julietOscarEcho

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] julietOscarEcho 8 points 1 month ago

Only has a fraction of the strategy and deck building of the actual TCG. Just seems like the usual mobile garbage to me (stamina mechanics, a million currency types, pay to win), shame.

[–] julietOscarEcho 3 points 1 month ago

Quick Google suggests healthcare costs for obese people are <50% higher than non-obese and the US has 15-30% more obesity than these countries. So maybe 15% at most of the 100% higher cost per capita of healthcare is obesity related. The killer for me for that hypothesis is that within the set of countries with normal healthcare costs, there's huge variation in obesity (10% in France to 30%in ireland) with limited variation in cost.

Maybe the life expectancy side does have more to do with obesity?

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 1 month ago

"As usual with those sorts of memes, the numbers are completely wrong. European nations spend around 11-12% of GDP on healthcare vs about 17% for the US. So you'd likely pay significantly less (about 30% less)"

Dis you?

[–] julietOscarEcho 8 points 1 month ago

It must really suck to be a good hearted doctor in that system. When every incentive is to push unnecessary interventions and you must encounter patients that can't or won't accept your help because it would ruin them or their family financially.

[–] julietOscarEcho 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Really USA, how does anyone pretend this is OK?

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

OK cool, well if "someone is wrong on this Internet" is more important to you than making a case for a better health are system (that I note you have spent 0 energy on) I think I'm done. Thanks for the entertainment of "$5k per person is 30% cheaper than $10k" though, that was a good one.

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So when the meme was wrong about 5% vs 20% it was "outright lying" but when you were shown to be wrong about your 30% you just continue on your high horse. Cool beans.

Not a political issue for me anymore thank goodness. Lived in the US for a while but very glad that public health is available for everyone where I live now (as is literally everyone else I know).

I mean private healthcare is strictly worse for everyone except business owners (and doctors without morals I guess). So that's my best guess at your motivation, but please correct me. Why?

[–] julietOscarEcho 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

"30% less" 😂 US GDP (it said % of pay, but let's play your game) per capita is 1.5x or more European countries, so try at least 50% less. It's a meme, it's not meant to be accurate, but if you're going to be a pedant at least be right.

Not to mention the lower cost is like 3rd on the list of reasons why public health care is amazing. Why you our here shilling for big business pal?

[–] julietOscarEcho 3 points 1 month ago

"needs to be a balance" this is exactly the problem right. There is zero balance, to the extent that even projects that set out to be operated for the benefit of humanity (open AI, looking at you) get converted to just enrich the already ludicrously wealthy. The corporation is a lever to concentrate wealth. Really important projects being closely controlled by billionaires is the natural consequence of this. Their unfettered power puts us all at risk from their capriciousness.

[–] julietOscarEcho 3 points 1 month ago

Yup. Betfair in the UK didn't close or settle their 2020 market for months, even though the terms of the market were about who was declared winner on election night, and were long since met with 100% certainty. That was some very easy money.

[–] julietOscarEcho 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yup

Homeschooling: A comprehensive survey of the research, Robert Kunzman, Milton Gaither Other Education-the journal of educational alternatives 2 (1), 4-59, 2013

"A final consistent finding in the literature on academic achievement is that parental background matters very much in homeschooler achievement. Belfield (2005) found greater variance in SAT scores by family background among homeschoolers than among institutionally-schooled students. Boulter’s (1999) longitudinal sample of 110 students whose parents averaged only 13 years of education found a consistent pattern of gradual decline in achievement scores the longer a child remained homeschooled, a result she attributed to the relatively low levels of parent education in her sample. Medlin’s (1994) study of 36 homeschoolers found a significant relationship between mother’s educational level and child’s achievement score. Kunzman’s (2009a) qualitative study of several Christian homeschooling families found dramatic differences in instructional quality correlated with parent educational background. "

[–] julietOscarEcho 2 points 2 months ago

Absolutely. The othering is a symptom of this tribal politics-as-team-sport too. "They are bad because they are tanky/neolib/whatever". Leads to lazy argument. Sure there are people who are dogmatic and rude, who you'll probably end up blocking, but if we all gave each other a bit of grace the quality of discourse would surely improve.

4
Velo d'or (www.reuters.com)
 

Not a fan of that outcome. Can you be the "best" cyclist if you don't enter, let alone win any one day races?

 

But I want to see some RUNS tonight. Go pack go.

6
Il Lombardia (self.procycling)
 

Today had to be the worst case of group 2 syndrome ever. I refuse to believe that those guys couldn't take back time on Pog cramping and alone on the flat. Carapaz catching back up shows you how little effort they were putting in. Fair play to Pog for taking the opportunity but it's maddening to see it essentially gifted to him by a bunch of guys content to podium/top 10.

14
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by julietOscarEcho to c/packers
 

Probably no one here will learn anything from this, but it's a well written article with a couple of curveballs for me, like over half of NFL teams have threatened to leave for LA!

3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by julietOscarEcho to c/[email protected]
10
Holy hell (self.packers)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by julietOscarEcho to c/packers
 

What a roller coaster. I don't remember emotions like that since rodgers coming back on against the bears after injury.

 

I know everyone's down on the scheme but I really think if the pass rush comes through it could plug the deficiency against the deep ball and give us an above average unit this year.

What's our weakness? MLB as usual? Strong safety/ slot corner?

 

I'm curious how I'll feel seeing Aaron in that context. I'm rooting for the jets because they've been so laughably bad the deserve a run. But. I feel like I've overdosed on Rodgers BS so unless he's super straight laced (unlikely) or doesn't feature much I think it'll wind me up.

 

Today I received in the post a kit I had bought already. I think this is the acid test for unpainted models. If you can remember everything you have yet to paint you're good. Above that is verboten for me now.

Anyone else have a rule of thumb to keep themselves in check?

 

Pidcock going better than guys I would have rated above him. Fair play. Here's hoping he can go for 3 weeks.

 

I'm feeling a bit deflated as a neutral fan as it looks pretty sewn up unless Jonas has a crash/illness, but surprised there's not more chat about the stage. It was a barnstormer.

 

Can WvA catch up to Sagan in the count of 2nd places? I was surprised he only has 7 so far. Feels like more.

view more: ‹ prev next ›