People will look back on this era and say, "just because they could have doesn't mean they should have."
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
389 points (95.8% liked)
News
22839 readers
3812 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This feels like a backlash to the insane length of copyright terms.
I suppose, but it feels more like a cheap cash grab to me.
If the game or the movie are anything more than mediocre, I'll reconsider.
Oh, it's undoubtedly that too. But if these characters had entered public domain decades ago like they should have, something similar would have been done and the novelty of beloved characters doing "shocking" things would have worn off.
Maybe backlash is the wrong word, but their own damn fault at least.
It's definitely Disney's fault. The original reason they convinced Sonny Bono to extend the copyright act was because it was the home video era and it meant anyone could start selling VHS tapes with Steamboat Willie on them. Now that era is over, so Disney cares a lot less.
Look at their acquisitions since the last time they lobbied for an extension...They own Star Wars, Marvel, and Hulu now. They don't care (about extending the copyright) this time because Steamboat Willie ain't shit to them (in terms of income) anymore. Mickey Mouse might as well just be the logo for Disneyland/world at this point
Edit: added stuff in parenthesis to clarify what I'm saying
But the landscape has also changed. If people were still buying physical media in large numbers or significantly buying digital media rather than relying on streaming services, Disney would have more money in the game to lose. But no one stands to make money from just trying to sell Steamboat Willie as-is.
Also, Disney is vicious about defending their trademarks. I think they care about Mickey a hell of a lot more than you think and they will be watching very closely for anything that steps out of line into trademark violation territory regarding Steamboat Willie.
To clarify, I meant that don't care about fighting to extend the copyright. I see how my wording implies they don't care about Steamboat Willie so I'll edit my comment
they will be watching very closely for anything that steps out of line into trademark violation territory regarding Steamboat Willie.
Definitely agree with you here
Ok, I get you now. I think both your and my factors probably play a part. I'm just glad there's no major corporation out there left trying to extend copyright law even longer than the ridiculous 70 years after the author's death that it is now.
For much of the 20th century, copyright in the U.S. was 19 years with an option to extend for another 19 when that expired. And it should have stayed that way.
Disney really fucked with our laws. Megacorps are a bane on society
The game has a Nazi name, Nazi community moderators, a theme about killing vermin, a large right wing following online…
When you say your bar isn’t a Nazi bar but Nazis just keep showing up and hanging around, guess what you have.
Lovely.
This is the exact template for Blood and Honey, really. Put all $10 of your budget into the Public Domain sweetie, pay everyone else with exposure.
Laugh at the shitty but honest reviews all the way to the bank.
I don't mind a good example being made of this. The original creator(s) are long dead and gone. All the current copyright laws do are prevent innovation and protect money flow of large corporations in my opinion. Is was originally so individuals who came up with new great ideas could reap the rewards of that idea. No longer is that the case.
"The Copyright Act of 1790 was the first statute in the United States to identify definite provisions of copyright law and permitted authors the right to their intellectual property for a duration of 14 years. Today, depending on the type of work, copyright terms can reach up to 120 years. Historically, Disney has been exceedingly protective of their intellectual property and is a prominent supporter and lobbyist for copyright term extension (Bernaski, 2014). Disney's involvement in copyright term extension originates from their goal to prevent their copyrights from entering the public domain, specifically their Mickey Mouse character."
I say make a good example of them. The creator should benifit from their creations, but ideas should not be stifled for generations to accomplish that.
Disclaimer: I have not read my source, shame on me if it is counter to my opinion. But corporations are not people, I don't care what the SC says.
Oh I don't disagree. I think the standard for most of the 20th century- 19 years with an option to renew for another 19, made a lot more sense. I just don't praise these companies seeing dollar signs because they can capitalize off of a popular work becoming public domain almost the minute it enters the public domain either.
I agree fundamentally, but I think, especially with AI faking stuff, we need to get back to people just writing things off as shitty ripoffs and ignoring them. Take away the novelty of it and it'll go away. Disney made this particular bed. Now they gotta lay in it.
I for some reason have enough faith in humanity that once we how dumb this all plays out some realistic rules can be put in place.
I don't think we are in disagreement here at all. We're talking about two different things. You're talking about Disney rightfully getting hurt by this and I'm talking about the people who are going to be using this potentially amazing opportunity in what is likely to be an extremely lazy way like that Winnie the Pooh slasher film.
Just because Disney could lobby to make copyright law insanely long doesn't mean they should have. It wouldn't have been s big event if Disney didn't make it one.
load more comments
(1 replies)
This looks awful, like that Pooh movie. This "make a horror story out of expired copyrights" trend is gonna get old, fast.
I heard the Pooh movie was good. Then I watched it. I probably won't bother with this Mickey movie.
bother
heh
load more comments
(1 replies)
So is this just going to happen with every single character that goes into public domain? Someone just has to make a garbage horror movie about them?
Yeah.
Just like how people are more likely to want to stay standing up after having to sit for 8 hours for work/school.
There's a social rubberbanding effect, just gotta get it out of our collective system so the tension is released, and then better content will come after that release.
If it's the character thats the face of the organization that is the reason copyright law has been strengthened and enforced with iron rulings, then yes it damn well should happen. Disney is simply reaping what they sewed and they earend every last bit of it and more.
Did you expect anything less?
Fuck Disney, Fuck Copyright laws and all of that, but there has got to be something more interesting to do with Mickey than a schlocky horror movie with a budget of two paper clips and a pack of gum
Yes. But those things take time and don't farm clicks.
Yeah they did this with Winnie the Pooh and afaik it wasn't great. I get the idea, but lacks creativity if "it's just opposite" is your draw card.
It was apparently profitable enough they are making a sequel
I watched it. I was actually kind of excited. I enjoy cheesy horror movies. Including ones that know what they are. Movies like Skinamarink are amazing works of art, and i love it, but Llamageddon was a movie to watch with friends, have a few beers and a frozen pizza.
But I feel like when people make these movies, it's a really fine line to walk, where it can easily just become bad. The Winnie the Pooh one unfortunate just missed the mark. It was just bad. Not the worst, but I don't see myself watching it again.
load more comments
(2 replies)
If they really want to make a good movie with some decisive social commentary it should be about mickey enslaved by a "nameless" corporation (because of course everything else is copyrighted and trademarked still) and escaping. Would make an interesting thriller, there's a lot that could be done to criticize copyright and the companies that abuse the system and their labor force.
Someone make this please, the idea is free (and so is the character)
It's so edgy. At first you're like "Hey that's Mickey Mouse! I know him!" And then he's doing horrible things and you're like "wait a minute - Mickey Mouse wouldn't kill people!"
That's what makes it artistic.
Really subverted my expectations
Waiting for a Mickey V Winnie movie
Note that Mickey Mouse himself is most definitely trademarked and protected via IP laws. The mouse himself may still also be copyrighted (I haven’t bothered to look)
Creating derivative works is still most certainly illegal.
tl;dr you can freely share Steamboat Willie, but you should not try to create your own Mickey Mouse shows since Disney has no issue bankrupting you in a copyright/trademark lawsuit.
That being said, bring on the nightmare mouse!
What's the difference between mickey mouse and "the mouse himself" the way you used it?
load more comments
(2 replies)
i was expecting some rival studio to have an AI ready to just blast out new mickey episodes hourly.
Hahaha this is what I was waiting for after the copyright ended
view more: next ›