this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
527 points (95.4% liked)

News

22595 readers
4147 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 87 points 11 months ago (7 children)

In order to use a defibrillator, you have to remove everything from a person's chest. This includes the bra and to even shave chest hair to be able to apply the pads correctly.

I've always thought that it would be troublesome for a man to have to apply a defibrillator to a woman if someone assumes foul play because of their own issues.

Life over dignity in that situation, everyone else be damned.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

If I saw someone with a defibrillator ripping the clothes off an unconscious woman, I don't think I would suspect foul play.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You might not, but you gotta remember that the public is also filled with idiots

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

While my cousin's neighbor is fighting a law suit because, a woman (cousin's neighbor) used defibrillator on another woman(when her heart stopped) , and other woman is now suing the neighbor for some minor marks from defibrillator. Mostly neighbor will win the case, but she has to appear in court now. Makes me feel so angry and i don't even know the neighbor lady.

[–] funkless_eck 38 points 11 months ago (2 children)

in these cases sometimes the insurance makes you sue even if you don't want to because otherwise they won't pay for any of the debt

My colleague has a situation where he's being sued by his neighbor for minor burns after a firework accident a few years ago 4th of July. The neighbor doesn't want to sue him but has no choice to get the medical services paid for.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] captain_aggravated 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if judges could be persuaded to levy punitive damages against the insurance company for this kind of thing. "Your honor, we're only wasting your time with this because the insurance company is making us sue. Could you confiscate a few hundred million dollars from them for this worthless harassment?"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

At least in America, all the judges are either in the pocket of the businesses or have their hands tied by laws passed by legislators who are in the pocket of businesses. Fuck them businesses.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

The ultimate goal with insurance companies is to have you give them money and they never have to give you anything in return. If they can get you to sue the other person, the insurance company doesn't have to pay. To them it's a win-win.

Weakly regulated insurance is a scam

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

And you have to remember that there's a difference between what some random idiot on the street thinks and what someone can actually be prosecuted for.

Jesus Christ, do the fucking CPR

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Surely there are good Samaritan laws even in the US?

[–] Patches 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The court of public opinion, and cancel culture, do not care about good Samaritan laws.

News that destroys reputations can spread faster and further than the truth. Most people still think the McDonalds coffee lady is a gold digger after 20 years of corrections.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are, but remember that defenses come into play after being sued. So you can still go through the mental nightmare (because let's be real, a rich person isn't going to be doing CPR, and certainly isn't going to care about being sued, so only your typical person who could lose everything in this scenario) of being a defendant in a lawsuit until the judge agrees to toss it or you go to court and are found not liable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

The public scrutiny and the mark on your record does not go away even if you're found not liable. Once you are even accused of anything like this, it's there forever. People will think you got off on a "technicality".

If you're a man facing this, your life is ruined. May as well move away and never come back.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

It's not just about being prosecuted, but publicly judged and shamed for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Never said I wouldn't do the CPR. Only pointing out that in an emergency situation that people are fucking stupid and that a random idiot could easily interfere violently with what they think might be sexual assault

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Which is why all the most clever rapists carry defibs.

If you EVER see a man carrying a defibrillator, 9 of 10 times, he's a rapist.

What's worse, the extra super clever ones, ride around in ambulances with disguises to make them look like paramedics.

Whenever I see a rapist mobile with flashing lights, I run them off the road.

I've saved at least a dozen women already this year.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

To be fair there are rapist mobiles and they do have flashing lights, they just don't say "Ambulance" on them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I could imagine someone thinking "wow he took her bra off, that was unnecessary". Since correct defib use isn't really common knowledge

[–] [email protected] 43 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine dying because some old puritan assholes decided at some point that female nips are inherently offensive but male nips are fine. Humanity can be so idiotic sometimes

[–] Jax 28 points 11 months ago

Yeah that wouldn't be what prevents a man from giving a woman CPR. It would be the potential for someone to cry foul play.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

No, they decided both were bad. It wasn't until 1935 that male nips were legal to open-carry

[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It does not have to be life over dignity. There can be a middle ground they could at least provide a cover while doing their thing. I know a teen girl who changed school, did therapy and tried to sue because she once had a seizure and they stripped her naked in front everyone to save her. Her "friends" took video of her and spread it all over their school. As awful as it sounds I'm not making this up.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago

Fuck the other kids for taking and sharing videos, people suck.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yup, and that's exactly why men don't help. They tried to save her, but got sued. It's really not worth it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I'd expect the people who shared footage to be sued, not the first responders.

[–] Angry_Maple 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why does almost no one clear the area in these posted experiences? That was covered in my (very) basic first aid training. It was emphasized, and it came with a heavy reminder that patient care should be a very high priority. I'm honestly just suprised to read all of these.

Y'all need better trainers and better Good Samaritan laws to protect you. What a world where someone just dies when they could have been saved by someone who was already nearby. Society sucks. Neither "angle" is great.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yup, society sucks. It's probably selfish of me, but I ain't saving someone when it's possible that I get accused of SA. It's just not worth it. The hassle and the possiblilty of being labelled could affect my future and jobs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] clay_pidgin 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I just did red cross CPR and AED training last week, and the materials said the clothes all need to come off (or pulled up or whatever - off the chest) but chest hair doesn't need to be shaved. Presumably the instructions change periodically.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Its probably much better to have a shaved chest, but lets be realistic. In a situation where CPR and an AED are being used, 1. you probably arent going to have a razor handy 2. the sub-optimal contact with the skin is the least of you (or the patient's) worries.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I took a course a couple of years agao and I believe they said the AEDs come with a razor

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can confirm. Almost all defibrillators come with a pack of additional supplies - including a dry razor

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

They also teach now to use the provided additional set of pads to basically wax the chest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

It's only an issue on very hairy chests -- i.e. full "bearskin rug" where you need to place the pads. There are patients that have so much hair the pads aren't even touching skin.

In which case you absolutely need to remove the hair. A slightly delayed initial defibrillation is better than multiple ineffective ones. Most AED kits should have a spare set of pads ("wax the chest" with the first set) or a disposable razor.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're not going to take time to shave, every second counts. The solution is the extra adhesive pads most every AED has. You plant one of those on the the chest hair and rip, and you can get an effectively hairless spot for your lead.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Dry shaving a hairy spot takes like 5 seconds. We're not talking about whipping out a hot towel and a straight razor.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

The instructions say that chest hair comes off if the pad isn't sticking effectively to the chest. That means shaving if you have a razor, or using the second adhesives (kid/adult sizes usually come in the same AED kit) as ad hoc waxing devices.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Nah, some random persons life is not worth my freedom.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why you think your freedom would be in jeopardy for providing CPR

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because you could get accused of SA.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And that random person may someday be your daughter, and the bystanders some other men who agree with you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Doubtful. I recognize the world is a shitty place so I had a surgery to prevent me from bringing more people into it.

To be clear, because somehow this was lost in translation, I wish it was as cut and dry as giving CPR to someone who needs it. But the world, again, is a shitty place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Sounds like a problem for women with chest hair.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

you dont have to shave chest hair, wtf are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to, but some defibrillator kits include a razor, and when I took a CPR class, we were taught how to remove hair using either a razor or an extra set of defib pads.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

That’s for excessive hair. Just make sure you both aren’t in a puddle.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They're constantly updating best practices, the kits come with a little razor now. Though we got told to apply the pad on the hair and then pull it off, effectively waxing the area. It's apparently to get better contact. Personally I think shaving would be more effective, suppose you do what you have to in the situation.

[–] Mouselemming 3 points 11 months ago

Waxing would be faster and if there's still hair you could shave it. More painful of course but if it wakes them up you can stop there.