For the second time in weeks, a Canadian icon has emerged as the unlikely victor in an existential battle on the ice.
Unlikely? Author has never met a goose it would seem.
For the second time in weeks, a Canadian icon has emerged as the unlikely victor in an existential battle on the ice.
Unlikely? Author has never met a goose it would seem.
I sure hope he listens to the courts. 🤞
People like dictators more than they will admit.
Lawmakers and experts warn of legal and operational chaos, questioning the administration’s strategy
Their what? 🤣 There's no strategy!
So? It's an amount everybody agreed to in 2014.
Every lawyer in the world: This is clearly unconstitutional.
Scotus: 5-4
It's not that - NATO membership includes an agreement to spend at least 2% of GDP on defense.
It's not sympathizing. It can't sympathize.
It's an interesting decision - I'm curious about the pros and cons of that choice. US States have a fair amount of power as well but that one is explicitly excluded in the constitution -- which makes a fair amount of sense to me, though maybe because I'm used to it. I can only imagine what we'd be going through right now if Florida could regulate trade with California.
But Trump might roll them back on Wednesday! And they're back on Saturday. But off next Tuesday! But then - tariffs next Thursday again!
That's how you do a business.