this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6763 readers
493 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

descending speed between 15 m/s and 20 m/s

I'm assuming that they put larger parachutes on the thing before putting humans inside.

Also, the vehicle itself could easily land in a location from which it couldn't be extracted (either because of a lack of suitable equipment or because of the location being virtually inaccessible). Several experiments were done in the 1970s in order to find a way to circumvent these limitations, including dropping the BMD with the two key crew members, the driver, and the gunner, seated inside the vehicle during the descent.

That, on the other hand, seems harder to resolve.

"On the down side, instead of losing a BMD in an inaccessible swamp, we've now lost a BMD containing several soldiers in an inaccessible swamp."

"On the up side, our responsibility only covers air logistics and ends once we've delivered the hardware to the soldiers on the ground. Now it's a ground forces problem."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As the BMDs are fully amphibious, it should be able to be driven and move after landing even in a swamp. Then, the core crew can collect the other crew members at their individual locations.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 15 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] TheMightyCanuck 12 points 3 months ago
[–] Tar_alcaran 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Landing at 20m/s, which is roughly the equivalent of jumping down 2 meters. Without bracing, or seeing when you hit. While sitting.

[–] fist_of_fartitude 1 points 3 months ago

Apparently, the solution to this is retrorockets -

Once clear of the plane a single large main chute opens. The deployment of the main chute triggers the deployment of four long rods which hang beneath the pallet. As soon as the rods touch the ground fires, slowing the BMD to a descending speed between 6 m/s and 7 m/s and giving it a relatively soft landing. This system entered service in 1975 and allows a BMD to be relatively safely parachuted with both the driver and the gunner.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

apparently retrorockets were used (sometimes)

[–] verity_kindle 4 points 3 months ago

Love this meme, as it needs little translation across cultures/languages. Keep being excellent and we'll make you the Shah of Moscow.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Fortnite battle royal.