Cry all you want big boy, the science is on the side of us non-brainwashed, rational people who understand the need for actual gun regulation in a civilised country.

Too bad the US hardly qualifies to that group any more. Third world level literacy rates, so many homeless that human shit is an actual issue in supposedly civilised cities, and firearms as the leading cause of death for children.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/darreonnadavis/2023/10/05/firearms-now-no-1-cause-of-death-for-us-children---while-drug-poisoning-enters-top-5/

There's a literal mountai in the of evidence showing that all you need to do to start facing this problem is reasonable nation-wide gun regulation. Something everyone knows works and something that you won't find science against, because gun regulation being the answer is as clear to most people as is the fact that the Earth is round, not Flat.

But you will find Flat Earther crazies who won't believe in the science even when their own science proves that they are indeed wrong.

You're emotional. You get so angry when you're reminded that you go against science because you don't have the balls to actually use your own brain.

https://epirev.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/1/140.full.pdf+html

And you having "shot guns" doesn't make you an expert on guns

Oh yeah no, it doesn't bear any rationale to this argument. It's just there because gun nuts always default to the "you're just afraid of my pew-pew sticks, that's why you support gun regulation". Nah. I love guns, they're fun. But you know what I care more about than loud bangs? That children don't have to live in fear of some incel fucktards charging into their school with a pimped out AR15 with a bumpstock.

There's literally not a single peer reviewed study that concludes that less gun control is better, for anything.

But I'm sure the lack of science won't stop you, just like it doesn't stop Flat Earthers.

You're really just here to prove my point about the willfull ignorance of nuts like you. So... thanks, I guess?

laughs in Gordon Ramsay

And also, it's possible to be a massive hypocrite, like their parents and their parents' parents 'fore 'em.

It's really not.

It's not porn, because it's not porn.

It's not our fault that you think of everything as sexual.

There is nothing sexual about a naked body. If you ever can, do come visit Finland. By your logic, anyone visiting a sauna with someone else there is either committing or being the victim of a sex crime? (You're not allowed to wear a bathing suit in the sauna for health reasons.)

Any gun nut feel like arguing for insanity that are US gun laws?

All you need to do is ignore science and reality and every other country outsider of the US and be convinced that undiagnosed schizophrenics being able to buy a shedload of semi-automatic weapons is necessary for democracy.

All I need to do is remind you that there's not a single piece of study that supports any of the arguments of the gun nutters.

(Also, just because it seems to matter to these nuts, I started shooting at 12 and have handled everything from old officer's pistols to shotguns to modern assault rifles, machine guns, grenades, mines, and even AA guns. Shooting is fun, yeah, but having fun isn't more important than making sure children don't have to live under the constant threat of their fellow pupils pulling out a semi-auto with a bump-stock.)

Its anyone rational who's seen conservatives, really, but I enjoyed the reference.

But if it does not, it is still used against Israel. What do you want Israel to do?

To stop the genocide they're committing. I thought this was pretty clear from all the protests?

I think this is really unfair criticism.

I think it's generally agreed that slaughtering children and raping and torturing people is wrong. Perhaps you were raised differently?

So like, pokemon would be NSFW?

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Homo-sapiens-sapiens

Homo sapiens sapiens, in anthropology and paleontology, the subspecies of Homo sapiens that consists of the only living members of genus Homo, modern human beings. Traditionally, this subspecies designation was used by paleontologists and anthropologists to separate modern human beings from more-archaic members of Homo sapiens.

you understand and agree that Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity.

i don’t quite believe this statement,

Oh you're denying that Israel is guilty of anything, just alleged to have been doing naughty things? I'm shocked. Yeah, that's exactly the point of this whole thread. You're a pathetic defender of crimes against humanity because you're too much of a pussy to take the stand you know is the moral one, because you have relationships with people whom you're not brave enough to disagree with.

go read through my posts, you’ll find the shit i’m talking about.

There's not enough money in this world for me to go and read the brainfarts of a person like you.

i already have, they say that there is reasonable grounds for israel to have been, or to commit genocide. Likewise, there is supporting evidence of “war crimes” being committed.

Still avoiding a clear yes on Israel being guilty of anything. Mere "oh it COULD be". No, it's not a maybe. It's a fact. A FACT which you keep denying, the pathetic child rapist defender you are.

You're just so bad at this, honestly, keep the philosophy larping to some discord or some shit for at least the next five years. :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea

Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)

Do you think NK is democratic because they have "democratic" in their name?

Shouldn't it be on them to prove it is a "fabrication"?

Like if I made the claim that you enjoy breaking spaghetti in half when you make any (and no-one is watching), how would you ever possibly prove that it's not true?