this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
370 points (94.9% liked)

World News

41034 readers
4943 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Denmark’s Defense Intelligence Service warns that Russia could launch a large-scale war in Europe within five years if NATO appears weak or divided, especially if the U.S. does not intervene.

The report outlines a timeline where Russia could attack a neighboring country within six months, escalate to a regional Baltic conflict in two years, and potentially engage NATO-wide by 2029.

The assessment comes as Trump pressures NATO members to increase defense spending and has suggested the U.S. might not defend allies who fail to meet financial commitments.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

With what resources are they gonna do that with?

[–] [email protected] 194 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (23 children)

Title is misleading, since there is already a major war in Europe started by russia

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Headlines from 2011

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (5 children)

With what? They can't even handle war in Ukraine and they run out of plenty of hardware.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I do not have an English translation but in this interview a lieutenant general of the German Bundeswehr says that they are observing that not all new supplies are being pushed to the Ukrainian front lines and instead new stockpiles are being created.

My personal expectation is that Putin will attempt one more push in Ukraine once mud season is over, take what he can get and then agree to another peace deal (Minsk 3 anyone?). He will then take some time to restructure and reinforce the military before again "coming to the aid of suppressed Russian minorities", this time in places like Georgia, Moldova or Armenia. Ukraine is off the table because they will use the time to reinforce as well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could be, who knows. Though the countries listed are not part of NATO and are weak. And at least in Moldova it's not easy as Russia doesn't border it and for Armenia they have to go through Georgia first.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Though the countries listed are not part of NATO and are weak.

Perfect to get the collective confidence back on its feed after getting a literal bloody nose in Ukraine.

for Armenia they have to go through Georgia first

Two for the price of one. That's a bargain!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, if they could foresee the consequences of their own actions, the war in Ukraine wouldn't even have started

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

TBH it's still early for evaluating consequences - it might still prove beneficial for Russia, especially with orange in chief.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Anything less than total victory will lead to economic collapse for Russia and at this point it's pretty much impossible even with Trump in office. They are cooked in any case.

[–] freebee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They wasted hundreds of thousands in the meat grinder... The final outcome would have to be absolutely massive in favour of Russia for it to still be beneficial. Unlikely.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'd laugh at you if this was 2024. Today? I'm uncomfortable with such statements.

[–] Habahnow 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The new Axis powers of Russia, China, North Korea and U.S.A against the European powers. 10 years ago that would seem ridiculous, now, not too far fetched.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If they capture Ukraine, they will have a fresh pool of conscripts, not to mention Ukraine’s impressive military technology.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good point. Ukrainians doesn't have that much of weapons and are heavily reliant on west. Except for drones, but at least some major parts are bought from other countries. But yes, it would increase Russian military to some extent, though I doubt Ukrainians would be good Russian soldiers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ukrainian conscripts will have a line of known-loyal barrier troops behind them with orders to shoot them if they fail to obey. Old Russian Army tactic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, sure, but that still doesn't make them good soldiers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

russians aren't known for utilizing good soldiers anyway. they are known for utilizing meat shields, though

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

So is Ukraine in Asia or something?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

Major war already started 3 years ago. Europe sat on its hands, and America is looking for the door.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Man Europe needs to build up their military quick. Too long you've relied on the US but now the US is unreliable depending on who is in office

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

Boy, it sure would be bad if the US population had voted a Russian stooge into the presidency for the next four years. Oh wait…

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What are they gonna start a major war with? Their one "functional" 5th Gen "stealth" fighter that has the radar cross section of a Boeing 747 and no replacement parts?

They gonna start shitting out t-34s again like it's WW2?

They have lost the majority of their best vehicles and their trained soldiers.

If nukes didn't exist they would already have been obliterated by now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

I’m tired of living in weeks, boss

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Surely putin will be dead by then?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

One can hope

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Either France or the UK can easily fill in. Both have nuclear submarines. Mutually assured destruction baby.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is about how quickly the Russian war machine and economy can rebuild their capability to attack again. IIRC the report by the Danish Intelligence Service assumes that the Ukraine war stops now and that Europe does not increase its defensive capabilities.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Obviously the headline should have said "special military operation."

load more comments
view more: next ›