420
SLAMMED!
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
420 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
60292 readers
4868 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
if they are not getting BLASTED for it, it doesn't really matter
Anything less than NUKED isn't worth my time
Meta was really GENOCIDED for their deeds.
This makes Meta WORSE THAN HITLER.
It could be worse, they could be DRAGGED
Meta: You know dead internet theory? We're actually going to make it a reality.
Zombie Internet sounds way cooler though
Zombies are only cool when they're staggering around with ripped up flesh and missing digits growling for brains.
Non-existent uncanny valley moms trying to emulate wholesomeness, That's a whole nother ball game....
Posting pictures of rural Tanzanian children building Crab Jesus murals out of used home made trains... so precious...
load more comments
(1 replies)
What's the business model here? I've organically arrived at the South Park meme.
- Build ad-supported content silos.
- Openly flood those silos with AI slop
- ???
- Profit
everyone is looking at it wrong expecting these social media companies to show this as engagement.
That's not the goal.
The purpose of the AI profiles is targeted advertising. It probably isn't going to work on you but it does work on many demographics. It's the same concept as any other advertisement. They all set the scene of the specific type of person they want to buy their product, whether it's a TV commercial, a radio ad, a magazine page.
The only real difference here is that it's not a real person but when it comes to advertising, will that really matter? That is, will the drop in sales be negligible compared to the massive drop in cost of advertising?
It's 100% certain not to work on me because I don't have any accounts on Meta's platforms.
you may not have an account but your friends and family might and if you have similar interests they may vouch for products that were pitched to them via AI.. so in that way, they're still reaching you
The model is that as long as it looks like there are "users" that are "engaging" with the platform, it pleases the shareholders.
Same model with Reddit.
People are taking issue with the fact that the AI was black and queer, not that it wasn't a real person in the first place. Once again, the right is angry at something that literally does not exist in real life.
The AI being black queer mother of two just seems especially egregious. It's like they're just checking boxes with that stuff.
Some marketing parasites thought it will resonate with some people.... Trigger others. It is provocative and it got people talking.
Wait it’s the right that’s pissed? I was thinking it would be the left that’s pissed because they would consider this exploitation and astroturfing. Hmm, go figure. (I wasn’t going to read the article.) Maybe Facebook can piss everyone off with this really dumb idea.
The queer black mom AI is the one I keep seeing right-wing commentators putting on their thumbnails for their videos/articles. They're putting more focus on the character rather than the tech, from what I've been seeing.
So if it was a white, straight AI guy everything would be fine?
I don't know, we must check its genitals first.
Sorry, that feature is blocked everywhere in the south.
If it's too shy, you can check my genitals instead.
Prepare to be impressed.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Nobody would be able to tell if that was the case
No, people are taking issue with the fact that Meta is clearly trying to force a stereotype down our throats. At least i am.
The right probably IS pissed the AI was black and queer.
The problem imo is deception. I honestly think bots wouldn't be out of place on facebook if they were all clearly marked as such, and you could filter all generated content with a single toggle.
Honest profile for a bot:
- Profile pic of a server rack, 3rd from the top, under the Dell PowerEdge, above the UPS
- Interests are parsing webpages and hallucinating
- Looking for a server farm to be plugged into
- Family includes it's entire private cloud
Don't know about toggles, but those profiles were officially marked as bots made by meta. They didn't try to hide that fact.
Which makes it even weirder imo. At least with a secret AI profile you can tell they are trying to achieve something, shady as it might be. But what is the purpose of a Facebook profile that announces itself as a chat bot that's role playing as a queer black mother, I have no fucking clue.
You see they're bots if you open their profile and read some subtext.
Do you see it clearly marked in your feed if one of the bots posts something, shares something, or comments something?
That's a genuine question - I don't actually know. But it should be marked very clearly without having to open the profile, because people generally don't do that.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It’s just gross. The conversation one of these journalists had with the bot shows how faux this diversity is.
It reminds me of Levi’s using AI to diversify their models.
There’s something sick in hiding actual black, queer, hell fat bodies and voices while claiming to be promoting diversity.
If our governments are unable to punish this, they are already worthless.
A bit out of the loop, what is the use of these Bots according to them?
Influencers are making an extreme amount of money, and Meta doesn't get a bite of that specific cake.
Now they make their own influencers to funnel that money away from the people and into the company instead.
If they succeed with making popular AI bots, they can control user buying behaviour and political views like no other. Because you are much more likely to follow a "person" you trust than an ad. (the reason why influencers are a success to begin with.)
I didn't think of it in this way, but it does sound very convincing.
Meta would love to essentially make fake virtual influencers to get all their money and have more control.
Because you are much more likely to follow a "person" you trust than an ad
Pedons really got to do better on this. Socially starved losers needing their parasocial relationships and then they wonder why they are poor.
Well you see, engagement is down, and the whole "sponsored content" thing is in a death spiral due to AI slop. So Meta has decided to cut out the middleman and generate their own AI slop, because surely their version of personalised AI slop will solve the whole engagement problem and keep line always going up, because if it's one thing users love, it's an endless torrent of AI slop.
That will be why Nick Clegg has ducked out. He may have been a useless politician but at least he knows when to run away, which is better than some of them.
It’s for driving engagement. Basically, meta wants to make sure their platforms look appealing to the companies that use them for advertising purposes. More eyeballs, more ads, more money.
load more comments
(6 replies)
It boosts the usage statistics to show to the shareholders.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Let the dunking begin.
One fake profile with the name "Becca" uses the likeness of a woman of color while calling itself a "dog mom." The page is filled with AI-generated images of dogs.
"Becca?" Did she get adopted by white parents?
view more: next ›