this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
651 points (99.1% liked)

News

24197 readers
4018 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Clarence Thomas criticized the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for ignoring Supreme Court precedent in a case involving David Smith, convicted of attempted murder, whose sentence was overturned due to procedural concerns.

Thomas argued the court violated the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act by re-evaluating evidence rather than deferring to previous rulings.

Critics highlighted Thomas’s hypocrisy, noting his role in overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022, disregarding decades of precedent and leading to abortion bans in over 20 states.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can some of these old people please, fucking die already!

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shush. We don’t want that happening right now. Old Uncle Tom is somehow not the worst it could get.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's not the only one I'm talking about. The U.S. is run by the worse retirement home I have ever seen.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Send help. Grandpa is fucking crazy and he is waving a gun around.

[–] vaultdweller013 4 points 21 hours ago

Cant im reinforcing myself in the basement, you can join me if ya wish but if you touch my sandwich makings im taking your hand.

[–] [email protected] 108 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A SCOTUS member accepting bribes should come with the death penalty

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cold-ass response. Imagine you’re the dude and were reading along here and maybe for the first time realizing that people don’t like you specifically for your actions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And not a painless one. I'm thinking the thing they did to highway thieves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Slowly dipped in a vat of acid foot-first.

[–] Mouselemming 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How about 4 racehorses facing outwards at an intersection, tied to his arms and legs, and fire a starting gun?

Nah, that's too old fashioned and could hurt a horse. Four cybertrucks. Nobody cares if they get fucked up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Actual tar and feather.

Slow cooking death.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We can just botch a lethal injection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

So a typical lethal injection?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 150 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Clarance respectfully go fuck yourself.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He can disrespectfully fuck himself, too.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

With a very rusty pitchfork.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Rusty Trident 🔱? Don’t knock Aquaman.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Right in the ear.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

And since you ignore precedent, take a step back, and fuck yourself again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 130 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He can fuck off and die. Painfully, publicly, soon, and slowly.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nah, he can live until the current nightmare is over, then he can fuck off and die.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He will retire in the next 4 years and Trump will appoint a 20 yo to the supreme court

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s gonna be Aileen Cannon. She’s already proven that her only judicial competencies are complete deference and fealty to trump and disdain for impartiality and procedure, which are the only qualifications they’re looking for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

That would be by far the worst outcome.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's part of the nightmare though. Only after he's gone would it be over.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

Fucking Handkerchief head

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been waiting for this particular bit of brazen hypocrisy.

By ignoring precedent in order to issue rulings clearly intended to establish precedents, the wholly corrupt and compromised SC effectively guaranteed that sooner or later, they'd have to do this.

Outside of the warped context of a corrupt and compromised court, it's actually very simple:

Either precedent matters, in which case their Roe ruling, their gratuity ruling, their immunity ruling and a number of others are self-evidently flawed, or precedent doesn't matter, in which case no other court has any duty to consider anything the SC does.

One or the other.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

They have no intention of being consistent, or uphold the law; it can be both They will soon start shoving their political opponents in jail too.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

(For anyone unfamiliar with Uncle Ruckus, he was an Uncle Tom type character, and a white supremacist)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Only difference is Clarence Thomas gets paid to throw his beliefs out the window, Uncle Ruckus (no relation) did it just for the love of white people.

Actually now that I think about it, I'm not really sure why Clarence Thomas does the shit he does...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He was educated in Catholic schools and was going to be a Priest. Thomas has done nothing but uphold the white Christian man's power and privilege his entire life.

Had to sit through someone's gushing fanboy talk about this last year and I nearly threw up. He's a gross misogynist and fucking smug about it too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

Many a person thinks that by upholding the power of the white Christian man they can remove one of the adjectives

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Leopard’s case?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can never tell with Thomas if he's been bribed in advance or is soliciting a gratuity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Usually it’s both

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago

He's upset they followed his precedent.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Am I wrong, or is he just signaling to allies how he will rule if this reaches the Supreme Court...?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Was there ever a question?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah? So who's going to do anything about it?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corruption just keeps on working without consequence.

400 million temporarily embarrassed swindlers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I think it's safe to say Americans are now permanently embarrassed.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Clarence Thomas is a bribe accepting crooked hypocrite who falls to pieces the second the doesn't get what he wants. How is this news? I thought everyone knew that already?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Precedent died in 2016. It means less than nothing now.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Thomas’s hypocrisy

looks at article

He's talking about a lower court not following a Supreme Court precedent.

The Supreme Court is able to overrule Supreme Court precedent in later cases. It happens only rarely, but it does happen. There's a list of such rulings somewhere I remember on Wikipedia, several pages. Roe v. Wade was one such example.

But lower courts are not supposed to do that.

goes looking for Wikipedia page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions

This is a list of decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States that have been explicitly overruled, in part or in whole, by a subsequent decision of the Court. It does not include decisions that have been abrogated by subsequent constitutional amendment or by subsequent amending statutes.

As of 2018, the Supreme Court had overruled more than 300 of its own cases.[1]

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Thank you for posting the wiki article, and regardless of how hypocritical this specific headline actually is, fuck Clarence Thomas for all the other reasons too. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/releases/durbin-reveals-omissions-of-gifted-private-travel-to-justice-clarence-thomas-from-harlan-crow

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

It's nuance that doesn't matter.

The fact is that this Supreme Court is a joke, and why should anyone respect it in any way?

He is the one who destroyed the credibility of the court. The precedent that the SC has set is that precedent doesn't matter. The judge should do what he thinks is fair. He shouldn't be bound by rules that very clearly don't bind anyone else, including the fifth district court.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›