this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
207 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19156 readers
2550 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

With criminal Trump, having as he does zero respect for laws and legal norms, taking over the DOJ, and literally saying he is going to incarcerate his political enemies, it would be a national security risk for the former president's family to be in federal custody or facing serious federal charges.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

I agree. Since Biden believes that Trump is a fascist, and he didn't do this for purely selfish reasons, I expect him to also issue a blanket pardon for all undocumented immigrants as he is granted the power two do under Article II, Section 2 of the US Constitution. Otherwise, I'll have choice but to believe that he is a corruot individual who is actually just saving his son from legal consequences of matters already resolved in court.

[–] [email protected] 170 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

Who gives a shit? Republicans made a felon president. Nothing fucking matters anymore.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

A felon that had to be given immunity by the supreme court he picked himself in order to stay out of prison long enough for the richest man in the world to get him elected.

You can't make this shit up

[–] [email protected] 33 points 13 hours ago

Reminds me of this

[–] [email protected] 58 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

It's not that people are mad he's doing it, we're mad he's not doing more meaningful thing that will help people not named Biden or help a foreign country commit a genocide.

What gets me tho is his supporters applauding this.

Even when he spent months promising not to do this because of the sanctity of justice system...

I know I could tell he was lying. But his supporters swore up and down Biden wouldn't lie, and now they're supporting it.

Do you honestly not understand why 1/3 of the country treats both parties as out of touch liars who don't care for 99.99% of Americans?

Like, if "nothing matters" why isn't Biden doing more? Why isn't he even appointing all the empty judges seats before Trump can?

Why is the only things he can do on his way out the door arming a genocidal far right religious state for their genocide and pardoning his own son?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Even when he spent months promising not to do this because of the sanctity of justice system…

He probably wasn't lying. Hunter was convicted for purely political reasons. The crimes he was convicted of are rarely enforced and almost never result in jail time against first offenders. The President assumed that his son would be treated fairly like any other first time offender. He believed in the sanctity of the justice system but has now been forced to revise that opinion because it's perfectly clear that he was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 minutes ago

the crimes he was convicted of are rarely enforced and almost never resulted in jail time against first offenders

This is the same line trump supporters use when defending his convictions, and it probably is true for both. If your in politics you and your family are, and should be, under more legal scrutiny then an average person. That's the price of power.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. Trump is about to pardon dozens/hundreds of treasonous terrorists (Jan 6th).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And that's why you should let me go, Your Honor

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

So this is his big Grand exit? He could do so much on the way out the door for the country but instead the senile old fuck only cares about his damn kid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

Minus the 2+ weeks they take for the holidays.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

This is one trivial act.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 18 hours ago (14 children)

Honestly? With the absolute thought crime aspect and the way the plea deal was handled, I don't blame him one bit. There's no public interest in locking up Hunter Biden.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There's no public interest in locking a lot of people up, yet they still do.

Rules should be applied equally, regardless of who you or your parents are.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago

This rule should be disregarded equally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

There’s no public interest in locking up Hunter Biden.

Nonsense. Theres a massive public interest in a privileged member of the political elite being held to the same legal standards and to the same due process as you and me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago)

That's not the same legal standards. Tax charges that the IRS bends over backwards not to use and gun charges that are literally thought crime and also very rarely used.

This was the witch hunt the GOP cries wolf about. The original thing they were looking for was Ukrainian money deals.

For anyone else the IRS would have had a payment plan and the gun charges would have been a plea deal. But we go from politically motivated investigation to politically motivated judge rejecting the plea deal

What about this is the same due process we would have?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (10 children)

Donald Trump has a hitlist. Hunter is on that list. I don't think he deserves the pardon, but he needs it. Republicans will crucify him given the chance. I don't really want to see Republicans holding his head up on a pike for all to see, as much as they'd love that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I am pretty sure that Trump would have had that man killed in prison. In my books his dad did the right thing, fuck the optics.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

I just made a post commenting that it's a national security risk to have a former president's family member incarcerated or under prosecution by the DoJ as Trump is planning to run it. He flat out said he's planning to use the DoJ to incarcerate political rivals.

It's like

"Hey, Joe, we have your son. You need to tell me / support me / help me with [undermining institutions of democracy and our allies], or else."

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›