this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
782 points (92.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2948 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A horde of trailer-park visigoths can sack the Capitol and Republicans say "what's the big deal?" But let one guy show up in casual clothes and they lose their goddamn minds.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 219 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

He can do it in a bikini, for all I care. Let’s not pretend Congress stands on decorum now.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or tradition. Or morals. Or principals. Or anything at all really. They just suck.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

I mean I suppose it doesn't stand on principals, either...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Didn’t one of them literally bring a big giant card with a photo of the president’s son’s dick on it for their speaking time?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Fascism has always been big on dressing fancy.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 171 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“If those jagoffs in the House stop trying to shut our government down, and fully support Ukraine, then I will save democracy by wearing a suit on the Senate floor next week.”

Lol, go git em Fetterman

[–] eestileib 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He added "Wouldya rather have a yinzer or an asshole up here? Your choice."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This is a losing issue for Republicans.

Do they think their base gives a shit about dress codes? Obviously not! But the fancy lads can't stand the thought of people not dressing correctly lol

[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Their base will get offended over anything & everything so long as it's not one of their own being criticized. They are forever hypocrites, and generally dumber than a box of rocks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

Something something tan suit!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They don’t give a shit about dress code. They give a shit about having an excuse to be angry about something.

I guarantee if some GOPer showed up in a stained wifebeater with camo shorts and crocs, they would be celebrated as ‘just like us’ and ‘a hero of the people.’

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 124 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"we must protect the sanctity of that place at all costs"

I fucking refuse to hear Republicans speak of sanctity after the shit they've pulled since 2015.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The sanctity of this place has been fouled.

-- John Fetterman and the warrior from Diablo 1

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago (16 children)

...Why are we allowing Daily Wire here?

[–] atzanteol 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same reason we keep seeing "mediaite" - I assume this community has no standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago

As she looked up from the crotch of the man she was manually ejaculating in public, Ms. Boebert was quoted as saying, "shorts is so bad, it's such disrespectful to the government and stuff".

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm just here to upvote the phrase 'trailer-park visigoths'. Carry on.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I like it, it has some metaphorical levels, but I'm torn because Rome definitely had it coming.

Hell, did you know the Visigoths allowed women to inherit property and noble titles? They were the woke mob destroying the literal patriarchy by 410 AD standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don’t give a fuck. What are we doing about the worthless traitor filth who salivate at the thought of installing a dictator?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

Destroying Democracy = A-okay!

Not wearing a suit = Unimaginably evil!

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Why do people care what they wear when congress is fucking us over regardless?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

Because without the illusion of decorum putting a degree of separation between the common man and the senator, people might start to realize that the ones fucking them over are just as regular as the rest of us and maybe start to think about doing something about it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

I think that's pretty much Fetterman's point. Well, that and that he'll wear whatever he damn well pleases.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So what, Ted Cruz is usually wearing a bodysuit out of human skin and nobody bats an eye.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's go back to powdered wigs, knickers and coat tails. I'm sure Mitch McConnel remembers those.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Mr McConnell, would you care to comment?”

“Well—”

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about this tasty lettuce leaf?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (6 children)

well, Obama once wore a beige suit 😯

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] eestileib 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Disgusting.

How could Schumer let somebody who OBVIOUSLY skips leg day preside over the senate?

What kind of example is he setting for the kids? How can I be expected to get my son to pound out squats to exhaustion before school if THIS is supposed to be a role model?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Dailywire is absolute trash anyway

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Daily Wire is doing fashion coverage now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I get that this guy rolls how he wants to roll but I just wish someone would buy him clothes that fit. They can be cool clothes, shorts and whatever, put on a hoodie, that's all rad but just make it fit

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he has such a strange body though he'd probably need to get something tailored, which kinda defeats the point of his style to relate average Americans.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So what? As long as he is decent I don't see any issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I get making the dress code more lax, no reason business casual should be unacceptable. And yeah, Republicunts are hypocrits as always. But are we sure about no dress code at all? People joke in this thread about congressfolks showing up in fursuits or banana slings, but how long is it until someone actually unironically tries that?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (12 children)

And the harm would be exactly what?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

They are angry they didn't think of it first and some working class people could be thinking hmmm this guy dresses like me maybe he isn't so bad like republicans say.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Well shoot, if this keeps up they might have to start trying to judge people by the content of their character instead of just their virtue signaling. Do you know how fast the system would fall apart if voters actually had to figure out what kind of person their representatives were?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Elect me to congress and I'll show up to the first session after my swearing-in wearing a $10,000 full-body fursuit, and I'll use my own money to buy it, not a single cent of taxpayer funding required.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

This is wonderful. That being said, why are we linking to The Daily Wire?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm surprised nobody showed up as a furry, or at the very least Boebert in a banana sling.

Let's show some guts damnit

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay. I have to say, I don't like the idea of making the US Senate more casual. Fetterman should be wearing a shirt and pants.

However, as far as I understand, this is still the Republicans fault for not being able to agree on what the wording of the rule regarding what clothing is appropriate. So if they don't like Fetterman's outfits, they still have themselves to blame here.

Probably an unpopular opinion but I stand by it.

load more comments
view more: next ›