freeman

There were no horses in America, there were evolutionary ancestors of horses that would not be able to fulfill any horse role.

Just like zebras are not horses and wolves not dogs. They would obviously not be owned by Native Americans nor would the Native Americans have a remarkable body of knowledge about them (like they developed with actual horses).

Horses were bred to be big and strong enough in Central Asia.

It's not fear it's hatred and a boost to their ego.

A Russian defeat would again deprive NATO of purpose.

Doubt it. He ranks low on the color chart.

They need to ban them from forking the browser. Google has the ability to get people to install the new Google totally-not-chrome browser. Especially if they keep Android as well.

The EU should mandate support for its native alphabets (probably via Unicode) for IT service providers that provide services in the EU.

ΑΒΕΖΗΙΚΜΝΟΡΤΥΧ

Part of the capital Greek alphabet.

You can't read can you?

I did not deny that I question your atheism. I clarified that it is not due to you reading the bible but due to your defence of Christianity.

I am not doubting that you are an atheist because you 've read the bible (after all I wrote in my last post that I 've also read it) but because of your Christianity apologia.

As usual you answering a strawman and not me.

Rofl. I suggest your realize that even the Protestants don't actually care about what the Bible says, despite it being the basis of their attack on the Catholic Church (whose origins alongside the Orthodox predate the Bible and have consistently been against a Bible only interpretation of Christianity). In practice Christian churches have been railing against queer people since forever.

Thus it is you who should look at the history of Christianity in the last 2000 millennia and not just the read the Bible.

I 've read the fucking bible, it's morally reprehensible and indefensible if you have a shred of decency. It's understandable since it was written by people with completely different morals to us with an agenda to push.

Trump's base, his defense secretary, identify (strongly) as Christians, most people consider them Christians. A no true Scotman objection by you is meaningless pedantry. Even if we deny them the title of Christian they are still more dangerous than Gabbard's little and more mainstream. Actually them being more mainstream is the reason they are more dangerous than Gabbard's cult.

Are you really an atheist? If you are a Christian remember lying is a sin!

The left?

Believe it or not, I care about people other than my daughter and I don’t buy the “everything is at one level of bad and it can’t get better or worse” argument you seem to be making.

So more dishonesty and strawmen. Forget your daughter; Would your suggestion to queer people be different if Gabbard was not part of the Trump administration ? Flee if Gabbard is in, don't if it's just the good Christians?

The fact that you are apparently not aware that people convert to Christianity, including queer people, does not speak well of you.

So Fuck you it is.

Christianity's message still condemns queer people as sinners. I suppose part of the people who convert to Christianity also believe that.