this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
173 points (97.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6659 readers
387 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

So....uhm.... what airdefence doing? It got tyred

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago
[–] Jumuta 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why do Russian jets all have to look gorgeous (su34, su30, su27, etc)

[–] SolOrion 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They had a specific point in their designs where literally everything was just a silver tube with wings. SU-7, MiG-19, Su-17, etc.

Seems like sometime after that they figured out how to make everything look badass.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Russian aircraft are like volvo. Suddenly one day the designers decided to use curves. What tubes is to russia, boxes are to Volvo.

Source: I own a '96 Volvo 940. Ot's a station wagon, and therefore one of the most aerodynamically challenged vehicles in existence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

SU-57 is the ~~best looking~~ sexiest. Its beauty cannot be hidden from an AA radar acreen.

[–] SolOrion 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed completely, the Felon gets me and my AA bricked up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In light of recent drone attacks, Russia has decided to cover their vulnerable aircraft in tires. One can only speculate on that decision making process.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

From what I read, I think it's that the drones and/or missiles that are used to attack the airbases quite deep in the mainland use a special form of homing equipment that is not depending on any outside signal, which could be disrupted for example gps. So those weapon system rely on infrared or other means of self homing equipment to manage the final approach on target. The tires are supposedly meant to disrupt the systems that use visual clues for final approach also disrupting thermal imaging, kind of like dazzle camouflage is intended to work on warships.

If that is effective or work in any way I don't know, but if it does it is a cheap and fast solution until a more broader defense mechanism is crafted.

If not, you haven't spend a lot on trying, to solely rely on it forever would be dumb, but to as a makeshift temporary solution I don't see much wrong with it, except that it looks silly. But just like the cage roofs on tanks personally I doubt it will have a meaningful impact.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Shouldn't they just park under a camo net canopy then?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

hangars are simply unknown technology

[–] Estiar 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more that all the hangers were built in the wrong place and are built next to an oligarchs mansion instead

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

damn, it's also somewhere around where all that Su-57 money went. coincidence? yeah probably

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do you know how many tires it would take to make that?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i like how it marks aircraft with tires as unused, because putting them on or off takes considerable time. one of these had even an engine missing, and according to some twitter accounts some of these aircraft weren't moved in years

so if it works as camo, it would only direct autonomous drone towards working aircraft. my feeble westoid mind simply can't comprehend vatnik logic

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Eh, just leave em on at takeoff, it will sort itself out.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you're seeing is ADVANCED WARFARE.

(It's tires. IDK why though, drunken vatnik logic ig)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They're being attacked on all sides, this is a radial defense. This has all weather capabilities (although they may want to change to snow tires in November).

[–] _haha_oh_wow_ 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

ERA - Emergency Reactionless Awfulness

[–] verity_kindle 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Tire fighter.

[–] Maddison 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

people! in all seriousness, does this work. I mean, if they are doing it, it must do something at least?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I got deployed to a spot where a company man came to help out with some logistics. We happened to be using some 50 gallon drums to help anchor down some comms equipment, which got us talking about the topic of 50 gallon drums.

The company man happened to also be a vietnam vet, and told me a story about some POWs that got captured there. The enemy was real keen on finding out how the americans were finding their ground compounds for aerial attacks.

These several POWs told the enemy that it was all of their diesel fuel 50 gallon drums that were lighting up on radar, and was giving away their position from dozens of miles away. They went on to tell the enemy that the only way to hide the drums from radar, was to bury them at least 3 feet below ground.

So there's the enemy, digging 6+ foot trenches to hide their diesel drums in. Digging trenches like that in the jungle is difficult enough, but even more difficult is then unburying them one by one when the fuel is actually needed.

So the POWs pulled that whole radar + drums story out of their ass, but knew that if they were believed, it was going to be a huge hindrance for the enemy hiding/accessing the drums like that.

So I have to wonder: Do the russians believe that throwing tires on their aircraft hides them from radar, or otherwise some other overhead asset from detecting them? It seems like it would be hindrance to scramble those jets when needing to chuck a bunch of tires off it first. Would be hilarious if some type of planted misinformation is responsible for this practice.

The question still remains though: Does this shit actually work?

[–] Maddison 1 points 1 year ago

Would be hilarious if some type of planted misinformation is responsible for this practice.

interesting! Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, the drone/artillery shell just bounces off. It even protects against Himars bee bees.

[–] Maddison 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean do they hide the bloody plane? Planes have a very noticeable outline perhaps they are trying to hide it. This way for a drone with low quality cameras, it might not look like a target immediately? And I am thinking these drones have humans sitting behind them and have bad cameras.

If the drones are programmed almost anything unexpected can put them off course. (Looking at you Million dollar russian missile hitting Ukrainian toilets)

Thinking the enemy is dumb is almost never a great plan and it certainly doesn't help you. Luckily for Ukraine, the people who think the enemy is dumb are sitting behind a computer and not inside a command post.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmmm, what is this pile of tires on the runway? There's no way it could actually be a plane /s

Also, the quote "we're so lucky they are so stupid" is from a Ukranian soldier. There are many battlefield examples.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

its just tired

[–] profdc9 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Once lit, yes. But they don't ignite that easily.

[–] verity_kindle 3 points 1 year ago

There's something so sad about the rutted concrete, the tires and the uncut grass in the image. Wouldn't a messy airfield give some cover to partisans doing a sneaky thing? Even the very small municipal airport, hair care 'n tire center near me looks better.