, release more wolves.
So true. IIRC about 40% of Yellowstone wolf mortalities are from other wolves in territorial disputes (stat either from the books „The Killing of Wolf Number 10“ or „Wolf Nation”).
Releasing more wolves is a possible solution to too many wolves.
Wolf Nation
Or as it's known amongst fans of teen bestiality: Team Jacob
Exactly what I was thinking of.
Too much gun violence, release wolves with guns.
Release Omega level Wolfs
Wanna lose weight? That's right; Wolves.
I have two wolves in me, and they're both fat-asses.
I'm a little concerned about the wolves.. in you 😳
Considering they're on yiffit, that may well be a reasonable concern.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Instructions unclear: Gave wolf offering of table scraps and warm place by fire, now have dog that barks at twigs
Greedy CEOs? You better believe it : wolves!
Just release them straight into the board meetings.
I have a friend who works as a park ranger in upstate NY. Every year the rangers have to cull the deer, but they use rifles. He said the problem is the only natural predator deer have in the area is the automobile.
I'm in Utah, and we drove out the wolves like 100 years ago and coyotes have a bounty, so we're being overrun with deer. As a result, it's really easy to get a deer tag here, since we need some way to cull the population, but it's still not enough. We're finally reintroducing wolves, but it'll take a while for things to rebalance.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Exactly why I got no beef with deer hunters. How are there not enough humans doing that in NY?
The park is surrounded by residential neighborhoods. No hunting allowed for miles.
Most of them unintentionally hunt deer with their cars, from what my friend tells me. He said Pound Ridge has an absurdly high number of car accidents involving deer when compared to similar towns, hence the local support for culling.
Wolves? More wolves.
Undercook fish? Wolves. Overcook chicken? Wolves. Miss a dentist appointment without cancelling? Wolves.
What's this? A handsome family picnic woefully underpopulated by wolves?
A large influx of wolves ought to put a stop to that!
Helpful Tip: in a pinch, other predators will do, but they should be spec’d up for lethality if facing larger prey.
Source: Fox that attacked congressman and others near Capitol had rabies, officials say
Reminds me of one of my friends who is in his 50s and still obsessed with wolves like an elementary school kid. He non-ironically wears lots of wolf t-shirts and has his house decorated with tacky posters of them, etc.
I roll my eyes at it, but he's pretty fun to hang out with.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Nova has an episode about the need for multiple predator species. Keeps all of the animals in their roles.
Wolves, lions, bears, and cheetahs.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The amazing thing is, that would actually solve all three situations.
In a bloody, slaughter sort of way, but still. Solved.
Wolves would have to be real hungry though
Reminds me of a Louis CK bit about releasing lions back into society and how much more life would be better. You couldn't sit around and eat, you'd have to graze and look out. Okay I'm doing it injustice but I also can't find it on YouTube anywhere for some reason, but it was good bit.
Wolves can help you lose all of your weight.
Weight loss aficionados have to shop at wolf-infested grocery stores.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Finally, someone makes sense.
I am pro wolf gyang
Limit it to atrocities against nature and i'm game.
To much pollution is controlled by releasing wives(edit: Wolves) into mansions and penthouse apartments, not warehouses.
Encourage the people making the bad decisions to make better ones.
Edit: I dont know what autocorrect was doing.
Releasing wives into mansions and penthouse apartments would probably result in more pollution from all the deliveries.
Sounds like one fix for all type maga thinking.
Wolfs do seem to be the answer to a lot of problems.
view more: next ›