this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
1043 points (99.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26934 readers
4272 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Have these folks seen The Good Place? Or are they just approaching the same conclusion by accident?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

By far the smartest show ever written and it's not even close!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago

Idk .. Andor has a really good message.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 minutes ago

For a second there, I really thought you meant

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 minutes ago

If you think about this for any length of time and actually imagine this scenario, you realise you don't pull the lever and it's not even close.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

The meaning behind the trolly problem has been entirely eroded at this point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

I think these scenarios might be easier to analyze if we made them a bit more realistic.

This an analogy for military intervention. If we empower our military to be proactive, we can save one "good guy"^TM^ by killing 3 bystanders. But if NATO's adversaries are participating too we lose 3 of our "good guy"^TM^

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam 6 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

I think the abstract nature is one of the strengths. If you ask someone a question about military intervention, their pre-existing views towards military intervention will heavily bias their answer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 24 minutes ago

its also a good metaphor for climate change

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Look at the actual Cuban Missile Crisis.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

mercifully pulling both levers.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

for the longest time, i did know that game theory did not have anything to do with “games” and that it is somehow connected to the prisoners dilemma, but the concept as such wasn’t very clear to me. If you are like my former me, take 30 minutes out of your day and visit https://ncase.me/trust/ to learn and play around with game theory; it’s a great webpage and it’s pretty good fun all around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

I did a few game theory simulations in college and they were always real interesting. In one of them for example, it was a multiplayer game, with multiple interactions. I think it was to simulate global trade basically: you could cooperate with as many players as you want and each time you cooperate you both get a point. If you defect then you get two and they get none. However, all the players could see what the other players are doing, so if you defected they would know and probably would play (trade) with you. The best way to win was to form as many connections as possible and fully cooperate the whole time.

I formed maybe like 20-30 connections with other players and didn't defect. Each point was worth a few cents or something. So I walked out with a check for like $20-$50 or something. Many players walked out with nothing because they cheated too many people too many times and nobody wanted to trade with them.

Therefore, clearly, the best economic policy is protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, and fucking over both allies and enemies, right? Right?!?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

For those interested, Veritasium has a very good video on this. It also sort of tells what strategy is optimal to "win".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Thank you for sharing the link. That webpage is amazing!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago

That page is very well done and interesting, thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Theoretically, will a collision cause a breach of the radioactive material that's in the box with my cat? Asking for a friend.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 50 minutes ago

Yes and no.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

If cat can witness the event, then Yes or No but not both.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The outcome from both levers pulled is so steep that it really makes no sense to pull the lever

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's why they won't pull the lever, and that's why you should.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Not really. This would all happen so fast and be emotionally, not logically, driven.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago

They'll be thinking the same thing tho and if there is a greater than 20% chance of them pulling the lever it'd be worse in terms of losing family members than not pulling at all.

But in terms of overall death, not pulling the lever is 1 or 4, and pulling the lever is 4 or 13

[–] [email protected] 37 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Do nothing that way you don't get to jail for murder. All the pressure goes to the other guy. Sue the railway company, guy who pulled the lever and the creator. Another is find a way not to reach to that point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like you're not internalizing that this is a thought experiment.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is the dumbest thought experiment I've ever seen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 29 minutes ago

Or so you think

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

Also, it's too late to pull the lever, you'll just provoke a crush.

Lemmy Shitpost-22867873~2

[–] [email protected] 53 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

This isn't philosophy anymore, it's just game theory

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Not even. Game Theory is supposed to take a lot of stuff into account. Boiling it down to this is insulting and a way to paint situations like proxy wars as immoral.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 hours ago

it's interdisciplinary.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 hours ago

por qué no los dos

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

holy prisoner dilemma!

[–] Saledovil 42 points 14 hours ago

Unlike the classic prisoners dilemma, this isn't a nash equilibrium. When I know that the other person pulls their switch, I'd improve my outcome by not pulling mine. Compare to the prisoners dilemma, where not snitching when the other side snitches earns you five years in prison.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

wow what an excellent day in the neighbourhood

i sure hope I won't be faced with an ethical dilemma in the very near future

oh rats it's the trolley problem

[–] [email protected] 27 points 14 hours ago

This was super funny, this person has a great career ahead of her. Very Tim and Eric style obscure indie comedy, I loved it.

[–] Grandwolf319 85 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This feels too high quality for a shit post.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 16 hours ago

Gotta make sure your fiber intake is decent so you get good quality shit like this

[–] [email protected] 105 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If these are tracks in the US then I just understaff the engineers and maintenance teams and the train derails before I have to make a decision, checkmate.

[–] matlag 5 points 7 hours ago

If these tracks are in the US, so I am. So I shoot the other guy with the gun(s) I usually carry around when I go out and then pull the lever.

load more comments
view more: next ›