this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
370 points (94.9% liked)

World News

41102 readers
3915 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Denmark’s Defense Intelligence Service warns that Russia could launch a large-scale war in Europe within five years if NATO appears weak or divided, especially if the U.S. does not intervene.

The report outlines a timeline where Russia could attack a neighboring country within six months, escalate to a regional Baltic conflict in two years, and potentially engage NATO-wide by 2029.

The assessment comes as Trump pressures NATO members to increase defense spending and has suggested the U.S. might not defend allies who fail to meet financial commitments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd laugh at you if this was 2024. Today? I'm uncomfortable with such statements.

[–] Habahnow 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The new Axis powers of Russia, China, North Korea and U.S.A against the European powers. 10 years ago that would seem ridiculous, now, not too far fetched.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

USA's secretary of defense is already saying that Ukraine should let go of the occupied territories, will not be allowed in NATO and will not get any security guarantees. Basically saying to let Russia win and opening the door for more invasions by Russia.

[–] Corkyskog 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well most of the rare earth materials Trump wants are in Russian occupied territory, or on the border of it.

[–] Habahnow 2 points 1 week ago

yeah, that's the only positive aspect, there may actually be a reason for conservatives to push for defending ukraine and regaining their land.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

The new Axis powers of Russia, China, North Korea and U.S.A against the European powers.

Considering sherlock holme's famous statement "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"

So then, yes; though one can hope.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but won't Trump be busy with the Great War on Greenland, Panama and Canada?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't put it past Trump to make a deal with Putin so that he gets Greenland and can mine the fuck out of it's untapped mineral resources.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how Greenland is Putin's to give. Denmark has a military and Greenlanders wouldn't just sit back and let themselves be annexed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Oh sorry, I meant more like allying with Putin's side if war breaks out for the potential of getting Greenland.