198
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago

I feel like this map was designed to piss off everyone.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

New England is fully correct so no one there will be mad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Where's the pacific northwest? It's labeled weird.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

All of Cascadia.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago

If you go up to any Hoosier (resident of Indiana) and tell them they live in the Ohio River Valley, you're getting punched in the face

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

Jersey sure as shit ain't "Chesapeake".

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Neither is Pennsylvania, this map is way off.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I feel like there's a weird feral vibe in Philly anyway, Definitely should be a specific region.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Delaware Valley.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Absolutely never will you catch a southern Illinoisan saying we’re from/in the south. We say Midwest or southern Illinois to be more specific.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I never understood why people think WV is a southern state. 1) It fucking snows and is cold af in winter. 2) We literally exist because we ain't traitors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

Central Texas is nothing like East Texas, so that makes the rest of this map suspect.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yea, this map is nonsense.

I've never heard half of these names used like this.

"Chesapeake"... First I've never heard it used as a region, second the region so labeled on the map would be better called Mid-Atlantic (~~and that wouldn't really be accurate either~~) that really is the Mid-Atlantic region, and there's no Mid-Atlantic on this map, but there's a Mid-Atlantic South (which I've never heard anyone use - VA is Mid-Atlantic).

Third, the Chesapeake doesn't even extend to PA, let alone up to NY or Jersey, over there is the Delaware Bay, so should we call that region "Delaware"?

I've never once heard anyone call that region Chesapeake - it's the Mid-Atlantic.

Then there's the Texas nonsense - there's West Texas, Central, East (sometimes jokingly referred to as Arkansas) I'll allow Rio Grande though I've never heard that used.

The West stuff... Yea, no. The Rockies, OK.

A source would be useful, perhaps knowing the context (like how this is used) would clarify things.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Also, it looks like the "Central Valley" in CA extends uphill to the top of the Sierras and Lake Tahoe. Plus "Socal" is as far north as Carmel.

No. Carmel is the Central Coast. You might as well add that to the Central Valley and add some new group for the Sierra Nevada mountains that includes northern CA above Sacramento. The north coast is culturally and geographically similar to the Sierras. "Socal" doesn't extend farther north than Santa Barbara.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah... I've heard of Cascadia before, but people here would say they're in the Pacific NW region.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prettybunnys 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Chesapeake kinda looks like it’s the Chesapeake bays watershed, for what it’s worth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

A lot of those are overlapping, like Appalacha and the Great Lakes both extend into Upstate NY, much of lower Appalacha is also considered mid-atlantic, etc

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The map labels central Texas as Texas and east Texas as Deep South. They're labeled differently. I don't understand your comment.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Neat!

Though, I've found a lot of folks from a lot of parts of this map would just tell me they're "from the Midwest".

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

That's shorthand we use for people outside of the Midwest or those unfamiliar with the region.

It's similar to a person from a suburb of Boston just saying they're from Boston for simplicity's sake even if a lot of important nuance and context is lost.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

That’s because the majority of these regions are horseshit. Nearly everything around the Midwest in this map doesn’t exist and we’ll just say we’re from the Midwest

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I've found a lot of folks from a lot of parts of this map would just tell me they're "from the Midwest".

I would venture to say that the part of all of these regions adjacent to the Midwest could be considered subregions of it. Many people you'd meet in these areas would be likely to say they're in the Midwest.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, living in what the map calls "lower midwest" the midwest will do its best to not include.

I live in Missouri, friends living in midwest states "Missouri isn't Midwest." They can't tell you exactly where it is, but it sure isn't midwest. And the exclusion seems to continue all the way northward until I'm convinced Wisconsin is just attempting to rename itself "Midwest" so that no one else can claim it.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I assure you that nobody in Philadelphia considers themselves to be part of the Chesapeake region

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

And no one from Indiana says they live in the Ohio River Valley.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Maybeeee a few of the folks in Jeffersonville might. Maaaaayybeee

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I've lived in PA and NJ for 20+ years as an adult. Never heard anyone reference Chesapeake.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've never heard anyone refer to the mid Atlantic south, but the piedmont is common.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Mid-atlantic, sure. Never Mid-atlantic-south.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I've read a variant of this that's little more interesting, and useful, because it includes the backstory, as well as Canada's role (which does overlap a lot of the US).

It's not 100% accurate, largely because of urbanization, but you can see how we got to where we are today.

[-] southsamurai 6 points 1 week ago

Nothing in Texas is part of the south. Not only will the south tell you that, Texas will tell you that

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Hard disagree. I lived in Dallas for 15 years. Longview and Tyler are classic Southern.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Well, they don’t even get all of Texas. So, who cares what they have to say. Can’t even keep their whole state. Who knew “Texas” was just a small chunk in the middle.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Some of these things seem solely topographical-based.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

SoCal does not go up that far not even close. Gross

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As a non-american, I have never heard of "northwoods" before.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Missing the rust belt and the Bible belt...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

This guide is inaccurate. The region labelled midwest is actually in the east. And the region labelled deep south is actually in the northern hemisphere.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The Rocky Mountains extend into NE Washington state. The map is a very rough approximation at best.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

This might belong in no stupid questions but, what is the significance of Columbia? There seems to be no geographical consistency, it seems to be used accross several countries and languages. What's the deal? Lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ArbitraryValue 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think New England is a useful category anymore, since modern-day Maine doesn't have more in common with the Boston area than it does with upstate New York. I'd extend what they're calling the "NYC Metro" area from Boston in the north to Philadelphia (or maybe even D.C.) in the south as a sort of east coast mega-city.

[-] BananaPeal 8 points 1 week ago

Head on over to Boston and tell them that they're in the NYC Metro area, I dare you. I want to watch.

Instead, split New England into Southern and Northern. Southern includes Mass, Rhode Island, Eastern Connecticut (the NYC Metro area is fine there), and south New Hampshire. Northern is everything else. Some may argue that Portland, Maine should be included in Southern, but I argue that while the culture has some similarities to Southern New England, it's more similar to the rest of Maine. Go to a redneck party in Southern Maine and start talking about the Old Port. Pay attention to how many people have an opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I'd extend what they're calling the "NYC Metro" area from Boston in the north to Philadelphia (or maybe even D.C.) in the south as a sort of east coast mega-city.

What you're describing is called the I95 Corridor.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Brave but not inaccurate.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

As a European, this map is excellent!

[-] southsamurai 8 points 1 week ago

Don't trust it. At best, some of it used to be accurate in a useful way. But even then, the terminology wouldn't match well.

The closest you could get in comparison would be placing outlines of Prussia over modern Europe and saying that it was still a region. Yeah, there's some connections, but it ain't gonna help you much

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

NEPA will not be happy about being considered "Upper Appalachia."

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
198 points (82.1% liked)

Cool Guides

4181 readers
3 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS