this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
397 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26863 readers
3120 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 hour ago

>New logo is soulless slop

Every single company

[–] [email protected] 5 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

I hate these new logos these corporations make, the old jaguar logo looked like power the new one looks like some weird startup.

[–] thatKamGuy 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

/uj Technically this is their new logo:

J a G U a r is just their new typeface (I think that’s the name?); and apparently/allegedly is to make the pronunciation closer to UK English, rather than American.

Either way, though - it’s still..

/j

..pReTtY fArKiN’ sToOoPiD.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

I would have guessed that was a Puma logo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Their logo doesn't have a jaguar and their car commercial doesn't have any cars. Fuck it, whatever

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago

They went from luxury car company to mediocre smartphone brand

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?

That's impressive, haha.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

It looks like an off brand sportswear shirt you'd find on an African market.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

GUys I'm from ~~2040~~ 2035, here's Microsoft's logo

MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)

BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)

spoiler

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

We've gone full circle again

[–] Atomic 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

You're all making fun of it but this new style did exactly what it intended to do. Everyone is talking about them now.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah, for a whole 2 hours, until everyone moves on to bitch about the next thing and then Jaguar are stuck with the shitty new logo no-one recognises for long after that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

If only they sold stuff that the people talking about it could afford in the first place, maybe that'd boost their sales.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn't one good design element in this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

It’s not joguor?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think they want people to focus on the "agua" and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago

The "a" is the worst part for me. You can't see those little stubbs at a distance. So it reads JoGuor at a distance. They didn't just fail to create a good logo, they failed to preserve the name. One bit of advice I always give is "imagine this logo on the back of a golf card or a Pride brochure. If the logo isn't crisp and readable in black and white in a 1/2 inch square then it sucks." This design fails that test. Not just because of the messed up "a" but the wide spacing makes those unreadable "a"s even smaller than if the letters weren't so widely spaced.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say "car" at all either; no elegance or prestige. The old logo was sexy. New one looks like a logo for bottled water or something.

Edit: it's like going from James Bond to Austin Powers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Austin Powers has style. Crazy 60s style but style.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Ya, I wanted to use a bland spy but there aren't any-- I was going to use the Spy vs Spy guys because they are the most generic-looking, but ultimately I kept Powers because while he is stylish and fun, he is also really immature and the logo looks immature to me.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It's got the personality of unfinished drywall.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly I think unfinished drywall has more personality. It’s utilitarian and rough around the edges, without the shiny surface veneer.

That new Jaguar logo is like somebody took a beautiful old house full of exposed brick and wood work and put a coating of white paint over everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

It should be those puprple and yellows of Corporate Memphis

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The younger generation barely reads let alone reads cursive. This is next generation marketing you aren't the audience I imagine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Even if that's what's going on (or at least that assumption on the part of the design team is what's going on), this is shit. You know what requires even less reading than script OR basic print? THE FUCKING PICTURE OF THE FUCKING JUNGLE CAT.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 16 hours ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Spotify and EBay made the right choices here, the new logos are way better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It is subjective, I like the old eBay logo more, but dislike the old Airbnb one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Well, they certainly fin in better with all the others.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

All these minimalist labels save .0005¢ every time they’re printed, probably even more on promo booths, banners, and the like.

[–] BrowseMan 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Aaaah then indeed that makes sense (and this is not ironic).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh, I wasn’t being entirely serious, though there is an element of truth to it. It probably is a measurable cost savings over the scale of the business.

I still think these unremarkable corporate logos are boring AF. Just makes them visually soulless along with just being corporate soulless.

[–] BrowseMan 1 points 30 minutes ago

I completly agree these logos are boring. The brand lost so much character and flare.

However I totally see "cost less" as one of the reason why these changes were pushed (especially for clothing brands).

[–] [email protected] 47 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Better:

  • Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
  • airbnb (from awful to meh)
  • Spotify (same)

Worse:

  • Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
  • eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
  • Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that's suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they're from)
  • Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
  • DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
  • Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I'm a pacifist.)

The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷

[–] [email protected] 21 points 15 hours ago

I liked the old aibnb one.

Microsoft went from "boring with a bit of attitude" to just plain boring

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Those old fashion logos are actually sick. Concerning that an industry that sells style would make these their logos.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 15 hours ago

Except eBay, that was always trash.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 19 hours ago

"We're a tech company now!" logo

[–] [email protected] 65 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Top looks like it belongs on a nice sports car.

Bottom looks like you can find it on a new Multipla.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Could JOGUOR become the new KN?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago

You were supposed to remove the text...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 18 hours ago (10 children)

Somewhere in Jaguar HQ, a marketing firm convinced the CxO suite that the most pressing problem facing the company was that the logo was wrong. So, in the interests of the shareholders they write off the goodwill value of the existing brand and dump millions of euro into this.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I love how the new logo could be literally done in less than a minute on fucking microsoft office. They didn't even bother with a cool looking font, just generic curvy shit

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure they spent an unreasonable amount of time getting that ugly font look just right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

It cost at last 50 million in a fancy name designer fees.

load more comments
view more: next ›