this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
163 points (91.0% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3857 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 101 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Hey wait I like a president who apologizes when he gets something wrong.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago (4 children)

What's the alternative? Fix it with a sharpie?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that obviously worked, not sure why they don't sharpie out all hurricanes going forward. /S

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Glad you clarified on the sarcasm there dude, there are too many people out there nowadays who think pens are the answer to bad weather.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

That’s Classified. As was any statement made about said subject, also classified.

[–] Mouselemming 4 points 8 months ago

~~Fix~~Fake it with a Sharpie

[–] lurch 4 points 8 months ago

The alternatives are gaslighting and doubling down and distraction and lies etc.. You know, what Trump would do.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe someday we could get a public apology instead of a private one.

There's a difference between saying it to the nation from a podium and behind closed doors to a couple politicians whose support you desperately need...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Exactly.

This is a clear attempt by the Democrats to win back the Muslim and Arab vote.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's so odd to have a president who is secure enough and has the humility to admit fault.

Even today, Trump is claiming he intentionally mixes up Obama and Biden in speeches.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

"Hey man. I knew what I was saying. I just wanted to see if you knew."

[–] [email protected] 60 points 9 months ago

Honestly, seeing/hearing the words "I will do better" from a President is what real leadership actually looks like. It's sad that it's borderline inspiring, but in this climate, it's at least an attempt at statesmanship.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The National Desk

Not worth the photons to display it. This is just the Sinclair Propaganda Group's spin on the Washington Post's reporting. Read that instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Using reader mode on iOS just gives an eBay page with some odd file. It’s junk website site even if you subscribe to their spin.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

Now that is how a president should behave. Humble and accepting of criticism when they’re wrong.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This article is a month old

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

TIL: Mon, November 27th 2023, 11:09 AM EST is a month old.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The article in the Washington post that it pulls all its information from is (Oct 25). So why dredge it back up?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That’s a question for Jackson Walker who wrote the article. My guess, to repair his poll numbers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

So what? His admin has helped facilitate at least a temporary ceasefire to get humanitarian aid in, allow civilians to escape, and to address hostage release since then. Sounds like he's "doing better."

https://apnews.com/article/israel-war-hamas-american-hostages-biden-5d55c5e0d8ff0eced2e3ea46a4a14e69

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They hand picked 5 people to attend a discussion about Palestinians and only one of them was actually Palestinian.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why would they send more, and why do you think those four people representing a different nation, as members of that nation, didn't need to hear the discussion?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm confused.

Is your argument that Palestinian rights are a Muslim rights issue?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My argument is that it's pretty common to send organizational members to discussions, conventions, and meetings to learn things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This was a meeting with Joe Biden. I would argue he'd have a few things to learn on this matter.

My argument about not including Palestinian voices is that you're ignoring the people most impacted there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Will he do better about continuing to fund and supply the genocide?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

The cookies setting on that site are terrible! Some of the vendors can't recieve cookie request settings over Https so some of your requested settings did not go through..

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Has he apologized for his blatant lie about seeing beheaded babies?

He's gonna do better by removing all restrictions of weapon sales to Israel so they can finish off their genocide and ethnic cleansing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sales? Lol.

The US has "Strategic reserves" of ammunition, weapons, and vehicles in Israel. These are held there in case of a regional conflict the US has to respond to.

Biden is in the process of allowing Israel to access these reserves without limitation, instead of following US and international law about supplying arms. Our tax dollars will now be used to refill these strategic reserves after Israel "accesses" them.

Oh and I'm sure as soon as this blows over we will be fast on our feet to reverse that decision and won't build Israel's arsenal for a decade or more. Nope definitely won't do that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think it's important to note that modern supplies have a timeline on them and from what I understand we've provided both isreal and ukraine with supplies on the cusp of or already expired to which we would have had to replace them anyway.

You may not like it, and I don't agree with it, but they are technically saving the taxpayer money because if they didn't do this the items would be taken to a UEX ranch and blown up, costing significantly more for the taxpayer in transport and work than just selling it to the locals and replacing the stock with new.

As a direct point to this, the russians bought north korean artillery shells* and they are killing more russians and their equipment than actually firing towards targets.

*Many of the shells that russia bought from north korea are actually the shells the USSR sold NK before they collapsed. Explosive ordinance and munitions tend to require controlled environments for long term storage or they have an expected low lifetime viability. (especially if affected by humid conditions)