this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
846 points (98.5% liked)

Comic Strips

13195 readers
1786 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
846
beeherhe (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a good job they explained the joke.

[–] can 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wasn't there some theory about comics being improved by removing the final panel?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Definitely. I was going to post this:

Remove 4th panel.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

The "ew" saved it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The most beautiful font ever. Although, this Metropolis is pretty nice, too.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Love the lowercase, hate the uppercase. Look at what they did to my boy B.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I really love the numbers, though.

I've discovered that it's a horrible screen font, though: far too spindly to be easily readable. I still use it, but I have to make it larger than usual and bold, and it's still a little hard to make out sometimes.

Oh, what we sacrifice for aesthetics.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have the urge to drink martini and rewatch The Great Gatsby.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And Jeeves & Wooster, and Poirot.

Poirot is obviously the inspiration here, in style and name.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This has an art nouveau feeling.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'd say Art Deco, Art Nouveau's successor, but obviously there aren't fine lines between them.

When I think Art Nouveau, I think wavy, curvy script; everything was just a little psychedelic in Art Nouveau.

1920's, in any case.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wait, is this Comic Sans? Some just want to see the internet burn

[–] weker01 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel like the comic sans hate did die down in recent years and justly so. It was overhated IMHO. It's an ok font for certain uses. The problem was mostly people misusing it to serve roles it was never designed for.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I saw a meme where it was "big brain" to use it for their IDE/notepad so I tried it out and my god it's not even funny how legible and easy on the eye it is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

They're good, but I find both to be marginally less legible than Source Code Pro where the i and j are clearer, particularly when next to each other. The a is less clear in Source Code Pro though, so I'm still looking for the perfect font.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It will look good in a children story-book. Not in a professional email.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

Sure, but we use Papyrus, not Comic Sans.

[–] BudgetBandit 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know a person who professionally does something with text. She made it her mission to format every single email in ComicSans, bold, italic, red, centered.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

See that's funny. My boss using comic sans light blue for emails explaining highly technical shit to non-technical users? Funny in theory, absolutely not in action.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rustydrd 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Text looks good, but man the Number hight looks cursed and kinda random.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

they're called lowercase numbers and they're designed to look good in paragraph text. for example if you're reading this comment, mentioning the year 1997 suddenly puts four full height characters as if I typed one word in all caps, while in lowercase numbers it would look more like if I typed the word iggy (1 is x height while 9 and 7 have descenders like g and y).

they're not designed to be used in math or for longer number sequences. for that you have the full height (uppercase) numbers that most typeface should still have.

0123456789 in lowercase have the same heights as oizgjpbyfq - just as random as that word's letter heights are. which is not random at all, you're just not supposed to use it like that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh that makes sense, thanks for the information. Still would not want to use something thats not universal.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

idk what you mean by universal; this is a typographical choice. the only reason you see more uppercase numbers everywhere is because of typewriters and by extension computers. I don't think people make a point of lining numbers up with cap height in handwriting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Their shape is beautiful (from 3 to 9) but why were they not written on the same line?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

lowercase numbers, check my comment above if you're interested

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If your font type was a person:

GIMME AN A

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

They did, in fact, nail it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m more of a sans serif kinda guy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago

Atkinson hyperlegibile is hands down the best for reading ebooks. It was designed for visually impaired people, but it's also super easy on the eyes for everyone else. I read so much faster and more comfortably with this that I can't imagine using anything else.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Baskerville

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This would totally be Brick from The Middle

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Universal Grotesk

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ITC Avant Garde, so beautiful

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

....Isn't Avant Garde a sans serif?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Monaspace Krypton for coding. I'll take no questions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Verdana is my fucking jam. Good spacing and very legible at different font sizes. My only two gripes: Lower case "l" (L) being a straight line and the number 0 has no cross through it. Not major though, cause they're still pretty distinct from similar characters.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago

The subtle kerning of it, the tasteful thickness of it, my god it's even got serifs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Came across Junicode 2 recently, and wow, what a typeface!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

My favorite font foundry is https://indestructibletype.com. Beautiful typefaces, open source, and many different weights. The designer also has some good sex ed videos on his YouTube channel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe a bit basic but I'm fond of Helvetica myself

load more comments
view more: next ›