It’s the media, not the people. If you read the same article from sources across the political spectrum, you’ll find the further right you go, the more information is omitted and the more opinionated the journalist becomes. So, someone who reads primarily right wing and centrist media will naturally have a right wing opinion when reading centrist articles.
disguy_ovahea
I highly recommend his books of poetry and illustrations. They’re often marketed to kids, but they’re absolutely for all ages.
It reminds me of Shel Silverstein’s illustrations
That’s true, but I also think it’s important to note that he was posting about a pedophile who was banned from the MLB for betting against his own team.
He was banned for life for gambling. A few times, he bet on or against his own team.
He also had sex with a 15-year-old when he was in his 30s.
https://www.phillymag.com/news/2024/10/01/pete-rose-death-legacy-gambling/
I had one of those for years. A standard, outdoor rated extension cord will plug right into the back of that trimmer. Bring it with you to the hardware store to make sure the female plug fits into the recess.
There were hundreds in NYC.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/07/us/new-york-coronavirus-victims-refrigerated-trucks/index.html
I see your Smith & Wesson, and raise you women’s rights to their bodies.
Surely named after the famously tall people of Brobdingnagia
I think the problem lies in the underestimation of the potential for that level of personal data. The privacy counter-argument is usually “nothing to hide.” Psychographic profiling is the incredibly accurate practice of predicting an individual’s engagement based on previous choices, and is far more invasive than “telling secrets.”
and Cheart
Opinions are absolutely subjective, but the content they’re based on is also skewed.
If all of the news you consumed was curated through an engagement algorithm, it would change the way you see the world. Your opinions would be based on that perception.