this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
711 points (98.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6669 readers
646 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

There's definitely other life out there, but given a basic understanding of space and light speed travel, there is a zero chance we've made contact with non Earth life. The government has a direct benefit in claiming aliens or UFOs when testing their super military tech so our enemies are mislead on our militaries capabilities.

Like when trump posted a classified satellite image. Our population and all other governments had no idea we were capable of such clear satellite surveillance.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On the contrary, I'd recommend looking up the Fermi paradox. It exists because if we assume that ftl is impossible, both in a literal and effective sense, a civilization with the capability of long-range subluminal travel would still have the ability to colonize the galaxy within a few million years.

Now, you might be tempted to think, "okay, so a few million years from now is when we'll start seeing them", but that's assuming they took as long as we did to evolve intelligence. If I'm not mistaken, there's some speculation that dinosaurs were a significant contributor to delaying the rise of mammals, and those were around for over 100 million years. What if a civilization skipped the "oppressed by giant lizard-birds" stage? The result is that they'd potentially be millions of years ahead of us technologically.

Also, because I regularly see this question pop up in any conversation involving aliens,

"why would they come to our world? They've probably got everything they want!"

Why does a human want to explore the ocean? Why does a human want to explore space? Curiosity. Maybe they want to see it for themselves instead of looking at pictures that their friends posted on Spacebook. Maybe we're small and adorable to them. There are plenty of reasons why they might check our world out that don't involve conquest, genocide, slavery or other symptoms of rampant capitalism and authoritarianism.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why would they send a probe to inspect ships from a visible distance? They could fulfill all their curiosity from lightyears away

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Fermi Paradox is based on our understanding of physics, largely based in a 3 dimensional universe/reality. If these things are inter-dimensional, do those same rules apply?

What if physical distance, as we perceive it, is something unique to us as beings that perceive and navigate the universe in only 3 dimensions?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Swarms of von Neumann probes traveling at 0.1c would cover the galaxy in a very short timeframe...in galactic terms.

It also makes zero sense to test craft in a navy training range.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

What would the point of that be? Just because something is possible doesn't mean it'll be done.

And do probes flying around in navy training ranges make sense? If they wanted to be visible they would be. If they wanted to hide there wouldn't be footage of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I still vote we are some sort of experiment for aliens to observe, and have been under the microscope as they watched us evolve from primal creatures to the death of the world as we advance with our destructive technologies.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One thing that doesn't sit right with me is the fact that galaxies cluster together in similar ways that neurons do. Reminds me of how individual ants are just one cog in a collective hivemind. We're all just ants doing our part to power a giant alien's brain.

At least that's the answer to life, the universe, and everything that I'm going with. It also explains multiverses. Multiple aliens, all living in their own society. Maybe their universe is the same. Just brains inside of brains inside of brains. Who knows how deep it goes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sockinacock 6 points 1 year ago

Personally my money's on we're one of the first, or our solar system is the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone of the galaxy and anybody who gets too close melts.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government has a direct benefit in claiming aliens or UFOs when testing their super military tech so our enemies are mislead on our militaries capabilities.

They technically are UFOs. They are objects, they fly, and they are unidentified.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not really unidentified. Someone knows what they are, just not us.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

That logic would apply to alien spaceships too though

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

there is a zero chance we've made contact with non Earth life

Yeah! Because heavier than air flight is impossible, and there's no way aliens could hold enough helium to fly to another planet!

(Our ideas about what is possible change as our technology advances)

[–] imaqtpie 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

People tend to misapply this argument frequently. It is definitely a bit excessive to say there is zero chance, but still.

It's less about what is possible, and more about what is likely. Our understanding of physics (and by extension, reality) is extremely advanced. There isn't much that is going to surprise us going forward. Even relativity and quantum theory didn't make Newtonian mechanics obsolete, they simply covered the fringe cases.

I just hate when people imply that we might suddenly learn that we were completely wrong about everything. It's dismissive of the scientists who have given their lives to bring humanity to this level of understanding the universe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think when people imply we might suddenly learn that we were completely wrong about everything they are actually talking about how fast science seems to evolve these days, at the very least the public's understanding of science.

I have coworkers with who i can talk about 3+ dimensions, quantum mechanics, time travel, uap and while none of us are experts in any of those fields it no longer feels like we should be wearing a tinfoil hat simply for being fascinated by such topics because we now understand these are real (nuanced) scientific topics and not "something from the movies".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] corq 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's okay to be 'wrong' in science within the observable world, much of Newton's theories were rendered nearly obsolete by Einstein, but Newtonian physics was "good enough" until technology improved, and was "good enough" for most of his generation and later:

"While general relativity has been more precise, Newtonian gravity is still incredibly accurate and can be used for simpler situations. General relativity uses complex calculus that makes it difficult to compute. But Einstein has opened up the world to more complex physics, like black holes and gravitational waves that continue to develop our understanding of the universe. " https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/educators/programs/cosmictimes/educators/workshops/docs/InquiringIntoNatureUniverse/Newton_Einstein_FactCards.pdf

Epistemology allows for us to work within the framework of knowledge we currently have until something better is proven to be the case.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still believe that the image being posted was 100% planned by the powers to be to show we have the ability to do it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the intelligence field this is known as a bad move.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She’s wearing the cat from the original meme.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Kamala energy ⚡

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a few references I've seen regarding aliens today. I'm feeling out of the loop, would anyone explain?

[–] fist_of_fartitude 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A former intel officer testified to a house committee that the US has had a UFO retrieval program for years, and that we've recovered non-human "biologics" from the crash sites. He has no direct knowledge of anything, by his own admission, but he's willing to provide more detail to congress in a secure facility.

I'll keep the possibility open, I guess, but it sounds like absolute bullshit for a variety of reasons.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Those aliens must be really shit pilots if they keep crashing on Earth

[–] fist_of_fartitude 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imagine developing interstellar travel and not taking the time to teach you guys how to drive.

[–] Corkyskog 4 points 1 year ago

What if it's just teenagers taking the craft out for a joyride.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Alien drunk drivers 👽🍺

[–] winterayars 6 points 1 year ago

They make it however many billions of miles out here to Earth and then crash on the planet. How embarrassing for them.

[–] tyrefyre 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like that dog the Russians sent up? That would be nonhuman.

[–] fist_of_fartitude 9 points 1 year ago

Hitting a pasture and landing in cow shit would account for "non-human biologics." I'm incredibly skeptical.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The U.S. recently passed a law requiring the government to start disclosing all known(lol) information on UFOs/UAPs. The first congressional hearing was yesterday but was basically a verbal redacted/censored CIA document from the 60s.

About half of what was asked was responded with "I can't say in public."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

passed a law

Are you sure?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

https://www.congress.gov/amendment/118th-congress/senate-amendment/797/all-info#actions

I believe it's this amendment to the funding bill that was passed yesterday. Unless there was another bill I'm not aware of

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The Shitpisser, the Pride of the fleet!

load more comments
view more: next ›