this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
199 points (97.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6763 readers
508 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This makes me deeply uncomfortable for reasons I can't adequately explain. Some real uncanny valley firearms shit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's bad enough just seeing such short, inefficient barrels.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 2 points 3 days ago

It's not about how big it is, it's about how you use it.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How the fuck would you unbullpup it? Flip the magazine and have 3cm of barrel for the bullet to jut out of?

[–] DannyBoy 15 points 4 days ago

They look like they should be in some offbrand Halo game.

[–] Rampsquatch 5 points 4 days ago

You have committed crimes against Skyrim and her people!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

unpups your bull

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

These come supplied with a massive padded vest to make up for the short distance between the end of the stock and the trigger.

But only for rightys.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

This actually looks pretty normal, aside from whatever abhorrence of a rifle that is on top, which looks like it's so utterly tragic in quality that (entire history of the L85)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

this is cursed

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Somthing is wrong, i can feel it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

AKA "pistolizing"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As an Englishman, I had no idea what the problem was. I used Google (an internet search-engine) to figure out what the post was about.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These rifles typically have the magazines loaded in the back by the stock. This is called a bullpup design. The advantages of this are to have a shorter rifle end to end while maintaining the same length barrel.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's what I was able to ascertain, I'm guessing it's about accuracy in a smaller gun?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Correct-a-mundo!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

This is some Hotdogs shit

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)