this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
229 points (99.6% liked)

News

23376 readers
2114 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft landed in a New Mexico desert late on Friday, months after its original departure date and without the two astronauts it carried when it launched in early June.

Starliner returned to Earth seemingly without a hitch, a Nasa live stream showed, nailing the critical final phase of its mission.

The spacecraft re-entered Earth’s atmosphere around 11pm ET at orbital speeds of roughly 27,400km/h (17,025mph). About 45 minutes later, it deployed a series of parachutes to slow its descent and inflated a set of airbags moments before touching down at the White Sands Space Harbor, an arid desert in New Mexico.

top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Still was the right decision not to chance it.
But I bet the astronauts wish they'd been on it now.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Someone who's worked their entire life to not only become trained as an astronaut, but actually go on a space mission. What do you think they prefer? Going home today or staying another few months on an actual space station?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think they'd prefer going home. The mission they came up for is long done, they may have important events in their life or their family's lives scheduled for after the planned return, and staying up for months increases the chances of long term damage to their bodies.

I imagine they're pretty bored by now.

[–] MartianSands 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They certainly won't be bored. Astronauts time on the ISS is a precious resource, and work will have been found for them even if they weren't expected to be there

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I think I read somewhere, but I'd have to go track it down, that the ISS was catching up on a whole lot of back-logged experiments with their unexpected addition to the team.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I keep saying the same thing and get a bunch of people replying things like, "how do you know they want to see their kids?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah there’s a thanksgiving and a Christmas coming up that they’ll miss.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, I've met some absent parents that genuinely don't care if they see their kids again, and unfortnately it is possible for someone like that to be capable of being an astronaut.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Sure, but I think that's a different argument from "they won't take seeing their kids again over months in space when it was supposed to be an eight-day mission because they're in space."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

You would think that, but that's probably not the case. This is what they train for, this is what they want to do. As a rule, astronauts don't tend to get bored of space, that's why they're astronauts.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

0 gravity and living in an enclosed space take a huge toll on one physical and mental being, obviously they wanna go home today, but i bet they also wanna go home in one piece

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That makes me wonder. What happens if an astronaut just...refuses to come back? They're up on the station and their mission is at its end. They broadcast to NASA. "Actually, I've decided not to come back. I live here now." How would NASA handle that situation?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I seem to recall reading somewhere they have sedatives and stuff because people have a real potential to freak out and try to walk out of air locks.

I'll see if I can find the article.

Edit: I didn't reread it... but I had this one book marked

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow. Good find. It looks like they were concerned about a potentially suicidal person opening the hatch. So much so that they actually installed a padlock on it in future flights.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That's right, I remember that now. A failed experiment or something made the astronaut suicidal....not the one I was thinking of, let me see if I can find the other one lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Actually, I’ve decided not to come back. I live here now.”

Ed Baldwin, is that you?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

and that could have potentially been what caused to crash and burn or burn and crash. choices choices.

anyhow... I'm thinking they want to be home right now, but maybe not riding on a boeing.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 months ago

Boeing killed John Barnett

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like the part where they waited until after markets closing to take a chance. Also note how NASA announced that astronauts were staying after markets closed.

[–] TheMightyCanuck 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Meet: The Interrobang. ‽ Combination of two types of punctuation that indicates both at once.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Right choice, play it safe. Glad it landed safely, competition in space is a good thing. Better than a monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago

Amazing. Given Boeings recent track record, I didn't expect it to do that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

People are (rightfully) raking Starliner and Boeing for the shitshow that has been this project so far. But the positive to take from this flight, even landing without the crew, is the fact that the capsule itself performed fine. It was the service module that was being screwy. The actual "capsule" part in "capsule" seems to have had it's issues ironed out. Just fix the shitty service module.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Alex baumgardner jumped from the balloon from basically space, why haven't they figured out a way to do it from low orbit yet?

[–] bob_omb_battlefield 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because he wasn't moving very fast... To be in orbit you need to be traveling around the earth extremely quickly. The problem is slowing down, not the altitude.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And the ionosphere is the dangerous part. Bellow that, drag slows you down before you burn.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because he jumped while in the stratosphere (middle level of 3-level atmosphere surrounding the earth). Therefore he didn't have to manage the friction and heat that space shuttles have to endure when they enter the uppermost mesosphere, then stratosphere, then troposphere.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratosphere

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago