this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
873 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18973 readers
2966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 251 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is literally explicitly legalized fascism and its the law of the land right now. Even if Biden wins he needs to do something to stop this before he leaves office or the US will forever be exactly as fascist as the President decides he wants to be. It's here now.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

There’s not much he can do short of committing a crime himself. Democrats don’t have control of the House, so there no way to increase the size of SCOTUS. They were smart in ruling bribery is legal before granting immunity, or Biden would have been able to officially order the DOJ to investigate SCOTUS for corruption.

His hands are tied unless he wants to get blood on them.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

Blood on his hands from BLM protesters, Palestinians, trans people, Ukrainians who could use the support more than Israel, most Americans who don't have enough to live with life threatening illnesses, Mexicans at the border, ignoring COVID...

Fuck the Court. It doesn't care about America. The penalty for teason is...?

If you or I did anything close to what Trump and the Courts did and do on a daily basis we'd be arrested in a high security prison. Jan 6th had next to no punishment for any of the leaders.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

It's literally not a crime if the president does it.

There's lots he can do besides killing people if you are creative.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Its time to get blood on them

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He can pack the supreme court. Then limit it to something tangible.

Like first, say that 2 senators per state is silly and it needs to be based on population like the house if reps. Then say that we need a supreme court justice from all 50 states + D.C. or some shit.

Boom.

Then term limits, age limits... Ranked choice, strict laws in gerrymandering...

And we have a functioning Republic again.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

None of that is in within the power of POTUS.

The structure of Congress is determined by The Constitution and its Amendments.

Congress needs to pass enlarging the Supreme Court with a vote, and Republicans have House majority.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

There are so many misinformed people on this ruling. It doesn’t give the President more executive authority, like a king. It lets him commit crime without personal responsibility if it’s an official act.

Yes, it’s insane and deplorable, but it doesn’t mean Biden can do anything he wants.

If it did, he could just outlaw felons from becoming President. SCOTUS doesn’t want that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If it did, he could just outlaw felons from becoming President. SCOTUS doesn’t want that.

"I have ordered the military to detain Donald Trump in a Federal max security prison and destroy all ballots marked with his name on election day. This is not a change in the laws of our great nation, this is just an act that I am ordering to be performed in my official capacity as POTUS. God bless America."

[–] freeman 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And while he won't face any charges himself the military will refuse to execute what is an obviously unlawful order.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's all about asking the right people.

[–] freeman 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If making up imaginary scenarios in your mind that have no chance of happening makes you feel better go for it my man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

lmao, I mean, I don't think it has any real chance of happening. But what stops it is Biden being Biden. If it were, say, a fascist in the Oval Office, the only question would be "Who do I ask to do this dirty work?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Well, presidents can also leverage other actors to help them out. Quid pro quo, you might say.

Unfortunately that really only tends to work in the favor of bad actors. There is no legitimate reason to have immunity for "good."

[–] ryathal 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It really doesn't change much. Instead of just ignoring what presidents do that might be criminal, it's explicitly immune.

Also this ruling doesn't grant further immunity to others. The president can order seal team 6 to kill someone, but they'd still face charges if it wasn't plausibly a legitimate target.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Good point, and well made. The immunity is explicitly for POTUS. If those carrying out the act are aware they are committing a crime they could be charged accordingly.

It unfortunately may change a lot for Trump, depending on what judges rule to be “official acts” of his Presidency. Cannon may use this to throw out the documents case.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except the President has pardon power.

Soooo, henchmen also have absolute immunity if the president is fully aware that what he has ordered is illegal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That’s a good and terrifying point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Biden could also grant immunity to others in carrying out his potential illegal actions, like trump did. If you want to fanfiction this scenario

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cannon may use this to throw out the documents case.

How? The documents case is about stuff he did after he left office. Things he does after he is no longer President definitionally cannot be official acts of his Presidency.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

There is no duration limit to the immunity ruling. If she deems the ownership of documents an official act, she could rule that immunity covers all acts related to the documents until their return.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you mean. Even if he believed he had the right to retain the documents, he wasn't willfully improperly keeping the documents or obstructing their retrieval until after he was out of office - you'd basically just have to not charge him regarding any documents he handed over the first time, because after the first time handing over documents he definitely knew better and definitely wasn't in office.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Oh, I agree that it should be considered a crime. I’m just suggesting a way Cannon may leverage this in Trumps favor.

Since there’s no requirement that the President needs to be actively in office for immunity, if she ruled that his ownership of the documents was an “official act,” then any crime he may have committed involving the documents could be considered in service of said act.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

That's the funny thing. He cant commit crimes anymore. He's immune from the law. All he needs to do is order the military to destroy the corruption in the Supreme Court using the legal doctrine known as bullets in the brainpan. Poof, problem solved. You don't even have to kill people, just a few fascists.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Arrest the freedom Caucus and pass legislation to fix this before they can be replaced.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

To be fair. He just has to kill off the maga leadership. MAGAs are weak-minded followers, they will throw their impotent tantrums, then get distracted. The non-magas in the regressive party (gop) will cower then do their usual thing, hell most of them will instantly turn on maga when it has no teeth anymore. When he stops there, and normal Regressives don't get persecuted or attacked, and the US starts getting better, they will all carry on...and McConnel, who will still somehow be alive, will say it was all his idea.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 4 points 3 months ago

Frankly? He needs to get on with that malicious compliance to graphically - and yes, in some cases violently - demonstrate why this is a terrible fucking idea. I’m genuinely not looking forward to it, but at the same time I do think it’s become absolutely necessary.

But I sincerely doubt he will.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

His hands are tied unless voters give him a mandate by voting all MAGAs out of office.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Kill Trump, kill scouts. Problem solved.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Hey, the Boy Scouts are getting better, no need to kill them!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Sorry dude. Order's in from Flavortown. Scouts gotta watch their backs

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"America - love it or leave it!"

"OK."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

They love the founders and want to create a nation for their religion....so...they should go do that...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Last match our scout died to medic 5 times, there is no salvaging this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Medics just do that sometimes, it's the power of mad science

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

in all honesty, that's what you Americans need to do. the days of peaceful protests and marching are behind you, you missed that boat a while ago. now a ship named "Revolution" has just pulled into dock and if you're not on that boat then there's no more boats coming.

Stop using the excuse of "but I need to work, I have to pay rent, I have to pay bills" because in 4 months time you might not have a job to pay those bills or rent. hell depending on if you're a woman, LGBTQ+, liberal, black, an immigrant, etc, etc, etc you might have none of the above.

The American people and the country as a whole are literally, currently, right now in real time dying by a thousand cuts. you're being slowly and methodically murdered with precision and too many of you don't realize you're dying. Time to demand heads on pikes and if they aren't handed to you, well you need to go out and get them.

One way or another people are going to die. I mean I'm not going to sugar coat this, people will die.

So the question is would you rather die laying on your back doing nothing or would you rather die saving whats left of your nation and fighting for your fellow American?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Easier said than done. How could this bloody revolution ever come out in the people's favor when the US government controls the most powerful military in the world? I want to know how everyone spouting off about taking power back by force realistically thinks it will play out.