this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)

News

28120 readers
3603 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case challenging the legality of the FCC’s Universal Service Fund, which raises $9 billion annually to expand phone and internet access.

The 5th Circuit Court previously ruled the fund unconstitutional.

It held that Congress improperly delegated legislative power to the FCC and that the FCC unlawfully transferred authority to a private company, the Universal Service Administrative Company.

The FCC defends the fund as lawful, citing congressional authorization. A decision is expected by June, amid heightened scrutiny of federal agency powers.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It held that Congress improperly delegated legislative power to the FCC and that the FCC unlawfully transferred authority to a private company, the Universal Service Administrative Company.

So they're gonna use that same logic to prevent privatization of the Postal Service, right?

[–] gravitas_deficiency 18 points 4 days ago

anakin_padme_right.meme

[–] _haha_oh_wow_ 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Here’s a reminder that packing the 5th circuit with extremist judges was a large part of the Southern Strategy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

If it makes no sense, it must be the fifth.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not like the ISPs would really care anyways to expand. More pocket money to them.

[–] atzanteol 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Expansion is only profitable if there are enough customers to justify the infrastructure costs and people are willing to pay the costs for it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They already got billions in subsidies for this very purpose.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_ 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I believe it's more than half a trillion total at this point. We were supposed to have nationwide fiber since the 90s and we still mostly don't have the country covered. WTF did they do with all that money?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

~~It was invested in "emerging markets".... i.e. South American countries.~~

Can't find a source, so I'll retract my statement:

Here are some articles talking about high level overview:

https://www.mackinac.org/blog/2024/why-government-funded-internet-isnt-happening-again

https://nationaleconomicseditorial.com/2017/11/27/americans-fiber-optic-internet/

https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/the-42-billion-internet-program-that-has-connected-0-people

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-book-of-broken-promis_b_5839394

I'll see if I can find the sources, I've not looked at them in a while.

[–] phdepressed 4 points 4 days ago

Paid themselves to "look into it" then expanded to one more house than before.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

As a taxpayer I would like to know WTF the USAC is doing with 9 Billion dollars a year 'cuz were sure not seeing much of that investment.

I honestly can't figure out what Congress is doing with these kinds of programs. There's another one called BEAD (Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment) that was created in 2021 that had yet to get a single household connected to the Internet as of September 2024 despite having already spent $20 BILLION dollars!

So for Fiscal Years 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 the US Federal Government according to official figures spent a combined total of 46 BILLION FUCKING DOLLARS ((9x4)+20) and has nearly nothing to show for it.

Yeah, the courts needs to be looking into this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Not sure how much but a big chunk of that money goes towards E-rate. Basically a piggy bank that USAC uses to subsidize networking and Internet connectivity technology across the country for K-12 schools and libraries. And let me tell you, if they didn't most schools would be still be running extremely outdated networking tech and Internet connectivity. Which would mean American schools falling even further behind on technology literacy, greater security holes in the network, and much more inequality across education across the country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Who's to say the purpose of "Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment" is to connect houses.? Or, to put it another way, NASA has received billions of dollars and also hasn't connected any houses. It's easy to understand why: NASA doesn't do that.

Who is to say that BEAD is trying to make last mile connections? If they're not them your entire premise is wrong. It'd be like complaining that NASA has spent hundreds of billions of dollars and still hasn't launch a single commercial passenger.

I live in a rural area and we're seeing a pretty rapid expansion of broadband connections. We had DSL and cable in some places but now there are large fiber deployments to new neighborhoods and the DSL and cable areas are having fiber service made available over time.

Just using caps lock and BILLION doesn't make a good argument. Nor does pretending that broadband expansion isn't happening or creating arbitrary inapplicable standards for programs ("NASA hasn't flown commercial passengers: WORTHLESS").

As a taxpayer I would like to know WTF the USAC is doing

You should have just stopped there and started learning what USAC is and what it spends its money on; instead of screaming that the sky is falling because you personally don't understand a federal program.