this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
28 points (88.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36303 readers
794 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Clarification: I mean a person who has actually been dead for a while and suddenly they're alive again

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 38 minutes ago

It would no longer be the world-view destroying event that it would have have been 100 years ago. The moment someone came up with the idea of a matter-energy transporter, we had the idea of how someone could come back from the dead. Today we know exactly how it would be done - we just lack the technology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 43 minutes ago

Get killed because that's a zombie

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago

I swear to God Dave if you found the necronomicon again

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 hours ago

Something that nobody seems to have touched upon is the fact that many dead people are embalmed.

If you suddenly came alive again after being embalmed, you'd suddenly become dead again.

Also, post-mortem examinations are not uncommon if the cause of death was not clear. Again this might lead to instant re-death.

Finally, if the cause of death /was/ clear (such as trauma), then again, that may likely result in instant re-death.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If it happened frequently enough, the government would find a way to tax it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So frequency equals taxes?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Let's hope they never start counting all the times you jacked it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Or took a step, or breath, or blinked.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago

Realistically, Netflix documentary, lots of interviews, newspaper articles, sharing by facebook uncles. If that person is religious, either a following or a statement about seeing the light.

[–] andrew_bidlaw 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Years and years of fucking with legal system of your country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Not really. My country's legal system, at least, foresees that someone may be mistakenly declared dead and so provides in the Todeserklärungsgesetz (§ 24):

(1)Wenn der für tot Erklärte persönlich vor Gericht erscheint und die Aufhebung der Todeserklärung verlangt, so hat das Gericht, falls die Identität des Antragstellers mit dem für tot Erklärten unzweifelhaft feststeht, ohne weiteres Verfahren die Aufhebung der Todeserklärung auszusprechen.

which translates to:

If the person who has been declared dead appears personally in front of a court and demands the cancellation of the declaration of death, then the court has to, if there is no doubt as to the identity of the applicant with the person who has been declared dead, without further procedure declare the annulment of the declaration of death.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

True. I can imagine a kafkaic scene with the reborn person talking to some official, telling them that they're dead and they can't be of any help, despite them standing right in front of them.

[–] loaExMachina 24 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Most of them are buried, so I'd say they die again.

[–] andrew_bidlaw 9 points 5 hours ago

Unless they are Uma Turman with her masochistic palm-fist strike training.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Or burned into ash.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago

We have examples of people being misidentified as dead, who rise either at the hospital, mortuary, or after.

It is speculated this is one of reasons 'wakes' were established, just to make sure the loved one was well and truly dead before committing them to earth.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 hours ago

They would go "Who was elected?" and immediately return to their casket.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

She simply goes on with her life.

Yes, I know her, she is well over 80 years old now.

[–] Apytele 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

As others have stated, you're still going to have to define dead, and you're going to have to define the question of what happens. I suspect you may not actually have any specifications for either and are just having fun thinking up and about random shit (that's not a dig; I share this hobby).

But for the sake of further discussion, let's add a few more specific (but non-limiting) questions just to help the discussion along.

I'm going to exclude cases where they're already deeply buried or cremated because the obvious answer is "stay there" with the exception of a purely magic related situation where their body just spontaneously recorporeates somewhere? What would be the social consequences to that, how would people react, and what would happen to any property they left behind? This actually raises a lot of other questions related to the social dynamics such as:

  • how would the people immediately around them react.
  • what proof would people need to believe it?
  • are they still on the hook for their student and medical debt
  • would it likely start a new religion and how would the existing religions feel about it from most to least happy?

There's also some physical questions such as how much skin, muscle, brain, and other organ breakdown would have occurred and which part would have the most damage.

There's questions about whether or not they're likely to have experienced something spiritual (including what we DO know about near-death experiences like the commonality of a peaceful feeling or spiritual experiences.

I gave no great answers to any of these and additionally encourage others to ask similar hypothetical details to ask about.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The definition of death is that it is not reversible, so it would mean that the person never was dead in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Thanks, I'll keep that take in my pocket for later. "Your honor, you can't possibly prove that in the future a superintelligence won't be able to reconstruct enough of the victim's brain to resurrect them, and hence they aren't dead and I can't have committed murder!".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Depends. Once you're dead and everything stops working, coming back means dealing with decomposition and a shitton of toxins. Can the system deal with it naturally? What's the first stuff to go during decay and can the body do without them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

This is what I was thinking. You’d be going around in a partially decayed body, smelling like hell till all your cells could refresh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Nobody would believe it, even if there was a live video feed of the death and the resurrection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Depending on your definition people actually have come back from the dead. Friend of mine for one. I'm lucky to live in that timeline.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Death is rather difficult to define precisely. If you define it as "the cessation of consciousness," then you die every night. Every sleep cycle has some portions of minimal brain activity. There's nobody home for these periods.