this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
1155 points (97.3% liked)

Political Memes

7972 readers
1754 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1155
Limited Freedom (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 19 hours ago

You remember that first amendment thing we used to have here?

Yeah... neither does our government

[–] [email protected] 47 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

For now. Let's see what happens when it's budget time again. They'll probably bury it in there because we live in hell.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Yep, how the government works. Keep spamming a bill that the general public doesn't want until it sticks. But then no such efforts to repeal it and we're stuck with the flaming piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago

Good. Holy 💩

[–] [email protected] 30 points 20 hours ago

America can't be taken seriously anymore.

It's a good thing Russia gave half of a wakeup call to the rest of the free world to arm the fuck up 3 years ago. We know America can't be relied on for anything anymore.

[–] peteypete420 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How do you enforce anti boycott, how do you force someone to spend their money?

Dont get me wrong Ill know they will try again, but wow.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If you’re an American paying taxes you can’t boycott Israel. It doesn’t even need to be a law.

Seems like they’re trying to turn boycott in to a dirty word.

[–] peteypete420 5 points 17 hours ago

Yes yes I know where my tax dollars go, thank you. Well, ok actually not entirely, but yes to fund the irl fucking evil empire.

But boycotts make me think of private citzens not buying a product, or from a store or provider, etc.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago

Nazi America

Brought to you by millions of fascist fucks, including your own family and friends.

Buy a gun.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Any government that tells you what you can complain about

Is by definition a Totalerian government

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

Worse than that - they're trying to tell us what we can spend our money on.

Which according to the horse shit Citizens United ruling is free speech for corporations. But not the people in em I guess.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

This will go down in flames.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

how this reminds me russia....

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Hey big shoutout to all the Redditors and Lemmy guys who told me that we can have no restrictions on free speech because if we restrict Nazis they will restrict us if they ever gain power.

Welp, here ya go...like I told you...and many of you blocked and/or banned me for saying it. Ironic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

The bill got pulled. And even if it didn't it's such a blatant and egregious violation of 1A that even Trump's pet judges would have to shoot it down out of fear of the precedent it would set and what would happen if ever they lose power for any length of time.

That's the conversation I've been having with some people cheering on Trump's immigration moves. I've pointed out the machine the individual bricks seems to be building, and when they support that too because Trump will only use it on the "right sort of people" I point out that Trump won't be in power forever, and ask him what he'd think if someone like Harris or AOC had that same power. That's when they suddenly get it, because the idea that the same machinery could be brought against them is not something they consider.

The first question you should ask when considering "Should the government have this power?" is "If the people I oppose the very most had this power, what would they do with it?" If you're not OK with the answer to that, then the government shouldn't have that power.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

5 bucks says the people who told you that were, in fact, nazis

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Hard to say. They mostly seemed like college liberals still living at home

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

been my experience that that people saying "We have to protect the nazis" are either nazis, or nazis pretending to be their idea of librul to infiltrate,

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I have a relevant cartoon that I cant post for some reason...will try again...

[(https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c4568c91-00a0-4bb2-b67e-f32dce46183b.jpeg)]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

The markdown for the pic is slightly incorrect and causing problems on my app so here's the fix:

![link to your image] (https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c4568c91-00a0-4bb2-b67e-f32dce46183b.jpeg)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't there already an anti boycott law on the books?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah. I worked for a US-headquartered multinational in Asia, and we had to do a whole training about how we had to be scrupulous in not doing anything that could be interpreted as a boycott of Israel otherwise the company would be breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you make the 1st Amendment illegal, the rest of the Constitution cannot be far behind.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

if? people have already been blackbagged for their speech. this is just encoding something already in effect.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How tf can u ban a boycott, how is that even possible let alone provable 🤦 Politics aside if I js don't like a brand that endorses or has ties to Israel would I then be subject to charges. How u trynna force people to buy from certain companies, what if I was bruk, would I be breaking the law? 🤡

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This will probably be used to target protestors and organizers of political movements.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Excuse me I saw you drinking flat water where is your soda stream ice this one get this one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

Yeah trump and maga have been wiping their ass with that document for a while. I don’t think it’s a thing anymore

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Didn't CU rule that spending money is free speech? So isn't compelling the spending of money compelling speech? Sounds straight up unconstitutional.(as if that fucking matters these days)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Republicans have been undermining the constitution for decades. Now they straight up wipe their ass with it. The Goal has always been a christofacist dictatorship

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

No, Citizens United ruled that corporations are allowed to engage in elections just like citizens. It said nothing about money, protesting, or anything else.

Still not a good ruling for any reason, but not really relevant here.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Rich people spending money is free speech.

Anti-genocide activists not spending money is terrorism.

AKA the usual.

load more comments
view more: next ›