IcyToes

joined 2 years ago
[–] IcyToes 9 points 3 days ago

And they were trying to embarrass him on live TV and admit they are weak. Zelenksky cannot do this for morale reasons.

They were trying to get him to kiss his ass publicly and thank him for being manipulated for a minerals deal.

It was really ugly viewing.

Fuck that worm, Vance and fuck fragile Trump.

[–] IcyToes 5 points 6 days ago
[–] IcyToes 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well this is only for accounts with over 100 hours of highlights. If you have more, you either are abusing it or doing this semi seriously and should consider backing up actual highlights.

Videos are massive and nothing is free. Storage costs. People should backup stiff they care about.

[–] IcyToes 1 points 2 weeks ago

But maybe could be a good place for furry dating.

[–] IcyToes 1 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps due to the same reason UK avoided tariff threats.

Spineless leader. UK is unfortunately a lapdog in this special relationship.

[–] IcyToes 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the UK, it says both. One above the other.

Spineless and pathetic.

[–] IcyToes 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Doubt it, and he'd not want to tank the value for himself, so he'd likely go for a slow, steady sale.

[–] IcyToes 2 points 2 weeks ago

I agree on the point about being clueless.

You can invest in a technology and be safe. Take nuclear power for example. It's just the risks are more obvious because of the past.

If you look at Vance, they're clearly driving this objection, and wanted us to demonstrate they are not the only ones. China is winning in AI and they were willing to sign. You can have technology and safeguards/ethics.

27
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by IcyToes to c/[email protected]
 

Looks like the UK is leading the world by shamelessly sacrificing AI safety at the altar of Trump. Appeasement never works and we have gone backwards towards again being spineless lapdogs in this special relationship.

I remember when we shamelessly followed them in supporting the Iraq war via a sexed up document.

AI can be very error prone and has the potential to be seriously dangerous. It has been said to be used for military purposes and when life and death is in the hands of a computer's decision, who is going to take responsibility for this? Dangerous. We need protections.

We may be on the wrong side of history here. Cowardly from Keir's Labour. I wonder if we traded this for zero tariffs.

[–] IcyToes 4 points 3 weeks ago

She sounds vile AF. Toxic.

[–] IcyToes 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think this is a gamble type thing. No win, no fee investors, but they'll make a killing if it pays off.

[–] IcyToes 9 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Sounds like a caching issue. If you were logged in as them, profile would work. Feels like it's caching personalised sections, which it should not.

[–] IcyToes 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's used on a few Roblox games.

 

Analysis from the BBC (who are usually quite motivated and effective at justifying Israel actions).

The sheer devastation is incredible. 66% of buildings damaged. 90% of the population displaced. Water and sanitation systems non-functional. 53/500 needed lorries entering the territory per day (down from 142). They're not even trying to look they're helping now. The population have been squeezed into over-populated tent cities.

It feels like they think if they create the conditions for disease and it kills people, they don't get blamed.

To me, it's hard to think of a way this could get closer to genocide. Absolutely sick.

Israel seem to be galvanised by inaction of the world and probably looking to do the same in Lebanon. Is Yemen after? Where does this stop?

view more: next ›