this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
217 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19156 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 176 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Who gives a shit? Republicans made a felon president. Nothing fucking matters anymore.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

A felon that had to be given immunity by the supreme court he picked himself in order to stay out of prison long enough for the richest man in the world to get him elected.

You can't make this shit up

[–] [email protected] 35 points 15 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 58 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

It's not that people are mad he's doing it, we're mad he's not doing more meaningful thing that will help people not named Biden or help a foreign country commit a genocide.

What gets me tho is his supporters applauding this.

Even when he spent months promising not to do this because of the sanctity of justice system...

I know I could tell he was lying. But his supporters swore up and down Biden wouldn't lie, and now they're supporting it.

Do you honestly not understand why 1/3 of the country treats both parties as out of touch liars who don't care for 99.99% of Americans?

Like, if "nothing matters" why isn't Biden doing more? Why isn't he even appointing all the empty judges seats before Trump can?

Why is the only things he can do on his way out the door arming a genocidal far right religious state for their genocide and pardoning his own son?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Even when he spent months promising not to do this because of the sanctity of justice system…

He probably wasn't lying. Hunter was convicted for purely political reasons. The crimes he was convicted of are rarely enforced and almost never result in jail time against first offenders. The President assumed that his son would be treated fairly like any other first time offender. He believed in the sanctity of the justice system but has now been forced to revise that opinion because it's perfectly clear that he was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

the crimes he was convicted of are rarely enforced and almost never resulted in jail time against first offenders

This is the same line trump supporters use when defending his convictions, and it probably is true for both. If your in politics you and your family are, and should be, under more legal scrutiny then an average person. That's the price of power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Your family should not be under more scrutiny than anybody else and they should not be a target of your political enemies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The President assumed that his son would be treated fairly like any other first time offender.

You're aware Biden is in charge of the DOJ right?

So he's admitting his DOJ was fucked up and acting in bad faith...

But rather than at any point since he realized that, he's choosing to only save his son and still not do any actual justice reform?

A regular person saving their son, ok. We get it

The literal one person able to save millions of sons? He should do actual reform.

He'd save his own son in the process too.

Like, you realize there's a shit ton of open judicial seats Biden is about to let trump seat as soon as he comes into office right?

Are you implying Biden appointed such shit people to lead the DOJ that he now trusts Trump's judgement more?

Like I said:

Like, if “nothing matters” why isn’t Biden doing more? Why isn’t he even appointing all the empty judges seats before Trump can?

But if be really surprised if anyone actually explains why Biden not even appointing 30 judges is ok, let alone why the Senate not confirming 42 is bad.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Biden allowed the prosecution of Hunter to avoid the appearance of not being neutral.

Now that Trump has won and a) is openly talking about pardoning anyone and everyone and b) wanting to prosecute his enemies list, it 100% makes sense to beat him to the punch and pardon Hunter.

If Kamala had won, he would have let it all stand.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If Kamala had won, Hunter would not have been pardoned.

Biden pardoned him because of all the bullshit pardons Trump is talking about.

"You know what, fine, fuck it, Hunter gets a pardon."

[–] [email protected] -3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

So your version is like this?

Biden:

I'm tired of rich privileged people never being held accountable, I'll show them by not allowing my rich privileged son to be held accountable! Now the wealthy from either party isn't being held accountable, which is obviously going to be celebrated by the poor's because both groups of rich and powerful people are unaccountable!

Because that just sounds unbelievable , so I don't think that's what you meant

But man, I can't think of a single other option.

Like, if it's to just rub in republicans faces...

They'd hate it more if we dont give them the 42 open federal judicial seats than Bidens son

Or....

Crazy thought, Biden could do both?

Instead of only saving his son who is clearly and literally self admittedly guilty?

The Biden are never going to love you man. They'll never know you're name, they'll never lose a second of sleep over your troubles.

Trump won't either to be fair, but that doesn't mean you have to spend your time defending. A different group of wealthy oligarchs who aren't subject to the same rules as you and me.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

No, my version is retributive.

"Oh, Trump won? Fuck it, Hunter gets a pardon."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Biden doesnt exactly have a reputation of being keen on actual justice. Just demagogery, racism, and bribe taking disguised as justice. Are there worse crimes than genocide? -- all for some campaign contributions.

Did he not spend his entire senate career beating a drum about being touch on crime, ito the right of republicans, imprisoning two generations of minority americans on flimsy no-victim crimes? Did he not call all the worst racists on the republican side his close friends? Didnt he campaign for them against democrats?

[–] agamemnonymous 3 points 15 hours ago

Seems more likely that it's a preemptive guard against the retribution Trump has been loudly promising. When the next president vows to enact revenge on his political enemies, and your son has been branded a political enemy, you do what you can to try to prevent relatively minor offenses from becoming something more theatrical.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 17 hours ago

Literally fuck you I got mine. Which is why the cunts lost the election.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. Trump is about to pardon dozens/hundreds of treasonous terrorists (Jan 6th).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Honestly, I doubt he will pardon more than a small number people, most of the Jan6ers have nothing that will gain Trump if they are pardoned, and they have shown to be dangerous towards government and authority, these are not people an authoritarian government will want on the streets.

Past actions matter far, far less than future potential gains.

Trump will be back in office, he has won, he doesn't need the Jan6ers anymore.

I am certain that he will pardon a few, to make it seem like he/the republicans care, but the majority will probably stay locked up.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And that's why you should let me go, Your Honor

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

You can commit 34 felonies, as a treat.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If I wanted to operate on republican standards of integrity I'd be a republican.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You’re operating on Republican standards of integrity whether you want to or not, because nothing fucking matters anymore. That’s just the hand you’ve been dealt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

we're only as good as the world lets us be, huh.