this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
198 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2584 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 159 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ye gods, America, you had four years and an open-and-shut case and it wasn't enough to get rid of the orange ghoul.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

And just watch the neck breaking speed the Republicans rush through their political persecution cases. I expect to see Democrats in prison by the end of the first or second year.

:(

[–] Shiggles 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I envy your optimism in choosing years instead of months.

[–] Corkyskog 8 points 2 weeks ago

All this stuff is going to take years. It will be death by a thousand cuts. The people who are planning this aren't going to risk moving too fast where constituents of blue states beg for secession.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I envy their optimism at claiming they'll end up in prison over a grave.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't expect the party to still exist 365 days from now.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Don't get my hopes up like that! I can't take another upset right now lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Schiff won his new senate seat. It'll be interesting to see if they go after a sitting senator

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

I don't see why they wouldn't. They'll say "we" went after a sitting president with impeachment so they'll go after anyone and everyone with the fascist cheerleaders on Fox pushing for the death penalty (which they're already doing).

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

For what? What crimes can actually be proven in court?

[–] blockheadjt 5 points 2 weeks ago

Have you been living under a rock?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder how hard you need to prove anything if the judges issue sentencing without needing much of anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Implying anything needs to be proven in court when the judge is a Trump appointee.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hitler went to jail. What good did it serve the Germans?

[–] ayyy 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yea, guess we shouldn’t even try. What’s your point?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

My point is that fascism builds until the root causes and those fanning its flames are rooted out and destroyed ala Napoleon, Mussolini, Hitler; or they burn on and continue to oppress under an authoritarian like Franco, Pinochet or Putin. There aren’t a whole lot of examples in between where an authoritarian relinquishes power after a short term.

I know which one I prefer, and, from example, we can see a little jail time is insufficient.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Shitlibs love making excuses for accepting a tiered "justice" system, they have no points, they just love the taste of boot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Ya, he was 78 years old when he went to jail Einstein.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is really the worst part of this whole thing. If a 'normal' politician with his exact platform had won the election, it wouldn't feel nearly as bad. It'd still be awful, but not nearly as bad. The fact that he's getting away with all of this shit, that's the real kick in the teeth. It's a complete hemorrhage of justice and it really just hammers home how utterly fucked the system is. There is no justice, unless the perpetrator is poor and/or brown, and that should piss everyone off, regardless of political affiliation.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It does, we should organize before January somehow.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've spent the better part of the last year trying to convince people to hold their nose and vote blue to stop exactly this from happening, and that clearly was for nothing... I've got a lot of anger that I'd love to redirect at this new source of outrage. If you've got any insights on developing movements to rally around, I'd love to hear about it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sorry, I dont know. Maybe we could try to form a coalition, but as always, I doubt the Democrats would want to band with socialists and communists. Maybe we could identify the mechanisms other fascists used to accelerate and assert their control over the population and use that information to impede him. I really dont know. Registering for the Socialists just sounds like it'll be my name on their list when they are arrested and dispersed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Organize for what, exactly? A big reason he shouldn't be in office is because he incited an insurrection on January 6 to overturn an election. Any kind of organization to prevent him taking office would also be an attempt to overturn an election.

If you have a different goal in mind, I'm all ears. But I've been crying that democracy and elections are sacred and I'll be damned if I'm going to change my mind because it's gone the other way.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Seems to me that an election involving a candidate that is inelligble should result in disqualification. The election should have never proceeded with him as a candidate. Can't be overturning an election if the election was invalid to start with.

[–] dream_weasel 3 points 2 weeks ago

How many people to knock down a fox News building by force?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I know that sounded bad, but its not to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. Its to block all harm going to be done to trans communities and immigrants, and maybe save some climate initiatives too. Its to build a network of citizens to help counteract all the extremely horrible shit in Project 2025. We're going to have to get guerilla with this regime's projected iron grip.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If legal justice was going to happen to Trump, it would have by now. This shit is pure theater.

Our options are vigilante justice or no justice.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

So long as he doesn't miss, I don't really care what costume he's wearing.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

My fellow Americans, if you sat out the election because Harris didn’t excite you enough or she wasn’t perfect, what’s coming from Trump is on you.

And if you voted for Jill Stein because you don’t understand how foreign aid is established (it’s via Congress) or you believed the hype of “genocide” or that Republicans weren’t worth your protests, what’s coming to Gaza is on you.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

I voted from Germany and my vote never got verified 🤬

[–] timbuck2themoon 9 points 2 weeks ago

To some extent I dislike them less than non voters. Yeah theyre dumb and voted for a Russian plant who openly admitted she wanted to stop Harris but... At least they showed up. They did something.

Non voters are lazy fucks who deserve everything coming. They didn't do the bare minimum. I don't care your reasons. You let fascism in and didn't even bother to do your civic duty, even if it was doing a write in.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Now seems like exactly not the time to pause, but ok, Jack.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He's going to wind down and pussy out. Jim Jordan already threatened him and said "keep your receipts."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's more likely that he looked at how much work his team has done and how much they have left to do. My guess is 2 months isn't enought time with current resources.

[–] ayyy -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s almost like he’s been a pathetic nazi this entire time…

[–] blockheadjt 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh hey it's a republican terrorist, fuck you, blocked

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Serious question: what country is safe for Smith to flee to?

If Smith does not flee, I am 100% confident Trump's DOJ or HSI will make a vicious example of him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He really could have killed somebody on the street.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Presidented circumstances

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pausing for a faster, aggressive game plan I hope.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nope. Pausing because the JD doesn’t investigate sitting presidents, and having the team work on this for another 2 months would be a waste of their time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Best case scenario is that he's using the time to summarize everything in a public report.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

I said from day one, the dog and pony show will come to an end the day after the election, regardless who won, because that's all it's been, is a dog and pony show. The oligarchy will never convict one of their own.