this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
726 points (98.7% liked)

Fuck AI

2295 readers
143 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] captain_aggravated 91 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He's not just a regular moron. He's the product of the greatest minds of a generation working together with the express purpose of building the dumbest moron who ever lived. And you just put him in charge of the entire facility.

--GLaDOS

[–] Steamymoomilk 22 points 1 week ago

God i love portal

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

This quote really describes so many aspects of the world right now

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

Elon Musk: "Let's have it run the government. But fire everyone before we try it first."

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's worse than that. It's right just often enough to make people think it's right all the time.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

CEOs: Finally using software is like talking to an intellectual equal

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

No way, the overconfident, incompetent, very often factually wrong narcissist sociopaths that run big corporations think that a chat bot that acts just like them is the best business investment in the history of mankind?

I can't believe it!

The second best idea ever is using that chatbot to read all our emails for us, and then just have meetings for us, and send us the transcripts of all our AI doppleganger avatars making business plans based on hallucinating our actual personalities and knowledge sets, that'll save so much time!

(Not kidding about that, that is actually being worked on.)

https://people.com/zoom-ceo-wants-to-use-ai-to-create-digital-clones-that-can-attend-meetings-for-you-8659456

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For real. Asked chatgpt to help with a batch script. Literally the easiest thing it could possibly program. And guess what? Almost every example it gave was wrong. It seemed to know a lot about the command line program I was trying to run but it didn't really understand what it was repeating to me.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
"Oh I'm sorry!  You're right mxzlptx.jar was deprecated in 2008.  Here's the actual script that will definitely work 100%."

*INCORRECT BUZZER*

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

It kept fucking up double quotes and escape characters. Like, if it can't get that right in a batch file it's hopeless.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like when you ask it to help, and it tells you to import a library that would solve your problem exactly, then you google it and it doesn’t exist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I once tried to use it to find the title of a book my wife enjoyed in her childhood based on her description of the plot. It described a possible book that could be written with that content and even suggested a title.

Cool, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What gets me is video game info. It's taking the info from a wiki, that is accurate; still manages to rearrange its output of factual information to turn it into bullshit that isn't even remotely accurate.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it doesn’t understand any words at all. Everything is a web of probabilities that it can attach words to that are believable. That’s the magic.

Facts, reason, intelligence - Nope.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

They definitely have it working well enough that it can create coherent sentences that are entirely readable and understandable. Now if they could just make it so that the text it generates is actually factually accurate they might have a useful tool. I still wouldn't call it intelligence though. Spicy auto-summarize still would not think and reason for itself.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

It's so scary that the top line is an AI response now in google.

Lazy unaware people will just assume its correct,

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could be, but my (limited) experience with ChatGPT and PHP was quite different. This was in 2023, so it may have deteriorated since.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

That version most likely burned the equivalent output of the sun to run it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What if Grok just turned out to be Elon himself? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

That would answer a lot of questions. But if Elon turned out to be Grok himself, it would answer even more.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

If Musk claimed to be doing all the Grok answers I would assume it is really just the guy he paid to play Path of Exhile.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I really wish people would understand that "AI" isn't just LLMs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is so, but LLM's are the ~~only~~ most visible public facing ones and they're the dumbshit technology that every company on Earth is now trying to shoehorn into every product. They're what people see, interact with, and get pissed off by.

Learning neural nets are good for various specific types of pattern recognition tasks, but trying to be an electronic butler who answers your questions ain't one of them and it never will be.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

LLM's are the only public facing ones

They aren't at all. Mixamo uses AI to generate animated skeleton models that follow dance videos. Photoshop has "generative fill", plenty of AI is public facing and used constantly besides LLMs. Many of these things have sped up workflows to a tremendous degree. One of my favorite music programs can use AI in order to replicate certain harmonics for instruments which would have taken me hours by hand before.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The audio side is incredible. I can basically sample the nonlinearities of audio gear that would usually cost fuck loads to own a rack of. It’s limited still but it really injects that grit you want from certain gear that algorithms can’t touch

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Well, okay, they're the mainly public facing ones. Gemini, GPT, Copilot, whatever the hell Musk's one is, Grok? All of that bullshit is just LLM's, the ones nobody asked for and nobody wants. That's what everyone is complaining about.

[–] heavydust 4 points 1 week ago

You're right that some AIs are useful, but we are literally flooded with "scam as a service" web sites that sell LLMs, and they are hyped by people who can't code or do anything useful in life who tell us that we are gatekeeping knowledge, and those people would be very happy if we were all unemployed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

A fair point but the hypetrain isn't done running people over yet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I love how when I try to search for a setting I can't find the stupid AI answer is always "go to settings, find the setting and turn it off" when that isn't a setting and never was on the software. It just spouts out to do the thing I can't find.

Generally the first search response below the AI slop is a five year old reddit post pointing out that the setting doesn't exist or the real directions from the official support page that are completely different.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Samesies.

It's comically tragic how much venture capital they destroyed to make something that sucks so bad no one wants it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

But we already have people that can do that

Tech Bro: .... yeah, but ours can do it billions of times faster and more often!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Allow me to fix that for you:

computer scientists: We have invented virtual dumbasses who are constantly wrong: Tech CEOs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

This gives me a constant headache