this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
85 points (92.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35931 readers
1035 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This community is bizarre and probably the most genuine one I've stumbled upon. How do I consistently get more comments then updoots here?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Theoretically, yes. In practice, no. Suppose bla becomes a everything word. If anyone asks what bla means, you say it means bla. The other person won't understand, you persist on bla bla bla meaning bla means bla, by which bla can mean anything and you realize that it just doesn't work, because if it "means anything", in reality it means nothing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You seem to be looking for the word fuck.

[–] ricecake 70 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Smurfing hell... I thought I was going to be the smartass in this thread.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Edit: I just have to bitch about a stupid website called GIFer that uses mp4 not gif... Stupid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Some of these GIF hosts can be pretty obtuse. I was able to get at this GIF by going to the embed page and clicking/tapping the "copy link" button. In this case, the only difference in the two URLs was the file extension.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

☹️😐🙂😐☹️😐🙂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Yes yes, yes yes yes. Yes, yes yes yes yes, yes yes yes!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

The simple answer to your question is no. Language is as much about distinction and exclusion as it is about description. The word "circle" stands for the description and properties of the circle, but would be incoherent if it did not also exclude straight lines.

You can often find examples where some things are considered premium or desirable not for the properties is has, but for what it lacks. Just think of all the products marketed to not have something like BPA, fat, sugar, Carbs, gluten, asbestos, lead, and even cruelty.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The the the the the, the the the the the the the the; the the the the the the.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Professional academic linguist here. (Yes, that's a thing.)

Words have the meanings that communities apply to them. There is no governing body over word meanings. There can be a tension (e.g. two groups using the same term in different ways), but that doesn't really mean that the word means both. Words mean different things to different groups. It has to be this way, for epistemic and pragmatic reasons.

In that sense, meanings are not consciously assigned. So the answer to your original question could be "no".

But in another sense, all meanings are possible for any given meaningful sequence around the world. Which means, in principle, given infinite communities of practice, a word could have infinite meanings. A stretch, of course.

Edit:

There is no governing body over word meanings

I'm speaking here in terms of global English. There are some languages that have governing bodies, or at least bodies that claim to be governing bodies, like French with the Académie Française. But this is not at all the norm.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or, to put it another way, (unprofessional academic linguist here), a word has meanings by what you mean by it, and what the listener understands it to mean.

In a sense, it can mean anything you want it to. In another sense, it can mean anything the listener/reader interprets it as. Most useful though is when you mean the same meaning that the listener understands.

And for "accepted/official meaning", that's just a community all agreeing on a meaning. Optionally with a recognised group (e.g. dictionary writer) affirming certain meanings as accepted in the community.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Professional academic linguist

🧐

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It means I'm not a translator and I don't work on one particular language (which is typically termed as an academic linguist), but I'm also based in industry.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I am Groot.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not really. A word with every meaning is meaningless itself, since it doesn't allow you to narrow down the word's intended meaning from the set of all possible meanings.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

[audience looks around] 'What just happened?' 'There must be some context we're missing.'

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago
[–] dnick 4 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yes, literally.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Came here looking for this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

My squantch in squantch you can't squantch that in public.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Let me introduce you to Goptjaam, probably the closest "language" that fits what you mean: https://youtu.be/ze5i_e_ryTk

[–] SomeAmateur 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

sounds skibidi

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ACK! ACK ACK ACK ACK. ACK ACK.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah here and AskLemmy get so many replies I’ve sadly had to abandon a few posts due to the sheer number of replies. I really like to reply to everybody that takes the time to comment but in swear I’ve had posts with 400+ comments and I feel overwhelmed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Im just glad I really didn't need an answer for this one and have just been enjoying reading the replies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

There's a sci-fi horror story in there somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In theory, yes. In practice, no.

The association between meaning and word is arbitrary, but socially dictated. You'd need to have other people accepting that that word conveys that meaning in at least some context.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There's a sci-fi movie from USSR, "Kin-dza-dza". The natives of another planet in another galaxy were telepathes, but used language consisting of only a few words. "Koo" was for almost any word, "kiu" for swearing, "ketse" for matches (most valuable asset) and a few more. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin-dza-dza!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

May I mambo dogface to the banana patch?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

That's what the word "aught" means. Literally "anything at all."

Dragon's Dogma really loves using it for just about any meaning, too, which is why I had to look it up lol

[–] skulblaka 6 points 4 days ago (4 children)

That's "jawn" in Philly. It can stand in for literally any object. "These jawns are expensive" "Make a left at the jawn" "Jawn said he ain't coming" "This jawn is packed"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›