this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
75 points (98.7% liked)

Games

16941 readers
320 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombiFrancis 8 points 15 hours ago

Disco Elysium refutes this take.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago

You can’t sell endless in-game micro transactions in a single player game. Gotta get to work on League of Fortnight: Apex of Duty

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Ummmm......Baldur's Gate 3, anyone? How about Dragon Age: Veilguard? Those are just off the top of my head.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago

Why are you citing mechanically rich games that happen to have a story?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Dragon age isn't a particularly good example. It was a massive flop.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't forget that everyone has a hard-on for Witcher 4.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Except for those neets complaining that Ciri isn't "hot" for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There are always gonna be complainers. Like, I'm not super happy that Ciri seems to have undergone many plastic surgeries in a world without plastic surgery (but hey, maybe she popped into our world!), but it is what it is. Hopefully they at least contacted the original actress, otherwise I'm gonna be pissed at them, but if she said no, not much you can do.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 1 points 32 minutes ago

Idk, they literally have magic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

Dude my GPU is so hard for Witcher 4 the fans started to hum "the bad touch" ever since the trailer ran!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Yeeah.. this sounds the usual "Why, why aren't these games selling?" fans screaming, explaining what's wrong, begging "Guess this kind of games just don't sell"

[–] Grumpy 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

BG3, yes. Massive success.

Veilguard is a massive flop. It sold a lot compared to other games, sure, but based on the amount of money they spent and time in development, that was a shit investment. They were expecting like 10m sales, doing 1.5 instead according to whistleblowers.

[–] Rekorse 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure it saved time starting from the template from Hogwarts legacy. The real problem is veilguard isnt an RPG. Divinity original sin 2 is a better game IMO.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

And from the same developer. It's almost as though who makes the game is just as important. 😉

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a shame. "Narrative-driven, story-rich games" are mostly all I play. Just because people spend more time in strategy or MOBA games doesn't mean they're more popular, just that they take more time and don't have a designated end point, so people come back to play more often. But we still enjoy story-rich games and they'll still sell.

This is why Call of Duty has turned to garbage. Because they realized they could get more gameplay out of the multiplayer mode, so they stopped making good campaign modes and focused all their energy on multiplayer and pushing microtransactions. It's literally prioritizing money over quality gaming.

And I know, they're a business and the goal is to make money, but who can remember a fun multiplayer level? What even is the point in getting invested long-term in multiplayer when they're releasing a new game every 1-2 years? Counter-Strike has been mostly the same for decades and was extremely popular because it was so well-known and hardly changed. It only recently released a sequel, which was basically just a huge patch to the original game. Meanwhile, my memory of Call of Duty multiplayer games is fuzzy because I've played so many over the years and none really stand out to me.

[–] Shiggles 15 points 1 day ago

Do they consider frostpunk a “story rich game”? If that’s what all story rich games were like, I’d play more of them - most of them feel like cereal box toys, and I’d generally prefer just reading a book so the subpar gameplay isn’t all I’ll remember.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they publicly traded? Being publicly traded is just the death of game companies, some decisions have to be based on more than profit.

They also have a really good universe in Frostpunk they could explore through other game-styles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

In the article they do post about "investor concerns"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Aren't they 99% of AAA games?