this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
220 points (99.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

7005 readers
350 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It's wild that thing was built in 1945. The first rudimentary computers had just recently been introduced, a lot of places didn't even have paved roads, logistics by horse were a norm and people still burned oil lamps indoors.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's in a fucking wooden framed shed. Practically a shanty. Humans are insane.

[–] anomnom 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That’s the temporary shed while they rigged it to be hoisted up the tower where it was detonated. You can see the pulley block attached to the top. Anything in that spot would have been temporary, whether they dismantled it or not, so wasting resources on a “better” structure would be silly.

It’s in the desert, so a shelter was probably necessary to keep things cooler and a bit cleaner.

[–] nuke 9 points 3 days ago

Tony Oppenheimer was able to build this in a shack! With a box of scraps!

[–] starman2112 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Humans are fucking wild man. We constantly push the boundaries of what's physically possible. What do you need to make a nuclear bomb? Some hot rocks and some math. What do you need to send someone to the moon? Fuel, oxidizer, an airtight box, and math. What do you need to get cars and electricity to the majority of people? Massive sociopolitical change and widespread adoption of new standards. Nukes are way easier than cars and electrical networks

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

took some big brains, dedicated in the pursuit or pure science

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Pure science. Or glassing a bunch of nazis. Then they surrendered so had to find someone else to use it on.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This picture predates the invention of the phrase "glassing" in this context by hours. It was an exciting time for etymologists.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Well we gotta nuke somebody"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Macarthur just twitched in his grave

[–] FeatherConstrictor 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is "the gadget," an implosion type nuclear bomb detonated in the trinity test, the first nuclear bomb test on earth (that we know of, heh).

It's shown partially assembled inside the 100-foot test tower where it would eventually be detonated.

[–] Tar_alcaran 6 points 3 days ago

And watched literally by the only single guy in the group, who had to by right next to it because something might go wrong overnight.

[–] FeatherConstrictor 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh awesome thanks for the info :D I'll have to read the Wikipedia page on it. Thing looks wicked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

That thing is a god

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Is that Cerebro?