this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
192 points (92.5% liked)

News

23622 readers
3628 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20919616

Senior White House figures privately told Israel that the U.S. would support its decision to ramp up military pressure against Hezbollah — even as the Biden administration publicly urged the Israeli government in recent weeks to curtail its strikes, according to American and Israeli officials.

Not everyone in the administration was on board with Israel’s shift, despite support inside the White House, the officials said. The decision to focus on Hezbollah sparked division within the U.S. government, drawing opposition from people inside the Pentagon, State Department and intelligence community who believed Israel’s move against the Iran-backed militia could drag American forces into yet another Middle East conflict.

Officials in the intelligence community, in briefings and talks with members of Congress last week, had said they were increasingly worried about the potential for a direct ground confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah. Similar conversations were occurring in the State Department, where officials were concerned about the mounting civilian death toll in Lebanon.

The internal administration division seems to have dissipated somewhat in recent days, with top U.S. officials convening Monday at the White House with President Joe Biden to discuss the situation on the ground. Most agreed that the conflict, while fragile, could offer an opportunity to reduce Iran’s influence in Lebanon and the region.

Still, the White House is walking a fine line, U.S. and Israeli officials said. The Biden administration wants to support Israel’s actions against a U.S.-designated terrorist group that has killed Americans and threatens the region. But it is not comfortable endorsing Israel’s campaign completely — or publicly — because it is worried it will creep too far into Lebanese territory, instigating an all-out war, one of the U.S. officials said.

Archive link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago

This won't end well for anyone. What the fuck man.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I like Joe Biden in every other respect, but what the hell is up with this hard-on for Israel? Is it purely AIPAC and the Jewish-American vote, or is there some other calculus going into all this? I expected better, but they're just rubber-stamping anything and everything that Israel wants to do, no matter how fucked up.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

I think this is just the hill he's decided to die on. Zion uber alles or some ideological shit like that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Well, he is pretty old. Hammered in guilt and fervour for Israel due to being born during and growing up shortly after WWII?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

It wouldn't be the first time Israel engaged in compromat. Either that or he's completely blind to what's going on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have never supported Zionism and never will. However, I don't think most people truly understand how important Israel is to the US as a strategic ally. It's not some elaborate conspiracy, they're just a key aspect of US hegemony.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Can you elaborate on how and why Israel is such an important ally? It's got to be more than just a foothold in the region, surely?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In terms of weapons and cyber security israel is one of the top nations. Their weapons are 'battlefield tested' ( on innocent Palestinians), and their cybersecurity is pretty strong. In addition to that, they will always do what the US says, should the US abandon them they will immediately turn to another country to support them, now this country has top us technology.

Also they have nukes, so you must keep the country safe and stable. If Israel is invaded by the surrounding countries, suddenly Egypt has nukes, and will no longer need to rely so heavily on us support.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Illegal nukes, and technology developed with US money and in partnership with the US.

I guess your argument amounts to a sunk cost argument.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not really, nukes and military tech don't just disappear. I'm not for Israel, but there's a reason it's not as clear cut as people pretend it is

[–] Rekorse 2 points 2 months ago

That is the definition of the sunk cost fallacy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Because they oppose Iran. Same reason why we provided weapons to Iraq.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Israel offers no strategic advantage to the U.S. The U.S. has extensive military presence in the region without their land. The U.S. does not have a significant or unique trade relationship with Israel (we mostly just trade diamonds). And Israel offers no special capability to the U.S. regarding technology or foreign intelligence.

Our relationship with Israel is based on two things: mythology and political donations. That's it. That's all it has ever been. Conservatives (including neo-libs) who receive money from Israel occasionally make up fake reasons, but those reasons always disintegrate under the lightest scrutiny.

It's time to end our extremely one-sided relationship with Israel. This is a deadly, toxic relationship that destabilizes our more profitable relationships with Israel's neighbors in the middle east.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dude's a Christian Zionist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Dude's a Christian Zionist.

I actually doubt that. Zionism is usually an Evangelical Protestant trait, this notion that we need to force prophecy to be true isn’t associated with Catholicism.

I realize that from the outside all flavors of any given religion look pretty similar, but there is a stark difference between your average Catholic and your average Evangelical. And between various flavors of Protestantism, some of which are far more similar to Catholicism than they are to the more “Evangelical” Southern Baptists, Pentecostals, or non-denominational megachurches.

Point is, I would be shocked to find that Zionism is a religious belief for J’Biden. It’s far more likely that his position regarding Israel is more rooted in realpolitik support for one’s allies at any cost, which is also reprehensible.

[–] spyd3r 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Israel is the closest thing to a modern democracy with progressive western style values in the entire region. Israel has a multitude of diverse cultures and ethnicities integrated into its society, and has a vastly better stance on equal rights for women, lgbt, and ethnic minorities, than any of its neighbors.

Probably also has something to do with all of the other countries in the area being client states of Russia/Iran/China.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Fun fact. It is illegal in most cases to marry outside your culture in Israel. Basically illegal to race mix, though more complicated than that. Also Israel does not recognize gay marriage. I don't care if Lebanon has worse rules. We don't call an apartheid state valid for being at 1900 Jim Crow standards .

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Perhaps they should have left Western style Manifest Destiny in the past.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Calling Israel aligned with Western values is a pretty big self own

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They said it's the closest in the region.

Which of its neighbors is more closely aligned with Western values?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No it's accurate: apartheid settler colonial state genociding the native population and bringing war to the middle east.

Not something to flex about though on either side.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You name your favorite country, and I'll tell you why they shouldn't flex either.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Oh ok nvm then carry on Israel

[–] Rekorse 1 points 2 months ago

Everyone makes mistakes, all mistakes are fine!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Most agreed that the conflict, while fragile, could offer an opportunity to reduce Iran’s influence in Lebanon and the region.

Iran influence is based on "Israel" actions. No Genocide, No aggression, means no one would need Iran. The same in Iraq and other regions. Which makes me question the statement unless these people are really stupid.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Shades of "if we just keep indiscriminately bombing in the vicinity of where we think terrorists are, we'll certainly reduce the influence of terrorist organizations among the populace".

Surely it's worth a nearly infinite number of (Arab) lives and residential buildings to kill one Hezbollah leader. After all, they're super-terrorist masterminds without which no one could think of setting off a bomb or firing unguided rockets into Israel.

[–] prole 3 points 2 months ago

Not to mention that this is exactly how you create more terrorists (and Bibi knows this)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, is there a way to find out how many Americans have been killed by Hezbollah and hamas vs Israel?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

All of those numbers are teeny tiny in comparison to the number of Americans killed by America.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Are you denying Israel has the right to start World War III due to its half century of barbaric apartheid occupation and abuse of the Palestinian people?

Annihilating your neighbors because they refuse to bow down to your genocidal regime is self defense!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

fuck genocde-joe and may he burn eternally in hell

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

They did not quietly support it, when you learn to look for their actions instead of their words.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

That land is owed to Israel, it’s not an invasion and you’re an antisemite, or whatever Reddit said

load more comments
view more: next ›