Spend that $11M on providing drinkable water to people on-base instead maybe?
Naaaaaah. Then some random colonel wouldn't get to sniff the Rock's jock.
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
121 points (96.9% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6433 readers
626 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Where did you not have drinkable water?
And you think reallocating the recruitment budget fixes a negligence problem?
Just privatize the army, I hear it's way more efficient
A couple of the articles about this mentioned that UFL's viewing figures were believed to be harmed by this deal as well.
So not only did fewer people want to join the army after seeing UFL and the rock promote it, but fewer people wanted to watch UFL after seeing it was associated with the army. Talk about a toxic brand.
Habitual Linecrosser tweeted about this as well
I think they already tried that route a while ago. Dustin on Smarter Every Day did several videos about the Navy and I think Coast Guard. Idk who mr Linecrosser is but I don't think the military would ever approve normal YouTube content that is aimed at children. Like there's not going to be a "Last one to survive Mr. Beasts mine field wins 1 million dollars!!!" video sponsored by the Army.
Habitual Linecrosser is a former missile defense operator turned YouTuber. No one's talking about aiming content at children with Mr Beast type shit, not sure where you got that from. We need to increase recruitment and more people in the 17-25 age range are watching Youtube over regular TV.
Is The Rock even popular with their target demographic, 18-25 year olds? Seems like they're targeting Gen Zers with the kind of star power that Millenials would fall over for.
Maybe they should do more stuff like when Transformers had really army personal doing actual training exercises in the movie then advertise the heck out of the fact that that was real stuff you can do by joining the armed forces. Or just advertise hard on the benefits since Gen Zers seem really in tune with that
or build a country they'd actually choose to fight for?
Just write/film war media, people slurp it up. Authors will often avoid writing about war, because it's hard to not make it seem cool, even when the entire point of the work is that war is atrocious.
Are you John Wayne?
Needs more e-girls.
Hard to imagine a worse font choice than that bottom one.
Meanwhile in Canada, you can grow a beard now while getting raped in a black-mould-filled bucket for 4 years.
A crumb of context?
Widespread sexual abuse and dangerously moldy ships are two notable scandals the Canadian forces have had recently, as part of a larger growing infamy, and terms of service last a lot longer than in America. Their response to beef up recruitment is... relaxed facial hair restrictions.
Were just the best ain't we
Fixed. For whatever reason, it's always hard to catch those little errors in the first draft. I know it's "their", but my fingers think it's all the same.
What I think needs to happen, without being deeply involved, is just a top-to-bottom rethink of the organisation. When I read about the Canadian forces, it sounds like they're still set up like a British Empire garrison, basically. That speaks to young Canadians neither ideologically nor as a desirable workplace. Also, just having actual funding for things like removing toxic mould would be good.