julietOscarEcho

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] julietOscarEcho 2 points 6 days ago

The ones on whom I spied for weeks. 😂

[–] julietOscarEcho 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"AI slop is punk" has the ring of when brew dog claimed they were doing a "punk" equity offering. 😂

Vibe coding is dadaist. If you say so, but I figure intent matters...

[–] julietOscarEcho 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I once fired a 22 round through the middle of a polo mint without breaking it from 25m away. I framed that shit because likewise, knew that wasn't happening again. That's part of the fun of the sport as a an amateur, occasionally chance does funny things.

[–] julietOscarEcho 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do they send you hallucinations as if they were fact all the time? That's my current favourite.

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 1 month ago

Not quite never. You just need the tax rate plus marginal change in lost benefits/increased obligations to exceed 100%. For example there's a breakpoint in the UK around childcare over 100k income that makes it way worth salary sacrificing to get below if you have kids. I can imagine there are similar niche things for small businesses around audit requirements or whatever, but not enough of an expert to know.

[–] julietOscarEcho 1 points 1 month ago

"show people what they can do with it" - pushing so hard. Hammer in search of a nail...

[–] julietOscarEcho 28 points 1 month ago

"God, modernist literary fiction is so plebian." - anon probably.

Next he'll ask for "ulysses" and get mad when pointed to James Joyce instead of Homer.

[–] julietOscarEcho 4 points 1 month ago

Do you think sitting on your arse claiming there's nothing to be done is more or less demoralising than singing in the streets with like minded people?

Maybe you work different than most humans, but I think the answer to that is pretty obvious for the rest of us.

[–] julietOscarEcho 18 points 1 month ago

US economic output is more than adequate to achieve this already, but we choose instead to concentrate the benefits in the hands of a few.

Regarding tarrifs bringing back manufacturing: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/trumps-tariffs-what-is-behind-them-and-will-they-work "but this is very unlikely to work. Manufacturing has changed, with production now spread across multiple countries in so-called ‘global value chains’. Moving whole supply chains back to the US is going to be prohibitively expensive, result in rising consumer prices and make US-produced goods internationally uncompetitive. The model of manufacturing that underpins Trump’s approach simply hasn’t existed for the best part of 40 years, and is not coming back."

[–] julietOscarEcho 4 points 1 month ago

First pass googling this returns very low information quality. I suspect "calculable" is more more like it than "measurable" but would love to see a source where measurements had been made that showed this effect greater than standard error.

[–] julietOscarEcho 4 points 1 month ago

"If not duffers, won't drown. If duffers, better drowned."

[–] julietOscarEcho 11 points 2 months ago

Avoiding Gell-Mann amnesia! Unfortunately, to even get to this question you have to be expert enough in one area to see through the BS... Not a luxury everyone is afforded.

6
@ Bears (self.packers)
submitted 6 months ago by julietOscarEcho to c/packers
 

Really mixed bag play wise but will remember that one for a long time. Gary's eyes on the back to back sacks. Watson coming good and a fantastic finish. Phew!

4
Wicks' hands 😬 (self.packers)
submitted 8 months ago by julietOscarEcho to c/packers
 

Even on the TD he doesn't have a good handle. He cannot be getting this many targets going forward unless he shows he remembers how to catch.

5
Well fuck (self.packers)
submitted 8 months ago by julietOscarEcho to c/packers
 

Someone post updates on love when they see something solid? Backup is a fuckin wasteland, we'll need to sign someone right? Who's actually on the trade block?

 

It doesn't take a wealth of big names to make a sprint compelling huh?

 

They seem to just not really be covering it. No highlights show that I can find tonight and the tour of Denmark and tour de l'avenir are more prominent on the website. What gives?

 

I don't watch college so I don't have much context. I terms of positions taken it seemed kinda obvious with the departures on the line and the move to 4-3. Hopefully we got some impact guys, but anyone willing to bet on them before we see them in action?

 

Picking a winner is boring so let's talk about the real stuff.

Would be good to see G up there but unclear what form he's in. Bardet looks strong, maybe TT kilometers will be a problem for him? JuanPe maybe a spicy call after tour of the alps result?

4
QB wolf (self.selfawarewolves)
 

Yuck twitter. But:

3
Going to postseason? (self.packers)
submitted 2 years ago by julietOscarEcho to c/packers
 

Winnable rest of schedule so decent shot at a wildcard from what I can tell. Cowboys are nailed on. Vikings see the lions twice so hopefully out regardless of result against us. So probably two slots between us, saints, bucs and hawks for remaining 2 wildcards.

Not counting on beating the real contenders but some post season experience for Love would be great. We shot ourselves in the foot on draft capital though.

4
Woop (self.packers)
submitted 2 years ago by julietOscarEcho to c/packers
 

Last few games love looking like the real deal no? Wicks and reed coming through as viable targets really helping him out.

9
GCN Plus going away (www.globalcyclingnetwork.com)
 

Streaming sport just gets worse and worse. This was the only streaming service I would actually recommend to other people, and of course big corporates pull the rug to force us onto their shitty expensive platforms.

view more: next ›