this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
661 points (97.0% liked)

People Twitter

5287 readers
1925 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I miss azumanga

[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Although filling an entire trunk full of peanut butter, let’s say 500kg worth (assume a 450 litre trunk and density of 1.1 kg/l according to Google), then adding all that weight over the rear axle would affect the handling and balance of the car, potentially making it dangerous and therefore illegal to drive.

So, it’s not actually that clear cut that it wouldn’t be illegal!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

That reminds me:

My mom's from way out in the country. The first and only time she was stopped on suspicion of drunk driving was when she had an entire butchered pig from her parents in the back of her station car making it swerve.

And that was less than 1/4 the weight of that peanut butter collection 😄

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Who is buying a car that can't safely transport 500kg of peanut butter at any given moment??? Come on people need that trunkbutt on the go

[–] Rekorse 2 points 2 months ago

Sorry for being american but 450 pounds in the trunk in my mirage made it drive considerably different.

[–] Trollception -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Most SUVs cannot handle the weight, let alone a car. A typical SUV will allow for 200-300 lbs in the trunk. At least according to the GVWR and with 2 passengers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Obviously all serious car buyers shop for sexy, maneuverable dump trucks.

[–] Trollception 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's why there are so many baby killers on the road, peanut butter!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

500kg of PB is NOT an appropriate substitute for a proper baby car seat.

Sadly big pb has tried to make it seem like PB is the solution to all issues. But really, it's just for that one thing

[–] Trollception -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whoever is down voting me should actually go out and check what the GVWR of their vehicle is and the curb weight + fuel and passengers. It's surprisingly low even for a full sized SUV unless you own a body on frame SUV. Sure you can exceed the GVWR but you are potentially endangering others on the road with increased braking distances and poor handling.

[–] taladar 1 points 3 months ago

You should look up those values on SUVs vs. regular older cars. I can almost guarantee that many older cars allowed you to transport more than most modern SUVs.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like to imagine that it's not jars of peanut butter. Just raw peanut butter, sloshing around when it's warm.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Shhhhhh. I can only get so erect.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I got a bunch of free Coca-Cola once, and some dude at taco bell overheard me say something about "all the coke I have in my trunk". He then tried to sell me some of his coke.

[–] can 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Does someone with a trunk full of coke really need the taco bell guy's supply anyway?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

You would think that, if you’ve never used coke

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh, that's why people go to Taco Bell

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Either that or because it's a delicious treat

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I fully expect a cop here might arrest you over that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Civil Asset Forfeiture is one hell of a drug.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They would totally steal my hundreds of pounds of loose peanut butter.

But I was thinking more along the lines of how the police have no legal requirements to know the law or what doesn’t violate it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

police have no legal requirements to know the law or what doesn’t violate it

Broadly speaking, that's true. Narrowly speaking, their job isn't to adjudicate your behavior, just to identify and report certain behaviors that might be criminal. Prosecutors are supposed to know the law and determine whether an actual violation has taken place, then press charges or drop them, accordingly.

But because going through the legal process is expensive - both in terms of time and monetary cost - any interaction with the police that results in an alleged offense sets an enormous burden on the accused. And because our legal system is heavily privatized, police bias can result in huge economic tolls put on people who "look suspicious".

This is why its so hard to get good fresh peanutbutter in America, today.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Time to civil asset forfeit DEEZ (pea)NUTS

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is this peanut butter in little jars, big jars, bags, or just shoveled in like one giant trunk tub of creamy peanut butter?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Plastic shopping bags, untied

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Oh so like how you stock up on gas when there's a shortage.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The real crime is creamy peanut butter

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If it was meant to be chunky it wouldn't be called butter

Is the phrase "butter rough" or "butter smooth"?

[–] reev 17 points 3 months ago (4 children)

In Dutch it's called Peanut Cheese

[–] spinne 10 points 3 months ago

I can't tell if I love this or hate it

[–] restingboredface 7 points 3 months ago

I'm physically sick from this term.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

To me, that implies that it's been fermented/cured somehow, which just raises more questions.

Edit: Whoa.

[–] reev 5 points 3 months ago

They specifically mention the savory uses and the Dutch I've met do love their satay sauce, a savory peanut butter sauce.

[–] fsxylo 2 points 3 months ago

Hey, you can charge good money for a "butter rough".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Only cavemen eat insufficiently crushed peanut butter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

U like chunky normal butter?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Butter with salt crystals is crunchy butter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Now if it was crunchy peanut butter, I woulda accused the guy of being a pervert.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cop: You a spoon, shovel, backhoe, or “all of the above plus some” kinda person?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 3 months ago

Whatever gets it in the hole the easiest. I prefer a douche bag and a thicc tube.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Second person next to a second car filled with milky chocolate: But hitting me was a crime.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

I’m sorry, but this to me is same type of humor as those rage comics