this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
183 points (98.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35536 readers
1927 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

You always hear the phase “9 to 5” and also the song with the same name. Assuming you include 1 hour worth of breaks (30 minute lunch and two 15 minute breaks), you’re only working for 7 hours a day which comes up to 35 hours a week.

Now it feels like you have to work 8 hours a day (for a total of 40 hours of actual work), plus your other time off meaning you’re really there for 9 hours each day (for a total of 45 hours). Am i looking at that wrong, or did expected times change, and if so, when?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Hour long mandatory lunch, no pay. Switzerland.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Switzerland is more like 8-11 12-18. Atleast for me. So more 8-6 than 9-5.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Half an hour mandatory lunch, paid. Austria.

(pretty much depends on your job a bit, just wanted to continue with the same comment style)

[–] [email protected] 58 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

You're thinking small-time, like an hourly worker. Good office jobs are generally salaried positions and the idea of clocking in and out is... not a thing. Some days you work more, some less, whatever needs to be done. The idea of 9-5 is just a general time frame. And no one gives a shit when you lunch or break. In a real profession the yardstick is, are you getting it done or not?

I'll catch grief for saying that, so I'll preempt by saying, if your job isn't like that, you likely have a shit job.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Gentle reminder that without "small time", hourly workers doing real labor your easy, sweatless, office job would disappear overnight. Perhaps some gratitude? Maybe even some solidarity?

As a former IT professional turned baker, I dislike the condescending attitude too many white collar workers have toward the actual wheel turners of the world.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 32 minutes ago

"doing real labor" "easy, sweatless, office job" "the actual wheel turners"

"I dislike the condescending attitude"

It never ceases to amaze me how often people see and hate shit in other people that they epitomize themselves.

And honestly, my experience has been the opposite and I see the condescending attitude, at least more openly, coming from blue collar workers more often.

[–] Lepsea 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Me laughing in salaried 9-5 with clock in and clock out. Pay deduction if i forget to do clock in or out even if everyone know i work that day. Got paid 50% less than people who did the same job same position who didn't need to clock in/out.

I have a shit job and the only thing that keep me going is the job close to where i and my family live so i can check on my sister (found out that she do self harm once and I'm scared to go faraway from her ever since).

Desperate people make a good cheap employee.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm "salaried," and union, but they 100% track our hours and if you use up your benefit time and take additional time off, you will not get paid.

So I'm not even completely sure how they can even call it salary. Like... Maybe I've misunderstood the meaning of that word my entire life?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (5 children)

I have a salaried position. I don't clock in. But it's typically only used to deny us overtime pay. If I work 35 hours a week, I'm paid 12.5% less than my colleagues who do 40. And if my lunch break is too long, I'm expected to stay late sometime within the month to compensate.

And while I do have a shit job (save me) I've never seen someone whose employer didn't mind their hours as long as they got shit done.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

You cannot be salaried and deducted hours you don't work.

Either you are hourly, and paid for the hours you actually work, or you're salaried, and paid regardless of how many hours you work.

What your employer is doing is illegal, and wage theft.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is so common in Quebec that I have trouble believing it's illegal. I think it might be a loophole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 34 minutes ago

How do they know when you're not working your full 40 if you aren't clocking in or out? I'm not familiar with Canadian labor law so you may very well be right, but it is kind of hard to imagine a legal pay structure where they can dock you for working fewer hours but don't compensate you for working more.

Friendly reminder that wage theft is very common and just because lots of people are breaking the law doesn't mean it's actually legal. For example in the States, there is a fairly narrow definition of which jobs qualify as overtime exempt but go to a jobs board and you'll find pretty much anything under the sun. Many employees are incorrectly classified as exempt and are completely unaware they are even entitled to overtime pay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You cannot be salaried and deducted hours you don't work.

You would think that. And yet, the US... Finds a way. I'd rather not doxx myself by getting into it further, but it's definitely not illegal where I am.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

You're not an exempt (salaried) employee if they deduct your pay for working less in a given week. I've never had an employer who cared about hours as long as work got done.

[–] Vendetta9076 4 points 9 hours ago

Mine doesn't give a fuck how long we work.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

As others have said, I'm in the "put time in, get shit done" camp.

Provided I deliver a job well done, my bosses don't give a fuck what or how many hours I clock per week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

I guess it depends on the company. Mine clearly expects us to work on 37.5 hours per week whether you work non stop from 9 to 4.30 or from 7 to 7 with many long breaks. And any overtime I do during the week makes my day at work on Friday that much shorter.

[–] [email protected] 182 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Everything changed. You're not crazy. If you watch movies made before the 2000s about office culture, including the movie 9 to 5, you can see that the hours included a lunch break. Which was paid.

Yes, those of the older generation had it easier in every way.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

Is this a US thing? Do you not get paid for your lunch hour? That's wild.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Same in Germany, I think this common in many countries, no?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Where do you get paid for your lunch hour? I'm in Germany and while work life balance is certainly a thing here, more so than in the US, a paid lunch break is something I have never heard about.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 15 hours ago

Most people don't. So, for an average employee, it would be 9-530 to account for their unpaid 30m lunch required by law.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ha! Hour. You’re funny. Federal law only gives half an hour.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

Ha! Nah, Federal law doesn't require a lunch period, or breaks, at all. It's all state side.

Only thing is that if an employer gives a short break, like 5-20 mins, it must be paid and included in overtime.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

In the US, you're lucky if you get paid for the hours you work. And many don't get all of their hours paid.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] otp 15 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

I live in Canada. We get a half-hour lunch that isn't paid in my province.

Also, if you take more than 3 sick days a year, your boss can fire you. And the 3 sick days are unpaid. The government lowered the number from 10 to 3 shortly before the pandemic, and didn't raise it again! Oh, and to count, your boss can demand a doctor's note. Which cost money to the patient.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Damn, Canada is becoming less and less a viable escape plan from American fascism...

[–] otp 1 points 54 minutes ago

There might still be some decent provinces.

But yeah, I blame brain drain, cuts to the education system, and the influence of American culture! Haha

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Spaniard here. Not only does my company not pay me for lunch time. It also demands it to be at least 30 minutes long. How is it even legal to force my unpaid time to be a minimum amount?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's probably a law. Mandatory minimum breaks make perfect sense for factory workers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

They should be paid though

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Is the part about being able to socialize also a mythic fantasy? Where ever do people work that they find the time to have conversations?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Those old tv shows where they casually eat breakfast before work make more sense. They weren't up at 6, rushing to get to work by 8. They had a whole hour more.

[–] otp 15 points 13 hours ago

They also had someone to make it for them. One income was enough for the household.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

I am 51. When I started working my job was 9-5 with a one hour lunch an unofficial 30 minute coffee break and about four unofficial ten minute smoke breaks.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

Different jobs are different

Sorry for rambling

load more comments
view more: next ›