this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
34 points (87.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35882 readers
1124 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One person, with their AI, can create a fully animated show with audio and different voices done with the combination of the creator and AI.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some good stuff there. Not ominous at all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I have to wonder if generating that is burning money or making money.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

OP if you interested they started by parodying Seinfeld until the AI got a bit too ... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/feb/06/nothing-forever-twitch-ban-seinfeld-parody-ai

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Incredible. It's entertaining in the way watching a slow motion train wreck is entertaining.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks. I hate it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This is actually pretty funny.

"Silverware are spies in your kitchen and sporks are the double agents" -Manfred

[–] PlzGivHugs 21 points 1 week ago

Technically, it can and has been done already. The problem is that AI is very bad at creating new ideas and even worse at understanding what it has created (as is required for plots or jokes). As a result, any writting created with heavy AI influence tends to sound like a child's stream of thought with an adult's vocabulary, and any jokes rely purely on randomness or on repeating an existing well-known joke. Similarly with art and animation, because the AI doesn't understand what it is creating, it struggles to keep animation of elements consistant and often can't figure out how elements should be included in the scene. Voices are probably the strongest part, but even then, it can be buggy and won't change correctly to match the context of what is being said.

None of this is to say AI is useless. Its very good at creating a "good enough" quick-fix, or to be used to fill unimportant or trivial work. If used to help clean up scripts or fill in backgrounds, it can speed up the process greatly at minimal cost. It's a tool to be used by someone who knows the field, not to replace them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Probably technically possible now, but it's not going to be any good. If you mean "of the quality of what is available now," then it's still going to be a while.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Not too far, or its possible right now depending on jow you want to define "animated". I feel like there uses to be really low-budget cartoons on air which were really just still frames with some shake added, couple soumd effects, and voice acting. A lot like SolidJJ on YouTube now. Those wouldn't even be too hard to do, if the AI were just one tool in the set - could probably crank out a few a week, anyway.

If you're looking for twenty minutes of animation that doesn't shift around like a fever dream while you're watching it, maybe six to eighteen months. I do think human voice actors would be required, but you could do the music with Suno.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

A very long time hopefully.

[–] neidu3 6 points 1 week ago

As far as I know it is possible right now. There are some really impressive video generative AIs out there. Us regular people probably cannot do it, as nobody who runs such a model would let us use their resources to that extent.

But if someone with such a model decides to go all in, they could probably do so now. However, "now" does not mean instant. They could push the button now, and then the computers start to churn, and considering the size and complexity of a full movie it's going to take a while.

And then you have the first pass done. The first of what will probably be many. I find it hard to believe that you'd create the entire movie in one go. Because if the AI fucks up just a few details, the entire movie will be garbage. It is better to do it scene by scene, and then stitch them together afterwards. So you run multiple passes for every scene until you have what you want, you stich them together, and then do whatever else you need to do to release this end result.

I'm sure the NVIDIA and AMD CEOs are currently having wet dreams of someone deciding to do this, because it's going to cause GPU prices to skyrocket.

[–] Mandy 5 points 1 week ago

not a tv series but:
you are in luck, some "people" of chosen "Intellect" already made a movie!
https://youtu.be/KhQnnISdDIU

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

We could technically do it now, but you'd need a ton of quality control.

A basic workflow:

Use an image generator to generate start (and optionally end) frames of each scene.

Use a video generator like Runway to create the scene.

Use something to generate the speech, either a realistic text-to-speech engine or a record the dialog yourself and use AI voice changing software.

Use a lip synch AI to match the mouth flaps to the audio.

Generate music using something like Udio

Job done.

All these technologies exist and in some capacity are available to use. The only issue at the moment is consistent quality. This is coming on in leaps and bounds, however.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you say “by themselves”, you mean one person would still write the scripts manually, and AI would replace the grunt-work animation teams that shows like the Simpsons and South Park employ in East Asia?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I know The Simpsons sends the grunt work to East Asia, but I thought that South Park is so simple that a US team can bang out production with the writing staff within a week.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

As far as we are from the death of art I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

There's some slop on youtube that's either pure AI or really close to it. You need to delved deep into baby youtube to find it though. Five Finger Family would probably be a good starting point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I used to watch AI Peter quite a while ago, turns out it’s still live http://www.youtube.com/@ai-peter

I think it gets the text promos on its discord then it animated scenes based on the topic. Sometimes is funny as heck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

i think 5 to 15 years max.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm more worried about someone using AI to harvest the power of all these smart devices to record our daily lives in real time.

Like your samsung tv records what you watch, while you watch. Your samsung phone records gps of where you go, when you go, how often you go. The little voice assistant on android records your speech paterns, and is able to create a voice profile of you.

Your laptop/pc records what you do in real time, even with no software installed on your pc. Even if you use linux, because they're logging this data outside your control via the link between you and your isp.

The grocery store records what you buy, when you buy it, how often you buy it.

And all these companies start mingling, and sharing data between them. Which as of 2019 is totally legal. They build personalized profiles on you, using AI to collect all the data from the various sources, and ties it all in to one profile. So even though best buy shouldn't have any reason to know what day you got married, it knows because your wife registered 15 years ago at some bridal registry. Now best buy may not have any use for that info, but its part of your profile. And now everything in your life is documented, profiled, archived, and shared.

And it's not crazy. Most of this has been happening for decades. The only part missing is the AI to gather these individual profiles, and tie them into one collective profile, and seek information out to add to it.

What's your shoe size? AI adds data from that time you shopped at footlocker. What's your phone number? That was added from AT&T. Where do you work? That was gathered from Verizon when you used your place of work to get a discount 2 years ago, and your daily GPS records confirm. What's your mothers maiden name? That was added from a website you used this as a password recovery option on. Whats your pets names? This was taken from your vet.

All this info and data. Just out there seperately, and now AI can gather it, build a profile on everybody, track you in real time, and not have any oversight or responsibility because nobody is in charge of it. It's just data shared around.

Meanwhile you wonder about cartoons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Not all of this, you have some points in here (smart TVs are worth mentioning), but a lot of this is elsewhere, too, though. And was done before AI. A LOT of things are in public records, for instance. Yes AI and interconnectedness it makes it easier, but this is nothing knew. And the fact that they’re still this bad at targeted ads means there’s still hope.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What bootlicker down voted this...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't, but it comes off as preachy for a question asked in a community called "No Stupid Questions". A dumb question was asked about AI and the response was "actually, these are the things we need to be worried about because I'm very smart to worry about it".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Thank you for the feed back... as radicalized redditor, i did not pick up on that. I the analysis was pretty on point though so clearly needs to be more approachable.

@Lost_[email protected]

God damn, i know using bootlicker above prolly don't help either

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

People who don't think questions on nostupidquestions should be criticized for being stupid.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

Yep. That's a lot of words to try to seem superior to other people. Did you use ChatGPT to help you write it?