this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
688 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31714 readers
4595 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 144 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I mean... if we reeeaaally wanna carbon date ourselves...

[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The whole man is insufficient Data, I love Data so much 🥹

[–] drasglaf 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

That smirk is what makes it

[–] darkdemize 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

All that's missing is the modem ear rape.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unironically I love that so much lol

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

On the off chance you haven't experienced the Floppotron:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oym7B7YidKs

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

I fuckin love the floppotron! 🥰

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

There were reports of teenage boys becoming so conditioned that they would get an erection when they heard a modem dialling

The internet has always been about porn

The first ever image digitally transmitted was a playboy centrefold. "The Lena"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember when it went down by half an inch a second. Those were the times

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And websites would have a link to a page and say "Warning! This page contains a lot of pictures!" so you wouldn't click it unless you were prepared to put your other browsing on hold for a little while

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I was grabbing some files originally made for some old DOS software a few years ago and the site had a warning for the 20MB text file download. Like, my good friend that's just the front page of CNN these days! Thank you for your concern but now it just seems quaint rather than thoughtful

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Didn't GIFs load from the bottom?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

No. You're thinking of jifs

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

pngcrush gets it down to 21.1 kB with no loss of quality.
I tried posting the file, but Lemmy converts it to the atrocious webp format automatically.
EDIT: JPEG-XL clocks in at just 16.3 kB, again with no loss of quality.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the atrocious webp format

I continue to be confused by the level of widespread hate WebP still gets. It's old enough to be widely (albeit not universally) supported in software like web browsers, but new enough to provide similar-or-better (usually better) lossless compression than PNG (21,578 bytes for the original image) and typically better lossy compression than JPEG at comparable perceived quality, especially for the types of images typically shared on the internet (rather than say, images saved directly from a DLSR camera). It's why servers bother to re-encode JPEG images to WebP for delivery - they wouldn't bother wasting the compute time to re-compress if it wasn't generally worth doing.

I can understand it if we were, say, 10-15 years ago when the format was still not super widely supported yet, but that's basically where we are with JPEG XL and AVIF support right now too. If one of these two had exactly the level of support that WebP does right now then yes, of course we should probably use one of them instead - but we're not there yet. Until we are, WebP often has the best compromise between compatibility and compression efficiency as far as image formats go, and that's why a lot of sites do this re-compression thing using WebP. I gave some examples using digital art (one of the things I was compressing a lot at the time) a year ago in a related discussion: https://lemmy.world/post/6665251/4462007

A news website local to me recently-ish started choosing to deliver AVIF-compressed (or probably re-compressed) images the same way a lot of sites currently do it for WebP because my browser supports AVIF, so at least we are starting to see a token amount of uptake on the next-gen formats in the wild.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm a dev and webp is incredible. Don't really understand the hate - it's a libre format that is lighyears ahead of png or jpg in every measurable metric. The lack of support is entirely on app developers and their incompetence not the format.

The other formats like jpeg xl are only catching up now when webp was out for 14 years already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone should use jxl for their photos

[–] WhyJiffie 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

JXL for the win! when will we get support for it in firefox though..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This JPEG is just 41 KiB, which was the style shortly after I was born.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Excuse me, I forgot the text. Wouldn't be fair without all that entropy. To make up for it, I turned on chroma subsampling. This one is 39 KiB.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

To be more accurate, the dithering was more specific to animated gifs and not static pictures. Unless you go back really far... I remember finding porn on 5 inch floppies my dad had in his closet and even the non-animated images were black & white and dithered to hell. Though I am pretty sure he didn't obtain those off the internet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Dithered Street Fighter porn?

[–] einfach_orangensaft 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

how small can u get this with the text still readable?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Depends on what you consider readable, but I got it down to 2842 bytes by downscaling it and using an absolutely atrocious quality setting:

Image

That's just small enough to fit inside a QR code, so I did that! (You probably can't scan it with a typical QR reader; you need something like zbar that supports reading binary data).

[–] einfach_orangensaft 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

nice :D

in a different timeline where the GIF89 specification would not have been mostly ignored, it would have been possible to go even smaller.

"The GIF89 specification allows you to specify text captions to be overlayed on the following image. This feature never took off; browsers and image-processing applications such as Photoshop ignore it"

Meaning if your gif viewing client supports full GIF89 then you could just display the text over a 1x1 pixel image, shrinking the file size down to something in the range of < 100bytes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I turned on chroma subsampling

A simplified polygonal scene, originally from Futurama scene that's styled like anime. Fry is saying "You and I are enemies now." while pointing at a jpegified Professor Farnsworth. Meta note: The scene was made in the Godot game engine.

43KiB, though obviously a chunk of that is from the colors of the jpg Professor.

EDIT: I just noticed webp messes with colors around the edges too (which would matter more if I cut the resolution in half or so). The original .png (what I actually uploaded) doesn't at 51.6KiB.

Also obviously this would be less data in non-pixel format (well, it'd likely be eaten up by overhead for packaging, though after that it would allow tons of art for negligible data cost). Would be smaller as an svg for example (or an swf).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Dithering is much older than jpeg.

They used dithering in printed media, so it was transfered to digital media as a way to save on color depth, before jpeg got invented.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Avif, without alpha channel, 17.6 KB

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago

We listened to music as 41kB RealAudio files that sounded like the song was underwater, which was the style at the time.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago

Fyi, dithering hinders most modern compression algorythms, making the pic bigger.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Dithering is so fucking cool. At some point I wanna check out that game that uses a ton of really stylized dithering - return of the obra djin I think?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Dithering is still to this day extremely useful for making custom wall art in Minecraft using maps, because maps have a very specific and limited pallette.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Obra Dinn's filter hurt my eyes. A lot of these filters do and glad many are toggles in the options.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

They looked like they just came from a vault from fallout

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Back when image compression was just reducing the resolution and color depth.

[–] einfach_orangensaft 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i mean yeah, its a honest loss of information, jpg on the other hand introduces compression artifacts that are basically hallucinations, meaning it pretends to have more data than it actually has and humans compensate for that thru image recognition and fantasy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This.exe file including music and visuals is 4KB

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I miss dithering. It's got a certain je ne sais quoi.

load more comments
view more: next ›